Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endogenous product differentiation and product R&D in spatial Cournot competition

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate in a spatial Cournot competition setting how much product research and development (R&D) investment firms make in order to differentiate their goods. The model features a location competition in the first stage, R&D competition in the second stage, and Cournot competition in the third stage. There are two differentiation methods in the model—spatial differentiation affecting the firm costs, and differentiation in the demand function affecting the demand levels. We find that comparing to the setting with no spatial connotation, the firms tend to invest less in product R&D. We also consider welfare implications. Although the firms employ maximum differentiation in equilibrium, there are cases in which welfare can be improved if the firms are to locate closer to each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson SP, Neven DJ (1991) Cournot competition yields spatial agglomeration. Int Econ Rev 32: 793–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Rivas JM (2000) Plant proliferation in a spatial model of Cournot competition. Reg Sci Urban Econ 30: 507–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton BC, Schmitt N (1994) Flexible manufacturing and market structure. Am Econ Rev 84: 875–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JH, Thisse J-F, Weskamp A (1989) Spatial discrimination: Bertrand vs. Cournot in a model of location choice. Reg Sci Urban Econ 19: 87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irmen A, Thisse J-F (1998) Competition in multi-characteristics spaces: Hotelling was almost right. J Econ Theory 78: 76–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin P, Saggi K (2002) Product differentiation, process R&D, and the nature of market competition. Eur Econ Rev 46: 201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neven D, Thisse J-F (1990) On quality and variety competition. In: Gabszewicz JJ, Richard J-F, Wolsey L (eds) Economic decision making: games, econometrics, and optimization.Contributions in the honour of Jacques H. Drèze. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 175–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman G, Thisse J-F (1999) Technology choice and market structure: strategic aspects of flexible manufacturing. J Ind Econ 47: 345–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal D (1998) Does Cournot competition yield spatial agglomeration?. Econ Lett 60: 49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal D, Sarkar J (2002) Spatial competition among multi-store firms. Int J Ind Organ 20: 163–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal D, Sarkar J (2006) Spatial Cournot competition among multi-plant firms in a circular city. South Econ J 73: 246–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu D (2002) Product differentiation in spatial Cournot markets. Econ Lett 76: 317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh N, Vives X (1984) Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND J Econ 15: 546–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabuchi T (1994) Two-stage two-dimensional spatial competition between two firms. Reg Sci Urban Econ 24: 207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C-M, Lai F-C (2003) Cournot competition in spatial markets: some further results. Pap Reg Sci 82: 569–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisuke Shimizu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ebina, T., Shimizu, D. Endogenous product differentiation and product R&D in spatial Cournot competition. Ann Reg Sci 49, 117–133 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-011-0440-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-011-0440-x

JEL Classification

Navigation