Skip to main content

National oligopolies and economic geography

Abstract

We replace monopolistic competition with national oligopolies in a model of “new economic geography”. There are many possible bifurcation diagrams, but unlike in monopolistic competition, the symmetric equilibrium is always stable for low trade costs. The antitrust policy, though identical in both countries, affects the geographical distribution of firms. In turn, migration attenuates the effectiveness of the antitrust policy in eliminating collusive behavior. For high trade costs, a toughening of the antitrust policy is likely to result in more agglomeration and may reduce world welfare. The antitrust policy is more likely to be welfare improving when market integration progresses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Baldwin RE, Forslid R, Martin P, Ottaviano GIP, Robert-Nicoud F (2005) Economic geography and public policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brülhart M, Trionfetti F (2004) Public expenditure, international specialisation and agglomeration. Eur Econ Rev 48:851–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Combes P-Ph (1997) Industrial agglomeration under Cournot competition. Ann Econ Stat 45: 161–182

    Google Scholar 

  4. Connor JM (2005) Price-fixing overcharges: legal and economic evidence. Staff Paper No. 04-17, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette. Appendix tables are available online: http://www.agecon.purdue.edu/staff/connor/papers/Price_Fixing_Overcharges_Appendix_Tables.pdf

  5. Connor JM (2007) Price-fixing overcharges: legal and economic evidence. In: Kirkwood JB (ed) Research in law and economics, vol 22. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 59–153

    Google Scholar 

  6. d’Aspremont C, Gabszewicz JJ, Thisse J-F (1979) On Hotelling’s ‘Stability in Competition’. Econometrica 47: 1145–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dewit G, Leahy D, Montagna C (2003) Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 137

  8. Dixit AK, Stiglitz JE (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67: 297–308

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fujita M, Krugman PR, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy. The MIIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fujita M, Thisse J-F (2002) Economics of agglomeration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  11. Head K, Mayer T (2000) Non-Europe: the magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in Europe. Weltwirtsch Archiv 136: 285–314

    Google Scholar 

  12. Head K, Mayer T, Ries J (2002) On the pervasiveness of home market effects. Economica 69: 371–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Helpman E (1998) The size of regions. In: Pines D, Sadka E, Zilcha I (eds) Topics in public economics. Theoretical and applied analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 33–54

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econ J 39: 41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krugman PR (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99: 483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ludema RD, Wooton I (2000) Economic geography and the fiscal effects of regional integration. J Int Econ 52: 331–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCallum J (1995) National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns. Am Econ Rev 85: 615–623

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ottaviano GIP, Tabuchi T, Thisse J-F (2002) Agglomeration and trade revisited. Int Econ Rev 43: 409–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Puga D (1999) The rise and fall of regional inequalities. Eur Econ Rev 43: 303–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou H (2007) Oligopolistic competition and economic geography. J Reg Sci 47: 915–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Annicchiarico.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Annicchiarico, B., Orioli, F. & Trionfetti, F. National oligopolies and economic geography. Ann Reg Sci 48, 71–99 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0414-4

Download citation

JEL Classification

  • R12
  • R13
  • F12