Skip to main content
Log in

Does Gibrat’s law for cities hold when location counts?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to Gibrat’s law, the growth rates of cities are expected to be independent of their sizes. In this study, we hypothesize that growth rates do depend on population size, but that the direction of the relationship depends on location, i.e., in unfavorable loci, growth rates are positively related to size, while the relationship is reversed in favorable loci, i.e., places with several location advantages. The present study examines that possibility, using 1990–2000 population growth data for two levels of geographic resolution—4,667 local administrative units (i.e., municipalities) and 2,189 contiguous urban areas in 40 European countries. According to our findings, when individual localities are considered, ‘proportionate’ growth (expected under Gibrat’s law) emerges at the aggregate (system-wide) level, but ‘dissipates’ when the settlement system is disaggregated into two urban sub-systems, formed by well-positioned localities and poorly positioned ones. Concurrently, for urban areas, a strong positive association between population size and growth emerges both before and after controlling for location attributes. However, this association between population size and growth is not especially strong, if favorably and unfavorably located urban areas are looked at separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ades AF, Glaeser EL (1995) Trade and circuses: explaining urban giants. Q J Econ 110(1): 195–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso W (1971) The economics of urban size. In: Friedman J, Alonso W (eds) Regional policy: theory and applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 334–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson G, Ge Y (2005) The size distribution of Chinese cities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 35(6): 756–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach F (1913) Das Gesetz der Bevolkerungskonzeutration. Petermanns Mitteilungen 59:74–76 (cited in Nitsch V (2005) Zipf zipped. J Urban Econ 57:86–100)

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2006) Hierarchy in cities and city systems. In: Pumain D (eds) Hierarchy in natural and social sciences. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 143–168

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Black D, Henderson V (2003) Urban evolution in the USA. J Econ Geogr 3: 343–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bode E (2008) Delineating metropolitan areas using land prices. J Reg Sci 48(1): 131–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhoff T (2007) City population database. http://www.citypopulation.de

  • Cheshire PC, Magrini S (2006) Population growth in European cities: weather matters—but only nationally. Reg Stud 40(1): 23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark SJ, Stabler JC (1991) Gibrat’s law and the growth of Canadian cities. Urban Stud 28(4): 635–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba JC (2008) On the distribution of city sizes. J Urban Econ 63: 177–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duranton G (1999) Distance, land, and proximity, economic analysis and the evolution of cities. Research Papers in Environmental and Spatial Analysis No 53. (Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics)

  • Eeckhout I (2004) Gibrat’s law for all cities. Am Econ Rev 94(5): 1429–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2000) ESRI data and maps. Environmental Science Research Institute, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2008) Urban audit database—Inforegio. http://www.urbanaudit.org/DataAccessed.aspx. Accessed June 2008

  • Eurostat (2009) Local administrative units. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nuts/lau_en.html. Accessed Dec 2009

  • Fujita M, Tomoya M (1997) Structural stability and evolution of urban systems. Reg Sci Urban Econ 27: 399–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix X (1999) Zipf’s law for cities: an explanation. Q J Econ 114: 739–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup JL, Sachs J, Mellinger A (1999) Geography and economic development. Int Reg Sci Rev 22: 179–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geonames (2007) Geonames project database (http://www.geonames.org)

  • Gibrat R (1931) Les inégalités économiques: applications aux inégalités des richesses, à la concentration des entreprises, aux populations des villes, aux statistiques des familles, etc., d’une loi nouvelle, la loi de l’effet proportionnel. Paris, Recueil Sirey (Cited in: Kalecki M (1945) On the Gibrat Distribution. Econometrica 13(2):161–170 and Moeckel R (2009) Simulation of firms as a planning support system to limit urban sprawl of jobs. Plann Des 36(5):883–905)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser EL (2005) Smart Growth: education, skilled work & the future of cold weather cities. In: John F (ed) Policy brief. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotway C, Young LJ (2002) Combining incompatible spatial data. J Am Stat Assoc 97(48): 632–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guérin-Pace F (1993) Deux siècles de croissance urbaine. Paris, Anthropos (Cited in: Pumain D, Moriconi-Ebrard F (1997) City size distributions and metropolization. GeoJournal 43(3):307–314)

  • Henry MS, Barkley DL, Bao S (1997) The hinterland’s stake in metropolitan growth: evidence from selected southern regions. J Reg Sci 37(3): 479–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides YM, Overman HG (2003) Zipf’s law for cities: an empirical examination. Reg Sci Urban Econ 33: 127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa Y, Montanari A (eds) (2004) The new geography of human mobility: inequality trends. Societa Geographica Italiana, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki M (1945) On the Gibrat distribution. Econometrica 13(2): 161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson C, Olsson M (2006) The identification of functional regions: theory, methods, and applications. Ann Reg Sci 40(1): 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan G, Balk D, Anderson B (2007) The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environ Urban 19(1): 17–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minami M, ESRI (2000) Using ArcMap: GIS. Redlands, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitsch V (2005) Zipf zipped. J Urban Econ 57: 86–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem. In: Concepts and techniques in modern geography. Monograph series. Geo Books, London, pp 38–41

  • Partridge M, Bollman RD, Olfert MR, Alasia A (2007) Riding the wave of urban growth in the countryside: spread, backwash, or stagnation?. Land Econ 83(2): 128–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Polese M, Shearmur R (2006) Growth and location of economic activity: the spatial dynamics of industries in Canada 1971–2001. Growth Change 37(3): 362–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnov BA, Erell E (2001) Urban clustering: the benefits and drawbacks of location. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Portnov BA, Schwartz M (2008) On the relativity of urban location. Reg Stud 42(4): 605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnov BA, Schwartz M (2009a) Urban clusters as growth foci. J Reg Sci 49(2): 287–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnov BA, Schwartz M (2009b) On the importance of location package for urban growth. Urb Stud 46(8):1665–1679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pumain D (1982) La dynamique des villes. Economica, Paris, 231 p cited in Suarez-Villa L (1988) Metropolitan evolution, sectoral economic change, and the city size distribution. Urb Stud 25:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain D, Moriconi-Ebrard F (1997) City size distributions and metropolization. GeoJournal 43(3): 307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport J (2006) Moving to nice weather. Reg Sci Urb Econ 37: 375–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed WJ (2002) On the rank-size distribution for human settlements. J Reg Sci 42(1): 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson BT (1973) Urban growth, an approach. Methuen, London, p p 268

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose AK (2005) Cities and countries. In: NBER working paper series working paper 11762. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi-Hansberg E, Wright MLJ (2007) Urban structure and growth. Rev Econ Stud 74: 597–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salway R, Wakefield J (2005) Sources of bias in ecological studies of non-rare events. Environ Ecol Stat 12: 321–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen T (2002) Urban form and commuting behaviour: a cross-European perspective. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 93(3): 336–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strutzer A, Frey BS (2004) Stress that doesn’t pay: the commuting paradox. Discussion Paper Series IZA DP No. 1278

  • UNEP and UNESCO (2004) Millennium ecosystem assessment report. UNESCO, New York

  • Vaturi A, Portnov BA, Schwartz M (2004) Internal migration and fiscal capacity of local authorities: a case study of the Greater Tel Aviv Metropolitan Area, 1985-1997. Space Polity 8(1): 61–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlora NR (1979) Città et territorio. Bologne: Pàtron (Cited in: Pumain, D (2000) Settlement systems in the evolution. Geogr Ann 82B(2):73–87)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf GK (1932) Selected studies of the principle of relative frequency in language. Mass, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris A. Portnov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Portnov, B.A., Reiser, B. & Schwartz, M. Does Gibrat’s law for cities hold when location counts?. Ann Reg Sci 48, 151–178 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0402-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0402-8

JEL Classification

Navigation