Abstract
According to Gibrat’s law, the growth rates of cities are expected to be independent of their sizes. In this study, we hypothesize that growth rates do depend on population size, but that the direction of the relationship depends on location, i.e., in unfavorable loci, growth rates are positively related to size, while the relationship is reversed in favorable loci, i.e., places with several location advantages. The present study examines that possibility, using 1990–2000 population growth data for two levels of geographic resolution—4,667 local administrative units (i.e., municipalities) and 2,189 contiguous urban areas in 40 European countries. According to our findings, when individual localities are considered, ‘proportionate’ growth (expected under Gibrat’s law) emerges at the aggregate (system-wide) level, but ‘dissipates’ when the settlement system is disaggregated into two urban sub-systems, formed by well-positioned localities and poorly positioned ones. Concurrently, for urban areas, a strong positive association between population size and growth emerges both before and after controlling for location attributes. However, this association between population size and growth is not especially strong, if favorably and unfavorably located urban areas are looked at separately.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ades AF, Glaeser EL (1995) Trade and circuses: explaining urban giants. Q J Econ 110(1): 195–227
Alonso W (1971) The economics of urban size. In: Friedman J, Alonso W (eds) Regional policy: theory and applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 334–450
Anderson G, Ge Y (2005) The size distribution of Chinese cities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 35(6): 756–776
Auerbach F (1913) Das Gesetz der Bevolkerungskonzeutration. Petermanns Mitteilungen 59:74–76 (cited in Nitsch V (2005) Zipf zipped. J Urban Econ 57:86–100)
Batty M (2006) Hierarchy in cities and city systems. In: Pumain D (eds) Hierarchy in natural and social sciences. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 143–168
Black D, Henderson V (2003) Urban evolution in the USA. J Econ Geogr 3: 343–372
Bode E (2008) Delineating metropolitan areas using land prices. J Reg Sci 48(1): 131–163
Brinkhoff T (2007) City population database. http://www.citypopulation.de
Cheshire PC, Magrini S (2006) Population growth in European cities: weather matters—but only nationally. Reg Stud 40(1): 23–37
Clark SJ, Stabler JC (1991) Gibrat’s law and the growth of Canadian cities. Urban Stud 28(4): 635–639
Córdoba JC (2008) On the distribution of city sizes. J Urban Econ 63: 177–197
Duranton G (1999) Distance, land, and proximity, economic analysis and the evolution of cities. Research Papers in Environmental and Spatial Analysis No 53. (Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics)
Eeckhout I (2004) Gibrat’s law for all cities. Am Econ Rev 94(5): 1429–1451
ESRI (2000) ESRI data and maps. Environmental Science Research Institute, Redlands
Eurostat (2008) Urban audit database—Inforegio. http://www.urbanaudit.org/DataAccessed.aspx. Accessed June 2008
Eurostat (2009) Local administrative units. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nuts/lau_en.html. Accessed Dec 2009
Fujita M, Tomoya M (1997) Structural stability and evolution of urban systems. Reg Sci Urban Econ 27: 399–442
Gabaix X (1999) Zipf’s law for cities: an explanation. Q J Econ 114: 739–767
Gallup JL, Sachs J, Mellinger A (1999) Geography and economic development. Int Reg Sci Rev 22: 179–232
Geonames (2007) Geonames project database (http://www.geonames.org)
Gibrat R (1931) Les inégalités économiques: applications aux inégalités des richesses, à la concentration des entreprises, aux populations des villes, aux statistiques des familles, etc., d’une loi nouvelle, la loi de l’effet proportionnel. Paris, Recueil Sirey (Cited in: Kalecki M (1945) On the Gibrat Distribution. Econometrica 13(2):161–170 and Moeckel R (2009) Simulation of firms as a planning support system to limit urban sprawl of jobs. Plann Des 36(5):883–905)
Glaeser EL (2005) Smart Growth: education, skilled work & the future of cold weather cities. In: John F (ed) Policy brief. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
Gotway C, Young LJ (2002) Combining incompatible spatial data. J Am Stat Assoc 97(48): 632–647
Guérin-Pace F (1993) Deux siècles de croissance urbaine. Paris, Anthropos (Cited in: Pumain D, Moriconi-Ebrard F (1997) City size distributions and metropolization. GeoJournal 43(3):307–314)
Henry MS, Barkley DL, Bao S (1997) The hinterland’s stake in metropolitan growth: evidence from selected southern regions. J Reg Sci 37(3): 479–501
Ioannides YM, Overman HG (2003) Zipf’s law for cities: an empirical examination. Reg Sci Urban Econ 33: 127–137
Ishikawa Y, Montanari A (eds) (2004) The new geography of human mobility: inequality trends. Societa Geographica Italiana, Rome
Kalecki M (1945) On the Gibrat distribution. Econometrica 13(2): 161–170
Karlsson C, Olsson M (2006) The identification of functional regions: theory, methods, and applications. Ann Reg Sci 40(1): 1–18
McGranahan G, Balk D, Anderson B (2007) The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environ Urban 19(1): 17–37
Minami M, ESRI (2000) Using ArcMap: GIS. Redlands, California
Nitsch V (2005) Zipf zipped. J Urban Econ 57: 86–100
Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem. In: Concepts and techniques in modern geography. Monograph series. Geo Books, London, pp 38–41
Partridge M, Bollman RD, Olfert MR, Alasia A (2007) Riding the wave of urban growth in the countryside: spread, backwash, or stagnation?. Land Econ 83(2): 128–152
Polese M, Shearmur R (2006) Growth and location of economic activity: the spatial dynamics of industries in Canada 1971–2001. Growth Change 37(3): 362–395
Portnov BA, Erell E (2001) Urban clustering: the benefits and drawbacks of location. Ashgate, Aldershot
Portnov BA, Schwartz M (2008) On the relativity of urban location. Reg Stud 42(4): 605–615
Portnov BA, Schwartz M (2009a) Urban clusters as growth foci. J Reg Sci 49(2): 287–310
Portnov BA, Schwartz M (2009b) On the importance of location package for urban growth. Urb Stud 46(8):1665–1679
Pumain D (1982) La dynamique des villes. Economica, Paris, 231 p cited in Suarez-Villa L (1988) Metropolitan evolution, sectoral economic change, and the city size distribution. Urb Stud 25:11–20
Pumain D, Moriconi-Ebrard F (1997) City size distributions and metropolization. GeoJournal 43(3): 307–314
Rappaport J (2006) Moving to nice weather. Reg Sci Urb Econ 37: 375–398
Reed WJ (2002) On the rank-size distribution for human settlements. J Reg Sci 42(1): 1–17
Robson BT (1973) Urban growth, an approach. Methuen, London, p p 268
Rose AK (2005) Cities and countries. In: NBER working paper series working paper 11762. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge
Rossi-Hansberg E, Wright MLJ (2007) Urban structure and growth. Rev Econ Stud 74: 597–624
Salway R, Wakefield J (2005) Sources of bias in ecological studies of non-rare events. Environ Ecol Stat 12: 321–347
Schwanen T (2002) Urban form and commuting behaviour: a cross-European perspective. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 93(3): 336–343
Strutzer A, Frey BS (2004) Stress that doesn’t pay: the commuting paradox. Discussion Paper Series IZA DP No. 1278
UNEP and UNESCO (2004) Millennium ecosystem assessment report. UNESCO, New York
Vaturi A, Portnov BA, Schwartz M (2004) Internal migration and fiscal capacity of local authorities: a case study of the Greater Tel Aviv Metropolitan Area, 1985-1997. Space Polity 8(1): 61–85
Vlora NR (1979) Città et territorio. Bologne: Pàtron (Cited in: Pumain, D (2000) Settlement systems in the evolution. Geogr Ann 82B(2):73–87)
Zipf GK (1932) Selected studies of the principle of relative frequency in language. Mass, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Portnov, B.A., Reiser, B. & Schwartz, M. Does Gibrat’s law for cities hold when location counts?. Ann Reg Sci 48, 151–178 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0402-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0402-8