Advertisement

The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 469–486 | Cite as

Exploring the sources of labour productivity growth and convergence in the Italian regions: some evidence from a production frontier approach

  • Davide PiacentinoEmail author
  • Erasmo Vassallo
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper investigates labour productivity growth and regional convergence patterns in Italy over the time span 1982–2000. Starting from some evidence of spatial polarisation within Italian economy, the analysis aims at exploring the sources of this tendency. To this end, an approach based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) production frontiers is employed which allows to decompose labour productivity growth into efficiency change, technological progress and capital deepening, looking then at the relative contribution of each component to regional convergence. Moreover, some measures of human capital and public capital are used as augmentation factors of the conventional inputs. The study leads to the conclusion that polarisation is mainly due to regional differences in efficiency change.

JEL Classification

C14 H54 O47 R11 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiello F, Scoppa V (2006) Convergence and regional productivity divide in Italy: evidence from panel data. In: Proceedings of XXVII Italian regional science association conference, PisaGoogle Scholar
  2. Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100: 223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bils M, Klenow P (2000) Does schooling cause growth?. Am Econ Rev 90: 1160–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman AW, Azzalini A (1997) Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: the Kernel approach with s-plus illustrations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Caves D, Christensen L, Diewert W (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica 50: 1393–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the inefficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2: 429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charnes A, Cooper W, Golany B, Seiford L, Stutz J (1985) Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient production functions. J Econom 30: 91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciccone A (2004) Human capital as a factor of growth and employment at the regional level. The case of Italy. In: Report for the European Commission, DG for Employment and Social Affairs, European Commission, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper W, Seiford L, Zhu J (eds) (2004) Handbook on data envelopment analysis international series in operations research and management science. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper W, Seiford L, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Durlauf SN, Johnson PA, Temple JRW (2005) Growth econometrics. In: Aghion P, Durlauf SN (eds) Handbook of economic growth, vol 1A.. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 555–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fazio G, Piacentino D, Vassallo E (2008) Divari economici e variabili di contesto. Un’analisi non parametrica per le regioni italiane. Rivista di Economia e Statistica del Territorio - Rev Econ Stat Regional Stud 2: 44–80Google Scholar
  13. Henderson D, Russell R (2005) Human capital and convergence: a production-frontier approach. Int Econ Rev 44: 1167–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henderson D, Tochkov K, Badunenko O (2007) A drive up the capital coast? Contributions to post-reform growth across Chinese Provinces. J Macroecon 29: 569–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iezzi S (2006) La polarizzazione territoriale del prodotto pro capite: un’analisi del caso italiano sulla base di dati provinciali. In: Temi di discussione, Banca d’Italia, p 611Google Scholar
  16. ISTAT (2005) Conti economici regionali anni 1980–2004. Istat, RomaGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar S, Russell R (2002) Technological change, technological catch-up and capital deepening: relative contributions to growth and convergence. Am Econ Rev 92: 527–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leonida L, Petraglia C, Murillo-Zamorano L (2004) Total factor productivity and the convergence hypothesis in the Italian regions. App Econ 36: 2187–2193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maffezzoli M (2006) Convergence across Italian regions and the role of technological catch-up. B.E. J Macroecon (Topics) 6: 1–45Google Scholar
  20. Magrini S (2007) Analysing convergence through the distribution dynamics approach: why and how? In: Working Paper Department of Economics, University of Venice, p 13Google Scholar
  21. Malmquist S (1953) Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trab Estad 4: 209–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. OECD (2007) Economic survey of Italy 2007. Oecd, ParisGoogle Scholar
  23. Paci R, Saddi S (2002) Capitale pubblico e produttività nelle regioni italiane. In: Working Paper CRENOS, University of CagliariGoogle Scholar
  24. Piacentino D (2008) Productivity, infrastructures and convergence: panel data evidence on Italian regions. Scienze Regionali Italian J Reg Sci 2: 5–26Google Scholar
  25. Quah D (1993) Galton’s fallacy and test of the convergence hypothesis. Scand J Econ 95: 427–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Salinas-Jiménez M (2003) Technological change, efficiency gains and capital accumulation in labour productivity growth and convergence: an application to the spanish regions. App Econ 35: 1839–1851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Salinas-Jiménez M, Alvarez-Ayuso I, Delgrado-Rodrìgue J (2006) Capital accumulation and TFP growth in the EU: a production frontier approach. J Policy Model 28: 195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scoppa V (2007) The quality of human and physical capital and technological gaps across Italian regions. Reg Stud 41: 585–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shephard R (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Statistica e Matematica per la Ricerca EconomicaUniversità degli Studi di Napoli “Parthenope”NapoliItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Contabilità Nazionale e Analisi dei Processi SocialiUniversità degli Studi di PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations