Skip to main content
Log in

Interregional migration, self-selection and the returns to education in Brazil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last decade Brazil has seen an astonishing reversal in the original north-east-to-south-east direction of migration. Within a framework of human capital and self-selection theory we try to identify the individual characteristics and motivations linked to the migration pattern. The overall results of this procedure suggest that there is a key difference between NE \({\Rightarrow }\) SE movers and SE \({\Rightarrow }\) NE movers. (1) SE \({\Rightarrow }\) NE movers were adverse self-selected in terms of observable education characteristics. (2) No self-selection could be observed among migrants in the NE \({\Rightarrow }\) SE direction. In general the North-East seems less attractive to highly skilled people. (3) Labor market segmentation with respect to sector occupation is likely. (4) There are clear differences in income determinants between movers and non movers. The majority of migrants except for migrants with higher education cannot expect to realize a return to education comparable to the average in the region of departure or destination. However, in the context of the Borjas selection model the returns to education analysis would predict a different pattern of migrant selectivity than the one observed in Brazil. Apart from soft characteristics connected to the regions we believe, that the large share of the non formal labor market is likely to indicate a surplus labor leading to a migration pattern different than expected from selection theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azzoni CR (2001) Economic growth and regional income inequality in Brazil. Ann Reg Sci 35(1): 133–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzoni CR, Servo LM (2002) Education, cost of living and regional wage inequity in Brazil. Papers Reg Sci 81(2): 157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas GJ (1987) Self-selection and the earnings of immigrants. Am Econ Rev 77(4): 531–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas GJ, Bronars SG, Trejo SJ (1992) Self-selection and internal migration in the United States. J Urban Econ 32(2): 159–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiquiar D, Hanson GH (2005) International migration, self-selection, and the distribution of wages: evidence from Mexico and the United States. J Polit Econ 113(2): 239–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick B (1999) Are immigrants favorably self-selected?. Am Econ Rev 89(2): 181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl GB (2002) Mobility and the return to education: testing a Roy model with multiple markets. Econometrica 70(6): 2367–2420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiess NM, Verner D (2003) Migration and Human Capital in Brazil during the 1990s, The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series, 3093

  • Golgher AB, Rosa CH, Araújo AFdJ (2005) The Determinants of Migration in Brazil, Discussion Paper 286

  • Graham DH (1970) Divergent and convergent regional economic growth and internal migration in Brazil, 1940–1960. Econ Dev Cult Change 18(3): 362–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1): 153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J (2004) Are migrants more skilled than non-migrants? Repeat, return, and same employer migrants. Can J Econ 37(4): 830–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (2004) Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicilios, IBGE 2004

  • Jong GFD (2000) expectations, gender, and norms in migration decision-making. Popul Stud 54(3): 307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurini M, Andrade E, Pereira PL (2005) Income convergence clubs for Brazilian municipalities: a non-parametric analysis. Appl Econ 37(18): 2099–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin G (1997) Elderly migration: household versus individual approaches. Papers Reg Sci 76(3): 285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto da Cunha JM (2002) The use of PNAD in migratory analysis: possibilities. lacks and methodological challenges. IPEA working paper no. 875, April 2002

  • Roy AD (1951) Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxford Econ Papers 3: 135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos EdRd, Menezes-Filho N, Ferreira PC (2005) Migracao, selecao e diferencas regionais de renda no Brasil. Pesquisa e Planejamento Economico 35(3): 299–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjaastad LA (1962) The costs and returns of human migration. J Polit Econ 70(5): 80–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner F, Ward JO (1980) Urbanization and migration in Brazil. Am J Econ Sociol 39(3): 249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yankow JJ (2002) Does distance matter? A comparison of boundary and distance-based measures of internal migration. J Econ Social Meas 28(3): 161–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Yap LY (1976) Internal migration and economic development in Brazil. Q J Econ 90(1): 119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Gries.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gries, T., Kraft, M. & Pieck, C. Interregional migration, self-selection and the returns to education in Brazil. Ann Reg Sci 46, 707–732 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0344-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0344-1

JEL Classification

Keywords

Navigation