The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 379–400 | Cite as

Spatial disparities across the regions of Turkey: an exploratory spatial data analysis

Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to perform an exploratory spatial data analysis on the growth and development level of the 76 Turkish regions over 1995–2001. While our choropleth maps indicate that the Western part of the country is significantly more developed than the East, the tools of spatial statistics reveal the presence of spatial dependence across provinces. The presence of heterogeneity is reflected in the distribution of Local Indicators of Spatial Association statistics. Overall, our results shed new light on the distribution of growth across Turkish regions and its relation with public investments and human capital, two indicators of development.

JEL Classification

O18 R11 R58 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akgungor S (2003) Exploring regional specializations in turkey’s manufacturing industry. Regional studies association international conference, Pisa, Italy, April 12–15Google Scholar
  2. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin L (1995) Local indicator of spatial association–LISA. Geogr Anal 27: 93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anselin L (1999) Interactive techniques and exploratory spatial data analysis. In: Longley PA, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW (eds) Geographic information system: principles, techniques, management and applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Anselin L, Sridharan S, Gholston S (2007) Using exploratory spatial data analysis to leverage social indicator databases: the discovery of interesting patterns. Soc Indic Res 82: 287–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anselin L, Syabri I, Kho Y (2006) GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis. Geogr Anal 38: 5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arslan I, Wijnbergen S (1993) Export incentives, exchange rate policy and export growth in turkey. Rev Econ Stat 75(1): 128–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Atalik G (1990) Some effects of regional differentiation on integration in the European community. Papers Reg Sci Assoc 69: 11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ates S, Erk N, Direkci T (2000) Convergence and growth within GAP (South Eastern Anatolia Project) Region and Overall Turkey’s Regions. http://www.econturk.org/sanli8.pdf, International METU Conference in Economics IV, September 13–16, Ankara
  10. Balkir C (1995) Less development regions and regional development policies in Turkey. European Urban and Regional Studies, SAGE Publications, 1995/2; pp. 253–264Google Scholar
  11. Battisti M, Di Vaio G (2008) A spatially filtered mixture of β-convergence regressions for EU regions, 1980–2002. Emp Econ 34: 105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berber M, Yamak R, Artan S (2000) Turkiye’de yakinlasma hipotezinin bolgeler bazinda gecerliligi uzerine ampirik bir calisma: 1975–1997, Ulusal Bolge Bilimi Kongresi—Bildiri Kitabi 9:51–59, TrabzonGoogle Scholar
  13. Chambers J, William C, Beat K, Tukey P (1983) Graphical methods for data analysis. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  14. Dall’erba S (2005) Distribution of regional income and regional funds in Europe 1989–1999: an exploratory spatial data analysis. Ann Reg Sci 39: 121–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dall’erba, Le Gallo J (2008) Regional convergence and the impact of structural funds over 1989–1999: a spatial econometric analysis. Papers in regional science (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  16. Deliktas E, Önder AÖ, Karadag M (2008) The spillover effects of public capital on the Turkish private manufacturing industries in the Geographical Regions. Ann Reg Sci. doi:10.1007/s00168-008-0220-4
  17. Dogruel F, Dogruel S (2003) Türkiye’de bölgesel gelir farkliliklari ve büyüme. In: Iktisat Uzerine Yazilar—Korkut Boratav’a Armagan, Iletisim Yayinlari, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  18. Drabenstott M (2006) Rethinking federal policy for regional economic development. Econ Rev 91(1): 115–142Google Scholar
  19. Elveren AY, Galbraith JK (2008) Pay inequality in Turkey in the Neo-Liberal Era: 1980–2001. University of Texas Inequality Project Working Paper No. 49, April 21Google Scholar
  20. Ertugal E (2005) Strategies for regional development: challenges facing turkey on the road to EU membership. Turkish Policy Quarterly 4(3), FallGoogle Scholar
  21. Ezcurra R, Iraizoz B, Pascual P, Rapún M (2007a) Spatial disparities in the European agriculture: a regional analysis. Applied Economics, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  22. Ezcurra R, Pascual P, Rapún M (2007b) Spatial disparities in the European union: an analysis of regional polarization. Ann Reg Sci 41: 401–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feridun M, Sezgin S (2008) Regional underdevelopment and terrorism: the case of south eastern Turkey. Defence Peace Econ 19(3): 225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gezici F, Hewings G (2003) Spatial analysis of regional inequalities in Turkey. In: 43rd congress of european regional science, 27–30 August 2003, Jyvaskyla, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  25. Gezici F, Hewings G (2004) Regional convergence and the economic performance of peripheral areas in Turkey. RURDS 16(2): 113–132Google Scholar
  26. Haining R (1990) Spatial data analysis in the social and environmental sciences. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensen L, Yang TC, Matthews SA (2006) Spatial inequality in Chile: stasis and change. Population Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  28. Karaca O (2004) Türkiye’de Bölgeler Arasi Gelir Farkliliklari: Yakinsama Var mi? Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu (Turkish Economy Association), http://www.tek.org.tr
  29. Keles R (1985) The effects of external migration on regional development in Turkey. In: Hudson R, Lewis J (eds) Uneven development in southern Europe: studies of accumulation, class, migration and the state. Methuen Publishing, London, , pp 54–75Google Scholar
  30. Kirdar M, Saracoglu S (2007) Migration and regional convergence: an Empirical investigation for Turkey. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2648/, MPRA Paper No. 2648
  31. Le Gallo J, Ertur C (2003) Exploratory spatial data analysis of the distribution of regional per capita GDP in Europe, 1980–1995. Papers Reg Sci 82(2): 175–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leinhardt G, Leinhardt S (1980) Exploratory data analysis: new tools for the analysis of empirical data. Rev Res Educ 8: 85–157Google Scholar
  33. Magalhaes A, Hewings G, Azzoni CR (2005) Spatial dependence and regional convergence in Brazil. Investigaciones Regionales 6:5–20Google Scholar
  34. Manfred FM, Fröhlich J, Gassler H, Varga A (2001) The role of space in the creation of new technological knowledge in Austria: an exploratory spatial data analysis. In: Manfred FM, Fröhlich J (eds) Knowledge, complexity and innovation systems. Springer, Berlin, , pp 124–145Google Scholar
  35. Molle W (2007) European cohesion policy. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Özaslan M, Dinçer B, Özgür H (2006) Regional disparities and territorial indicators in Turkey: Socio-economic development index (SEDI). The department of planning and regional development, university of thessaly and the Greek section of ERSA, 46th Congress of the European Regional Science Association (ERSA): Enlargment, Southern Europe, and the Mediterranean, Volos, Greece, 30 August to 3 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  37. Ozturk I (2002) Economic and social issues of east and southeast Turkey: policy implications. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1582/, MPRA Paper No. 1582
  38. Rey SJ (2001) Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence. Geogr Anal 33: 194–214Google Scholar
  39. Rey SJ, Montouri BD (1999) US regional income convergence: a spatial econometric perspective. Reg Stud 33: 143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Senesen U (2002) Türkiye’de Bölgesel Gelir Dagiliminda Son Gelismeler. 10. Ulusal Bölge Bilimi-Bölge Planlama Kongresi, 17-18 Ekim 2002, ITÜ Mimarlik Fakültesi, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  41. State Planning Organization (SPO), First five-year national development plan (1963–1967), http://www.spo.gov.tr
  42. State Planning Organization (SPO), Second five-year national development plan (1968–1972), http://www.spo.gov.tr
  43. State Planning Organization (SPO), Third five-year national development plan (1973–1977), http://www.spo.gov.tr
  44. Tansel A, Gungor AD (2000) Provincial inequalities in school enrollments in Turkey. Economic Research Forum Working, Paper No. 2003Google Scholar
  45. Thompson JR (2003) John Tukey (1915–2000): Deconstructing Statistics. In: Barry AB, Edward JW (eds) Proceedings of the Sixth US Army conference on applied statistics, ACAS00/ThompsonJames/ThompsonJames.pdf, Accessed 21 August 2008Google Scholar
  46. TUGIK (Turkish Young Businessmen’s Confederation) Report (2008) (prepared by Prof. Mustafa Sonmez) Doğu ve Güneydoğu Anadolu’nun Gelişimi İçin ÇözümÖnerileri. http://www.tugik.org.tr/tuganasayfa.wc
  47. Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  48. Vadali S (2008) Toll roads and economic development: exploring effects on property values. Ann Reg Sci 42: 591–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Oort FG, Atzema OALC (2004) On the conceptualization of agglomeration economies: the case of new firm formation in the dutch ICT sector. Ann Reg Sci 38: 263–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Voss PR, Long DD, Hammer RB, Friedman S (2006) County child poverty rates in the US: a spatial regression approach. Popul Res Policy Rev 25: 369–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yildirim J, Ocal N (2006) Income inequality and economic convergence in Turkey. Trans Stud Rev 13(3): 559–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ying LG (2000) Measuring the spillover effects: some Chinese evidence. Papers Reg Sci 79: 75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative SciencesUniversity of DumlupinarKutahyaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Geography and Regional DevelopmentUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations