Skip to main content
Log in

Penetrating the knowledge filter in “rust belt” economies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript


A new model of economic growth introduces the knowledge filter between new knowledge and economically useful knowledge. It identifies both new ventures and incumbent firms as the mechanisms that penetrate the knowledge filter. Recent empirical work has shown that new firms are more proficient at penetrating the knowledge filter than are incumbent firms; however, the analysis has only examined expanding economies and has relied on purely cross-sectional regression methodologies. This study explores the role of new and incumbent firms in penetrating the knowledge filter utilizing recent developments in spatial panel estimation techniques to provide a more robust set of findings. The results suggest those new firms are more proficient at penetrating the knowledge filter in declining and growing regions alike.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Acs ZJ, Armington C (2006) Entrepreneurship, geography and american economic growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1987) Innovation, market structure, and firm size. Rev Econ Stat 69(4): 567–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs Z, Plummer L (2005) Penetrating the “knowledge filter” in regional economics. Ann Reg Sci 39: 439–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs Z, Varga A (2002) Geography, endogenous growth and innovation. Int Reg Sci Rev 25(1): 132–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs Z, Audretsch D, Braunerhjelm P, Carlsson B (2004) The missing link: the knowledge filter and endogenous growth. Center for Economic Policy Research, London, UK, December, no. 4783

  • Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Braunerhjelm P, Carlsson B (2005) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, Center for Economic Policy Research. London, UK, December, no. 5326

  • Anselin L, Bera A (1988) Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In: Cummings LL (eds) The handbook of applied economic statistics. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 237–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin A, Varga A, Acs Z (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high-technology innovation. J Urban Econ 42: 422–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K (1962) The economic implication of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stat 80: 155–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D, Feldman M (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev 86(3): 630–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Sala-I-Martin X, Blanchard OJ, Hall RE (1991) Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Pap Econ Act 1: 107–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsley D, Kuh E, Welsch R (1980) Regression diagnostics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard AB, Redding SJ, Schott PK (2006) Multi-product firms and product switching. NBER working papers, no. 12293

  • Braunerhjelm P (1999) Sunk costs, firm Size, and internationalization. Weltwirtsch Archiv 135(4): 657–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B (1999) Small business, entrepreneurship, and industrial dynamics. In: Acs ZJ (eds) Are small firms important? Their role and impact. Kluwer, Boston, pp 99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B, Fridh A-C (2002) Technology transfer in United States Universities: a survey and statistical analysis. J Evol Econ 12(1–2): 199–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B, Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Braunerhjelm P (2007) The knowledge filter, entrepreneurship and economic growth. Case Western Reserve University

  • Cohen W, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1): 128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2003) Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. Int Reg Sci Rev 26: 244–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek J (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35: 520–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson VJ (2003) Marshall’s scale economies. J Urban Econ 53(1): 1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • High S (2003) Industrial sunset: the making of North America’s rust belt, 1969–1984. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin D, Kao C (2003) Entrepreneurship and economic growth: the proof is in the productivity, Center for Policy Research – Working paper no. 50, available at

  • Jaffe A (1989) The real effects of academic research. Am Econ Rev 79(5): 957–970

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe A, Tratjenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108: 483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic B (2001) New technology and the small firm. Small Bus Econ 16(1): 53–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller W (2002) Geographic localization of international technology diffusion. Am Econ Rev 92(1): 120–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight F (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP (1997) Bayesian estimation of spatial autoregressive models. Int Reg Sci Rev 20: 113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP (1998) Spatial econometrics.

  • Lucas R (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22: 3–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelacci C (2003) Low returns in R&D due to the lack of entrepreneurial skills. Econ J 113: 207–

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1986) Increasing returns and economic growth. Am Econ Rev 94: 1002–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1990) Endogenous technical change. J Pol Econ 98: 71–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J (1911) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen entwicklung. English translation: The theory of economic development, harvard University Press, Cambridge

  • Shane S, Eckhardt J (2003) The individual-opportunity Nexus. In: Acs ZJ, Audretsch D. Handbook of entrepreneurship research. Boston, Kluwer, pp 161–194

  • Utterback JM, Abernathy W (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 33: 639–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varga A (1998) University research and regional innovation. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zoltan Acs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acs, Z., Plummer, L.A. & Sutter, R. Penetrating the knowledge filter in “rust belt” economies. Ann Reg Sci 43, 989–1012 (2009).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

JEL Classification