Abstract
The evaluation of transportation projects has traditionally been made by assessing changes in travel time, vehicle operating cost, and safety. The broader, long-term effects on economic development (job, income and business growth) are a concern of transportation planners and decision makers, but have often been overlooked due to the lack of a reliable impact-estimation methodology and/or data. This paper presents a quantitative tool that can be used at the project-development phase to estimate the economic-development impacts of different types of highway construction projects. Using data from Indiana, we develop models that can be used to estimate the effects of geographic location, accessibility, and other factors on the economic-development impacts of highway construction projects. Our models can also be used as a basis for programming and ranking a wide variety of highway construction projects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldrich L, Kusmin L (1997) Rural economic development: What makes rural communities grow? USDA-ERS Agricultural Information Bulletin, no. 737
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2003) User benefit analysis for highways, Washington, DC
Anselin L (1988). Spatial econometrics methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Anselin L, Florax R, Rey S (eds) (2004). Advances in spatial econometrics. Methodology, tools and applications. Springer, Berlin
Arsen D (1997). Is there really an infrastructure/economic development link?. In: Bingham, RD and Mier, R (eds) Dilemmas of urban economic development: issues in theory and practice, pp. Sage, Newbury Park
Aschauer DA (1990) Highway capacity and economic growth. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Economic Perspectives, 14(5)
Bell ME, McGuire TJ (1997) Macroeconomic analysis of the linkages between transportation investments and economic performance. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 389, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC
Boarnet M (1995). Highways and economic productivity: interpreting recent evidence. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley
Brigham Young University (2006) Assessing the economic impacts of transportation improvement projects. Prepared for Utah Department of Transportation Research and Development Division/Planning Division
Calspan-University of Buffalo Research Center, Inc. (2001) Handbook of economic development. Prepared for the New York State Department of Transportation, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York and Cambridge Systematics, Inc
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates, Inc. (1998a) Economic impacts of SR 26 and US 35 corridor improvements. Prepared for Indiana Department of Transportation, Indianapolis, IN
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates, Inc. (1998b) Economic impacts of US 31 corridor improvements. Prepared for Indiana Department of Transportation, Indianapolis, IN
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates, Inc. (2003) I-69 Evansville to Indianapolis, Indiana final environmental impact statement. Prepared for Indiana Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates, Inc. (2004) Economic impacts of Indiana’s statewide long-range transportation plan. Prepared for Indiana Department of Transportation, Indianapolis, IN
Chow GC (1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28(3): 591–605
Dalenberg D and Partridge M (1997). Public infrastructure and wages: Public capital’s role as a productive input and household amenity. Land Econ 73(2): 268–284
Duffy-Deno KT and Eberts RW (1991). Public infrastructure and regional economic development: a simultaneous equations approach. J Urban Econ 30(3): 329–343
Eberts RW (2000) Understanding the impact of transportation in economic development. Transportation in the New Millennium, Transportation Research Board, Committee on Transportation and Economic Development, Washington, DC
Economic Development Research Group, Inc. and Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2001) Using empirical information to measure the economic impact of highway investments. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
Evers GHM, Van Der Meer PH, Oosterhaven J and Polak JB (1987). Regional impacts of new transport infrastructure: a multi-sectoral potentials approach. Transportation 14(2): 113–126
Fan W, Treyz F and Treyz G (2000). An evolutionary new economic geography model. J Reg Sci 40(4): 671–695
Federal Highway Administration (1992) Secondary and cumulative impact assessment in the highway project development process. Prepared by Federal Highway Administration Project Development Branch, Washington, DC
Federal Highway Administration (2000) Highway performance monitoring system (HPMS) Field Manual. December
Fernald JG (1999). Roads to prosperity? Assessing the link between public capital and productivity. American Economic Association, Am Econ Rev 89(3): 619–638
Flyvbjerg B, Bruzelius N and Rothengatter W (2003). Megaprojects and risk: an anatomy of ambition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Forkenbrock DJ and Foster NSJ (1996). Highways and business location decisions. Econ Develop Q 10(3): 239–248
Forkenbrock DJ, Pogue TF, Foster NSJ, Finnegan DJ (1990) Road investment to foster local economic development. The Public Policy Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City
Glickman NJ (1977). Econometric analysis of regional systems: explorations in model building and policy analysis. Academic Press, New York
Hartgen DT and Kim JY (1998). Commercial development at rural and small-town interstate exits. Transp Res Rec 1649: 95–104
Huddleston JR and Pangotra PP (1990). Regional and local economic impacts of transportation investments. Transp Quart 44(4): 579–594
Indiana Department of Transportation (1996) 1995 Indiana household travel survey. Indianapolis, IN
Isserman A (1977). The location quotient approach to estimating regional economic impacts. J Am Inst Plann 43(1): 33–41
Jack Faucett Associates (1991) the highway economics requirements system. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
Kriesel W, McNamara K (1990) Improved measures of manufacturing attraction: The role of industrial site hedonic prices. Presented at the Annual Meeting of American Agricultural Economics Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Lombard PC, Sinha KC and Brown D (1992). Investigation of the relationship between highway infrastructure and economic development in Indiana. Transp Res Rec 1359: 76–81
McQuaid RW, Greig M, Smyth A and Cooper J (2004). The importance of transport in business’ location decisions. Napier University, Edinburgh
Moore T, Meck S and Ebenhoh J (2006). An economic development tool box. American Planning Association, Chicago
Munnell A (1990). Infrastructure investment and economic growth. J Econ Perspect 6: 189–198
Nadiri MI, Mamuneas TP (1998) Contribution of highway capital to output and productivity growth in the US economy and industries. Prepared for the Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
National Environmental Policy Act (1969) Project development. Prepared by Federal Highway Administration Environment and Planning Branch, Washington, DC
Pindyck RS and Rubinfeld DL (1998). Econometric models and economic forecasts 4th edn Irwin/McGraw-Hill
Pinnoi N (1993) Transportation and manufacturing productivity (transportation productivity and multimodal planning). Texas Transportation Institute, College Station
Quinet E and Vickerman R (2004). Principles of transport economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton
Safety Management System Software (2004) Version v1.0 User Manual, Prepared by G. Lamptey, S. Labi and K. C. Sinha for Indiana Department of Transportation. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Tarko A, Kanodia M (2003) Hazard elimination program: Volume 1—Research report, Volume 2—Guidelines for highway safety improvements in Indiana. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2003/19. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Tarko A, Sinha KC, Eranky S, Brown H, Roberts E, Scinteie R and Islam S (2000). Crash reduction factors for improvement activities in Indiana. JTRP Final Report. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Treyz F, Treyz G (2002) REMI policy insight model documentation version 6.0. Regional Economic Models, Inc., Amherst, MA
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (2004) Location quotient calculator–Year 2004
Washington SP, Karlaftis MG and Mannering FL (2003). Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis. Chapman& Hall, New York
Weisbrod G (2000) Current practices for assessing economic development impacts from transportation investments. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis 290. Prepared for Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC
Weisbrod G and Beckwith J (1992). Measuring economic development benefits for highway decision making: the Wisconsin case. Trans Quart 46(1): 57–79
Weisbrod G, Grovak M (2001) Alternative methods for valuing economic benefits of transportation projects. Paper prepared for the Transportation Association of Canada, Benefit Cost Analysis Symposium
Weisbrod G, Gupta M (2003) Overview of state economic development highway programs. Prepared for the Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
Weisbrod G, Weisbrod B (1997) Assessing the Economic Impacts of Transportation Projects. Transportation Research Circular 477, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
Weiss MH and Figura R (2003). Provisional typology of highway economic development projects. Transportation Research Board. Transportation Research Record 1839: 115–119
Zellner A (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. J Am Stat Assoc 57: 348–368
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gkritza, K., Sinha, K.C., Labi, S. et al. Influence of highway construction projects on economic development: an empirical assessment. Ann Reg Sci 42, 545–563 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0183-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0183-x