Abstract
The issue of the interplay between the two objectives of equity and efficiency for national policy-makers in charge of regional policy is becoming topical once again in regional economics. This paper first reviews this issue theoretically and looks at recent literature contributions to show that, although many advances have been made, little attention has been paid to the effects of regional structural differences on the trade-off between the two objectives. Then, to demonstrate that differences between the regions of which a country is composed may influence the results of the models, a new simple short-run two-country four-region model is introduced to study the trade-off (differentiating for different regional productivity and different strengths of agglomeration economies—which are innovatively modelled on the demand side). In this short-term model, the national policy-maker can affect entrepreneurship through the set-up costs of firms. Similarly to the traditional literature, for countries composed of identical regions, spatially dispersed allocations of public support to production are more efficient with low agglomeration economies whereas spatially concentrated allocations are more efficient with high agglomeration economies. As the regions become different, however, unbalanced allocations of public support to the most advanced region become more efficient even in the case of relatively weak agglomeration economies, until, when regions are sufficiently different, the most efficient allocation of public support to production is always concentrated in the most advanced territories. If some sort of compensating mechanisms were available, in the short-run the policy-makers could decide to support the competitiveness of the already more-productive regions and transfer income to the lagging ones. All these issues are studied with reference to southern Italy (“Mezzogiorno”) and eastern Germany (former DDR) in order to show not only the similarities with the model’s predictions but also the many differences, resulting from the far greater complexity of actual development processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akerlof GA, Rose AK, Yellen JL, Hessenius H, Dornbusch R, Guitian M (1991) East Germany in from the cold: the economic aftermath of currency union. Brookings Pap Econ Activ (1):1–105
Alesina A, Danninger S, Rostagno MV (1999) Redistribution through public employment: The case of Italy. NBER Working Paper (7387)
Andersson R (2005). The efficiency of Swedish regional policy. Ann Reg Sci 39: 811–832
Aquino A (2006). Mezzogiorno: Perché?. L’Industria 27(1): 15–40
Attanasio O, Padoa Schioppa Kostoris F (1991) Regional inequalities, migration and mismatch in Italy, 1960–1986. In: Attanasio O, Padoa F, Schioppa Kostoris (eds) Mismatch and Labour mobility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Baldwin RE (2001) The core-periphery model with forward looking expectations. Reg Sci Urban Econ (31):21–49
Baldwin R, Martin P and Ottaviano GIP (2001). Global income divergence, trade, and industrialization: the geograohy of growth take-offs. J Econ Growth 6: 5–37
Baldwin RE, Forslid R, Martin P, Ottaviano G and Robert-Nicoud F (2003). Economic Geography Public Policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Behrens K (2004). Agglomeration without trade: how non traded goods shape the space-economy. J Urban Econ 55: 68–92
Behrens K, Gaigné C, Ottaviano GIP, Thisse JF (2003) Interregional and international trade: seventy years after ohlin. CEPR Discussion Papers (4065)
Berliant M and ben Raa T (2004). Increasing returns and perfect competition: the role of land. J Urban Econ 56: 97–118
Boltho A, Carlin W, Scaramozzino P (1997) Will east Germany become a new Mezzogiorno? J Comp Econ (24):241–264
Brunello G, Lippi C, Ordine P (2001) Widening difference in internal regional unemployment. Labour Econ 8
Burda MC (2006). Factor reallocation in eastern Germany after reunification. Am Econ Rev 96(2): 368–374
Burda MC and Hunt J (2001). From reunification to economic integration: productivity and the labor market in eastern germany. Brookings Pap Econ Activ 2001(2): 1–71
Chenery H (1962). Development policies for southern Italy. Q J Econ 76: 515–547
Confindustria (2000) La dotazione infrastrutturale delle province italiane. Confindustria, Rome
Crozet M and Koenig Soubeyran P (2004). Eu enlargement and the internal geography of countries. J Comp Econ 32: 265–279
Davies S, Hallet M (2002) Interactions between national and regional development. HWWA Discussion Paper (207)
Dixit AK and Stiglitz JE (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67(3): 297–308
Dunford M (2002). Italian regional evolutions. Environ Plann A 34: 657–694
Dupont V (2007). Do geographical agglomeration, growth and equity conflict?. Pap Reg Sci 86(2): 193–213
Dupont V, Martin P (2003) Subsidies to poor regions and inequalities: some unpleasant arithmetic. CEPR Discussion Papers (3620)
EU Commission (2004) A new partnership for cohesion: convergence competitiveness cooperation. Third report on economic and social cohesion
Ezcurra R and Rapun M (2006). Regional disparities and national development revisited. Eur Urban Reg Stud 13(4): 355–369
Fratesi U and Riggi MR (2007). Does migration reduce regional disparities? The role of skill-selective flows. Rev Urban Reg Develop Stud 19(1): 78–102
Fujita M and Thisse JF (2002). Economics of agglomeration; cities, industrial location and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, London
Fujita M, Krugman P and Venables P (1999). The spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge
Funke M and Rahn J (2001). How efficient is eastern Germany?. Econ Transit 10(1): 201–223
Giesek A (2006). Prospettive per il processo di convergenza della germania est. L’Industria 27(1): 45–47
Grossman GM and Helpman E (1991). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Rev Econ Stud 58(1): 43–61
Guerrieri P and Iammarino S (2006). The rise of ‘many mezzogiorni’: an empirical assessment of the internal differentiation of Italian southern regions. Eur Urban Reg Stud 13(2): 167–178
Hallet M (2000) Regional specialisation and concentration in the EU. Economic Papers, European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs (No. 141)
Hallett AJH and Ma Y (1993). East Germany, west Germany and their Mezzogiorno problem: A parable for European economic integration. Econ J 103(417): 416–428
Higgins B (1988) Regional development and efficiency of the national economy. In: Higgins B, Savoie DJ (eds) Regional economic develoopment, essays in honour of Francois Perroux. Unwin Hyman, pp 193–224
Hurst C, Thisse J-F and Vanhoudt P (2000). What diagnosis for Europe’s ailing regions. EIB Papers 5(1): 9–30
Kanbur R and Rapoport H (2005). Migration selectivity and the evolution of spatial inequality. J Econ Geogr 5(1): 43–57
Krugman P (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3): 483–499
Lanaspa LF and Sanz F (1999). Regional policy and industrial location decisions. Urban Stud 36(3): 499–507
Lanaspa LF and Sanz F (2001). Multiple equilibria, stability and asymmetries in Krugman’s core-periphery model. Pap Reg Sci 80: 425–438
Lanaspa LF and Sanz F (2004). Regional policy and industrial location decisions. Investigaciones Econ 28(1): 67–87
Lanaspa LF, Pueyo F and Sanz F (2001). The public sector and the core-periphery model. Urban Stud 38(10): 1639–1649
Leach J (1996). Training, migration and regional income disparities. J Pub Econ 61: 429–443
Lombardini S (1992) Vecchi e nuovi problemi al sud. In: D’Antonio M (ed) Il Mezzogiorno d’Italia: sviluppo o stagnazione? Il Mulino, Bologna
Markusen A (1996). Interaction between regional and industrial policies: evidence from four countries. Int Reg Sci Rev 19(1–2): 49–77
Martin P (1998a). Can regional policies affect growth and geography in Europe?. World Econ 21: 757–774
Martin R (1998b) The new ‘geographical turn’ in economics: some critical reflections. Cam J Econ
Martin P (1999a). Are european regional policies delivering. EIB Papers 4(2): 10–23
Martin P (1999b). Public policies, regional inequalities and growth. J Pub Econ 73(1): 85–105
Martin P and Ottaviano GIP (1999). Growing locations: industry location in a model of endogenous growth. Europ Econ Rev 43: 281–302
Martin P and Rogers CA (1995). Industrial location and public infrastructure. J Int Econ 39(3–4): 152–166
Monfort P and Nicolini R (2000). Regional convergence and international integration. J Urban Econ 48: 286–306
Murata Y (2003). Product diversity, taste heteroeneity and geographic distribution of economic activities: market vs non-market interactions. J Urban Econ 53: 126–144
Ottaviano GIP (2001). Monopolistic competition, trade and endogenous spatial fluctuations. Reg Sci Urban Econ 31: 51–77
Ottaviano GIP and Thisse J-F (2002). Integration, agglomeration and the political economics of factor mobility. J Pub Econ 83: 429–456
Ottaviano GIP, Thisse J-F (2003) Agglomeration and economic geography. CEPR Discussion Papers (3838)
Ottaviano GIP, Tabuchi T and Thisse J-F (2002). Agglomeration and trade revisited. Int Econ Rev 43(2): 409–435
Paluzie E (2001). Trade policy and regional inequality. Pap Reg Sci 80: 67–85
Puga D (2002). European regional policies in light of recent location theories. J Econ Geog 2(4): 373–406
Richardson HW (1979). Regional economics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Sinn H-W (2001) Germany’s economic unification: an assessment after 10 years. NBER Working paper (7586)
Sinn H-W, Westermann F (2001) Two mezzogiornos. NBER Working Paper (8125)
Solow RM (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1): 65–94
Starrett D (1978). Market allocations of locational choice in a model with free mobility. J Econ Theory 17: 21–37
Taylor J and Wren C (1997). UK regional policy: an evaluation. Reg Stud 31(9): 835–848
Thisse J-F (2000). Agglomeration and regional imbalance: why? And is it bad. EIB Papers 5(2): 47–67
Trigilia C (1992). Sviluppo senza autonomia. Il Mulino, Bologna
Vanhove N (1999) Regional policy: a European approach. Ashgate
Williamson JG (1965). Regional inequality and the process of national development: a description of patterns. Econ Develop Cult Change 13: 3–45
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Discussions and comments from an anonymous referee, Marco Alderighi, Roberto Camagni, Roberta Capello and Andrés Rodríguez-Pose are gratefully acknowledged.