Skip to main content
Log in

Where do foreign firms locate in transition countries? An empirical investigation

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Firm-level data sets on foreign manufacturing plants in four Central and Eastern European Countries are used in this paper, to trace their location and estimate the determinants of their choice processes. A nested logit model as developed by McFadden (1974) is used in the analysis. A central focus of the analysis is foreign direct investment (FDI) which is a good indicator of where location of foreign investments is made. Several reasons explain the need for mapping the location of FDI. First of all, it facilitates understanding the real competitiveness of regions and countries in providing location advantages able to complement multi-national enterprises’ (MNE) specific advantages. Secondly, it directly shows the distribution of the benefits usually associated with FDI. Finally, an understanding of FDI location decisions is important for policy makers who believe that MNEs may offer a positive contribution to the economic development of disadvantaged areas and thus correct potential regional imbalances. The main results show that sector specific factors affect the choice of the final location. These unobserved characteristics influence both the determinants and the structure of MNEs location choice process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrios S, Gorg H, Strobl E (2003) Multinationals’ location choice, agglomeration economies and public incentives. CORE Discussion paper no. 17

  • Bartik T (1985) Business location decisions in the United States: estimates of the effects of unionization, taxes, and other characteristics of states. J Bus Econ Stat 3(1):14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile R, Castellani D, Zanfei A (2003) Location choices of multinational firms in Europe: the role of national boundaries and EU policy. Università degli studi di Urbino, Facoltà di economia, working paper no. 78

  • Bekes G (2004) Location of manufacturing FDI in Hungary: how important are business to business relationships? mimeo

  • Braunerhjelm P, Svensson R (1996) Host country characteristics and agglomeration in foreign direct investment. Appl Econ 28:833–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomstrom M, Kokko A (1997) How foreign investment affects host countries. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper no. 1745

  • Capello R (2007) Regional economics. London, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton D (1983) The location and employment choices of new firms: an econometric model with discrete and continuous endogenous variables. Rev Econ Stat 65:440–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung W, Alcacer J (2002) Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States. Manage Sci 48(12):1534–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin C, Terza J, Arromdee V (1991) State characteristics and the location of foreign direct investment within the United States. Rev Econ Stat 73:675–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly A, Zachary S (1979) Improved multiple choice models. In: Hensher D, Dalvi Q (eds) Identifying and measuring the determinants of mode choice. Teakfield, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Disdier AC, Mayer T (2003) How different is Eastern Europe? Structure and determinants of location choices by French firms in Eastern and Western Europe. J Comp Econ 32(2):280–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning J (1977) Trade, location of economic activity and MNE: a search for an eclectixc approach. In: Ohlin B, Hesselborn P, Wijkman (eds) The international allocation of economic activity. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M, Nijkamp P (1987) From static towards dynamic discrete choice modelling. A state of the art review. Reg Sci Urban Econ 17:3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman J, Gerlowski D, Silberman J (1992) What attracts foreign multinational corporations? Evidence from branch plant location in the United States. J Reg Sci 32(4):403–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A (2000), The Spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Thisse J (2002) Economics of agglomeration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Green WH (2003) Econometric analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut M (1959) Size of the markets versus transport costs in industrial location surveys and theory. J Ind Econ 8:172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães P, Figueiredo O, Woodward D (2000a) A tractable approach to the firm location decision problem. mimeo

  • Guimarães P, Figueiredo O, Woodward D (2000b) Agglomeration and the location of foreign direct investment in Portugal. J Urban Econ 47:115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães P, Figueiredo O, Woodward D (2002) Modelling industrial location decisions in US counties. NIMA, Universidade do Minho, working paper series no. 18

  • Hansen E (1987) Industrial location choice in Saõ Paulo, Brazil. A nested logit model. Reg Sci Urban Econ 17:89–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris C (1954) The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 64:315–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head C, Ries J, Swenson D (1999) Attracting foreign manufacturing: investment promotion and agglomeration. Reg Sci Urban Econ 29:197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head K, Mayer T (2004) Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union. Rev Econ Stat 86(4):959–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herriges J, Kling C (1995) An empirical investigation of the consistency of nested logit models with utility maximization. Am J Agric Econ I 77:875–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herriges J, Kling C (1996) Testing the consistency of nested logit models with utility maximization. Econ Lett 50(1):33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogenbirk A, Narula R (2004) Location and agglomeration of FDI in The Netherlands: implications for policy. MERIT—infonomics research memorandum series no. 006

  • Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3):484–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee B (1999) Calling patterns and usage of residential toll service under self selecting tariffs. J Regul Econ 16:45–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere J, Henscher D, Swait J (2000) Stated choice method. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann P (2002) Classical and neoclassical location-production models. In: McCann P (ed) Industrial location economics. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers in econometrics Academic, New York, pp 105–142

  • McFadden D (1978) Modelling the choice of residential location. In: Karlquist A, Lundquist L, Snickars F, Weibull JW (eds) Spatial interaction theory and planning models. North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp 75–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen J (1995) The boundaries of multinational enterprises and the theory of International trade. J Econ Perspect 9(2):169–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucchielli JL, Puech F (2004) Globalization, agglomeration and FDI location: the case of French firms in Europe. In: Mucchielli JL, Mayer T (eds) Multinational firms’ location and the new economic geography. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 35–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano GI (2003) Regional policy in the global economy: insights from the New Economic Geography. Reg Stud 37(6–7):665–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resmini L (2003) Economic integration, industry location and frontiers economies in transition countries. Econ Syst 27:204–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Resmini L (2004) Economic integration and industry location in transition countries. ZEI working paper no. B-10

  • Schmenner R, Huber J, Cook R (1987) Geographic differences and the location of new manufacturing facilities. J Urban Econ 21:83–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szalavetz A (2004) The role of FDI in fostering agglomeration and regional structural change in Hungary. EURECO working paper

  • Train K (1980) A structured logit model of auto ownership and mode choice. Rev Econ Stud 47:357–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train K (1986) Qualitative choice analysis: theory, econometrics and an application to the automobile demand MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Train K, MacFadden D, Ben-Akiva M (1987) The demand for local telephone service: a fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and service choices. Rand J Econ 18(1):109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2004) World investment report. United Nation, Geneva

  • UN-ECE (2001) Economic growth and foreign direct investments in the transition economies, chap 5, vol 1 Econ Surv Eur

  • Weber A (1929) Alfred Weber’s theory of the location of industries, Chicago, Ill., University of Chicago Press; translated from the original Über der Standort der Industrien, Tübingen, Mohr, 1909

  • Wisniewski A (2004) The impact of foreign direct investment on regional development. The case of Poland. EURECO working paper

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Resmini.

Additional information

This paper has been written as a part of the Research Network on “The Impact of the European Integration and Enlargement on Regional Structural Change and Cohesion”, financed by the European Commission through the 5th Framework Programme. The authors are grateful to the other members of the Research Consortium and the participants at the international workshop “Modelling the Entrepreneurial and Innovative Space-Economy” organized by the Tinbergen Institute on 22–23 August 2005 for very helpful comments and suggestions provided on an earlier version of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pusterla, F., Resmini, L. Where do foreign firms locate in transition countries? An empirical investigation. Ann Reg Sci 41, 835–856 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0144-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0144-4

JEL Classification

Navigation