Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The use of activity-based modeling to analyze the effect of land-use policies on travel behavior

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper suggests that in order to analyze the effect of land-use policies on travel behavior an integrated framework that extend travel activity-based models to include various land-use issues such as residential location and work place should be developed and use. The importance of analyzing various land-use policies on travel behavior is continuously increasing as various policies such as transit-oriented developments, mixed land-use, different concentrations schemes, and more broadly Smart Growth, are often suggested as a means to mitigate transportation problems. Given our limited understanding of the effects of the various land-use polices on travel behavior it is imported to develop better approaches to analyze such policies. Activity-based models, that treat travel as a derivation of the demand for personal activities, provides an opportunity to better understand travel behavior as the explicit modeling of activities and the consequent tours and trips enable a more credible analysis of responses to policies and their effect on traffic and air quality. The theoretical framework of activity-based models starts with urban and land-use development as inputs; however, there is a need to translate this framework to analyze specific land-use policies. This paper discusses the advantages and potential of activity-based models for analyzing the effect of land-use policies on travel behavior. It suggests improvements that will extend the general framework to achieve a better understanding of travelers’ responses to various land-use policies and shows its advantages over tip-based models, which simply do not have such capabilities. The improved activity-based approach is illustrated through a case study based on the Portland activity-based model combined with a stated-preference residential choice model. A package of land-use policies— including improved land-use, school quality, safety, and transit service in the city center—is introduced, and its effect on household redistribution and regional travel is tested using this integrated framework. The results of this case study show that the effects of the land-use policies introduced had only marginal effects on regional travel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arentze T, Timmermans HJP (2000) ALBATROSS: a learning-based transportation oriented simulation system. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven

    Google Scholar 

  • Axhausen KW, Garling T (1992) Activity-based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models and research problems. Trans Rev 12(4):323–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badoe DA, Miller EJ (2000) Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, their implications for modeling. Trans Res Part D Trans Environ 5(4):235–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagley MN, Mokhtarian PL (2000) The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: a structural equations modeling approach. In: Paper presented at the XI Pan-American conference on traffic and transportation engineering. Gramado, Brazil, May 2000

  • Ben-Akiva M, Bowman JL (1998a) Activity-based travel demand model systems. Equilib Adv Transp Model Kluwer, Boston, pp 27–46

  • Ben-Akiva M, Bowman JL (1998b) Integration of an activity-based model system and a residential location model. Urban Stud 35(7):1131–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M, Lerman SR (1997) Disaggregate travel and mobility choice models and measures of accessibility. In: Paper presented at the third international conference on behavioral travel modeling. Tanenda, Australia

  • Ben-Akiva M, Bowman JL, Goinath D (1996) Travel demand model system for the information era. Transportation 23:241–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat CR, Koppelman F (1999) A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research. Transportation 26:119–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boarnet M, Crane R (2001) The influence of land-use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 35(9):823–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boarnet MG, Sarmineto S (1998) Can land-use policy really affect travel behavior?. Urban Stud N 35(7):1155–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman JL, Bradley M, Shiftan Y, Lawton TK, Ben-Akiva M (1998) Demonstration of activity based model system for Portland in World transport research. In: Meersman H, Van de Voorde E, Winkelmans W (eds) Selected proceedings from the 8th World conference on transport research. Elsevier, Antwerp, Belgium, July

  • Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (1997) A system of activity-based models for Portland, Oregon. Draft report of a demonstration project for the FHWA transportation model improvement program

  • Cao X, Mokhtarian PL, Handy S (2007) Neighborhood design and vehicle type choice: evidence from Northern California. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ (in press)

  • Cervero R, (1989) America’s suburban centers: the land use-transportation link. Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Kockelman K (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp Res D 2(3):199–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane R (1996) On form versus function: will the new urbanism reduce traffic, or increase It. J Plan Edu Res 15:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane R (2000) The influence of Urban form on travel: an interpretative review. J Plan Lit 15(1):3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane R, Crepeau R (1998) Does neighborhood design influence travel? A behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data. Transp Res Part D Trans Environ 3:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong X, Ben-Akiva ME, Bowman JL, Walker JL (2006) Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 40(2):118–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy R, Fisher K (1996) Transportation, congestion and density: new insight. Transp Res Rec 1552: 89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettema D, Timmermans H (1997) Theories and models of activity patterns. In: Ettema D, Timmermans H (eds) Activity-based approaches to travel analysis. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank L, Pivo G (1994) Impact of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single-occupant vehicle, transit and walking. Transp Res Rec 1466:44–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurs KT, van Wee B (2004) Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. J Transp Geogr 12(2):127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy S (1996) Understanding the link between urban form and nonwork travel behavior. J Plan Edu Res N 15(3):183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy S, Cao X, Mokhtarian P (2005) Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transp Res Part D Trans Environ 10(6):427–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzclaw J (1990) Manhattanization versus sprawl: how density impacts auto use comparing five bay area communities. In: Proceedings of the eleventh international pedestrian conference. Boulder, Colorado, pp 99–106

  • Hunt JD, Kriger DS, Miller EJ (2005) Current operational Urban land-use transport modeling frameworks: a review. Transp Rev 25(3):329–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattak AJ, Rodriguez D (2005) Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: a case study in USA. Transp Res Part A Policy Prac 39(6):481-500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura R (1988) An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis: a review paper. Transportation 15:9–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura R, Pas EI, Lula CV, Lawton TK, Benson PE (1996) The sequenced activity mobility simulator (SAMS): an integrated approach to modeling transportation, land-use and air quality. Transp 23(3):267–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura R, Mokhtarian P, Laidet L (1997) A micro-analysis of land-use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco bay area. Transportation 24(2):125–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krizer KJ (2003) Neighborhood services, trip purpose, and tour-based travel. Transportation 30:387–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan M (1998) Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point based framework. Geogr Anal 30(3):191–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan M (1999) Gender and individual access to Urban opportunities: a study using space-time measures. Access Urban Oppor 51(2):210–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson D (1999) Space, time, life-stage, and the allocation of time. Transportation 26:141–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matt K, Arentze T (2003) Variation of activity patterns with features of the spatial context. In: Paper presented at the 82nd transportation research board annual meeting. Washington, DC, January 12–16

  • Miller HJ (1991) Modeling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 5:287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller EJ (1999) Measuring space-time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: basic theory and computational methods. Geogr Anal Anal 31:187–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller EJ, Kriger DS, Hunt JD (1998) Integrated Urban models for simulation of transit and land-use policies. Final report, transit cooperative Research Project H-12, Toronto. University of Toronto, Joint Program in Transportation, September (Web Document 9 at http://www4.nas.edu/trb/crp.nsf)

  • Miller EJ, Hunt JD, Abraham JE, Salvini PA (2004) Microsimulation Urban systems. Comp Environ Urban Syst 28:9–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman P, Kenworthy J (1989) Gasoline consumption and cities: a comparison of US Cities with a Global survey. J Am Plan Assoc 55(1):24–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman P, Kenworthy J (1999) The cost of automobile dependence: a global survey of Cities. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan S, McNally MG (1995) Accessibility of neotraditional neighborhoods: a review of design concepts, policies, and recent literature. Transp Res A 29A(2):87–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiftan Y (2003) Peoples’ evaluation of urban and suburban characteristics: a residential stated preference model. Int J Trans Econ 30(2):151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiftan Y, Suhrbier J (1998) The contribution of activity-based models to analyses of transportation control measures. In: Meersman H, Van de Voorde E, Winkelmans W (eds) World transport research, selected proceedings from the 8th World conference on transport research. Elsevier, Antwerp, Belgium, July

  • Wegener M (1994) Operational Urban models: state of the art. J Am Plan Assoc 60(1):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegener M (1998) Applied models of Urban land use, transport and environment, state of the art and future developments. In: Batten D, Kim TJ, Lundqvist L, Mattson LG (eds) Network infrastructure and the Urban environment: recent advances in land use/transportation modeling. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M (2005) Exploring the relationships between Urban form and nonwork travel through time use analysis. Landsc Urban Plan 73:244–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

    Yoram Shiftan

Authors
  1. Yoram Shiftan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoram Shiftan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shiftan, Y. The use of activity-based modeling to analyze the effect of land-use policies on travel behavior. Ann Reg Sci 42, 79–97 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0139-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0139-1

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Search

Navigation