Abstract
This paper introduces multinational firms in a new economic geography model. There, unskilled labor mobility leads to less concentration of production than skilled labor mobility does. This is in line with empirical evidence that agglomeration of production in Europe is less pronounced than in the United States. The different patterns in (skilled versus unskilled) labor mobility together with the presence of multinational firms form one explanation of the actual differences in the spreading of industries in Europe as compared to the US
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams RH (2003) International migration, remittances and the brain drain: a Study of 24 labor-exporting countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3069
Adsera A, Boix C (2000) Must we choose? European unemployment, American inequality, and the impact of education and labor market institutions. Eur J Polit Econ 16(4):611–638
Aiginger K, Leitner W (2002) Regional concentration in the USA and Europe: who follows whom? Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 138(4):1–28
Aiginger K, Rossi-Hansberg E (2005) Specialization and concentration: a note on theory and evidence. Princeton University, unpublished manuscript
Amiti M (1999) Specialization patterns in europe. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 135(4):573–593
Baldwin RE, Forslid R, Martin P, Ottaviano GIP, Robert-Nicoud F (2003) Economic geography and public policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Barba Navaretti G, Checchi D, Turrini A (2003) Adjusting labour demand: multinational vs. national firms a cross-european analysis. J Euro Econo Assoc 1(2–3):708–719
Bentivogli C, Pagano P (1999) Regional disparities and labour mobility: the Euro-11 versus the USA. Labour 13(3):737–760
Brülhart M, Torstensson J (1996) Regional integration, scale economies and industry location in the european union. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 1435
Carr DL, Markusen JR, Maskus KE (2001) Estimating the knowledge–capital model of the multinational enterprise. Am Econ Rev 91(3):693–708
Ciccone A (2002) Agglomeration-effects in Europe. Eur Econ Rev 46(2):213–227
Coppel J, Dumont J-C, Visco I (2001) Trends in immigration and economic consequences. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 284
Constant A, Massey DS (2005) Labor market segmentation and the earnings of German guestworkers. Popul Res Policy Rev 24(6):5–30
Dixit AK, Stiglitz JE (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67(3):297–308
De New JP, Zimmermann KF (1994) Blue collar labor vulnerability: wage impact on migrations. In: Steinmann G, Ulrich R (eds) The economic consequences of immigration to Germany. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 81-99
Ekholm K, Forslid R (2001) Trade and location with horizontal and vertical multi-region-firms. Scand J Econ 103(1):101–118
Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy – cities, regions, and international trade. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Gao T (1999) Economic geography and the department of vertical multinational production. J Int Econ 48(2):301–320
Geddes A (2003) Migration and the welfare state in Europe. Political Quart 74(1):150–162
Haaland JI, Kind HJ, Midelfart-Knarvik KH, Torstensson J (1999) What determines the economic geography of Europe? CEPR Discussion Paper Nr. 2072
Helpman E (1984) A Simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations. J Polit Econ 32(3):451–471
Hoffman AN, Markusen JR (2007) Investment liberalization and the geography of firm location. In: Brakman S, Garretsen H, (eds) Recent developments in international trade: globalization and the multinational enterprise. MIT Press, Cambridge
Kennan J, Walker JR (2003) The effect of expected income on individual migration decisions. NBER Working Paper No. 9585
Krugman P (1991a) Geography and trade. Leuven University Press. Leuven and Cambridge, Massachusetts
Krugman P (1991b) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3):483–499
Marshall A (1920) Principles of Economics. MacMillan, London
Markusen JR (1984) Multinationals, multi-plant economies, and the gains from trade. J Int Econ 16(3–4):205–226
Markusen JR (1997) Trade versus investment liberalization. NBER Working Paper No. 6231
Markusen JR (2002) Multinational firms and the theory of international trade. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Markusen JR, Maskus KE (2002) Discriminating among alternative theories of the multinational enterprise. Rev Int Econ 10(4):694–707
Markusen JR, Venables AJ (1998) Multinational firms and the new trade theory. J Int Econ 46(2):183–203
Markusen JR, Venables AJ (2000) The theory of endowment, intra-industry and multi-national trade. J Int Econ 52(2):209–234
Ottaviano GIP, Peri G (2005) Rethinking the gains from immigration: theory and evidence from the US. NBER Working Paper No. 11672
Ottaviano GIP, Thisse J-F (2002) Integration, agglomeration and the political economics of factor mobility. J Public Econ 83(3):429–456
Puga D (2002) European regional policies in light of recent location theory. J Econ Geography 2(4):372–406
Raybaudi-Massilia M (2000) Economic geography and multinational enterprise. Rev Int Econ 8(1):1–19
Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. Chap 4, pp 2119-2171. In: Henderson JV, Thisse J-F (eds) (2004) Handbook of regional science and urban economics, Vol 4, Elsevier, North-Holland
Rygiel P (2001) Destins immigrés: Cher, 1920–1980, Trajectoires d’Immigrés d’Europe, Annales littéraires de l’Université de Franche Comté, Besançon
Sapir A (2001) Who is afraid of globalization? The challenge of domestic adjustment in Europe and America. In: Porter RB, Sauvé P, Subramanian A, Zampetti AB (eds) (2001) Efficiency, equity, and legitimacy: the multilateral trading system at the millennium. Harvard University and Brookings Institution Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Egger, P., Gruber, S., Larch, M. et al. Knowledge–capital meets new economic geography. Ann Reg Sci 41, 857–875 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0129-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0129-3