Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of harvested and normal patellar tendons: a reliability analyses of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

This study compared the reliability (interchangeability) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US) examinations of the patellar tendon after using central third patellar tendon autografts during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Nineteen consecutive patients (7 women, 12 men) underwent bilateral MRI and US of the patellar tendons 27 (24–29) months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using ipsilateral central third patellar tendon autografts. Two experienced radiologists blinded to one another evaluated the examinations. Measurements of the length of the noninjured patellar tendon showed the greatest reliability between MRI and US, with no systematic difference (P=0.48), a small mean difference (–0.1 mm), and an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.74. The measurements of the thickness and width of the noninjured side were also judged as reliable. However, on the injured side a lower reliability was found between MRI and US. We conclude that MRI and US are reliable (interchangeable) methods only for evaluating noninjured patellar tendons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kartus, J., Rostgård-Christensen, L., Movin, T. et al. Evaluation of harvested and normal patellar tendons: a reliability analyses of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Art 8, 275–280 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670000132

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670000132

Navigation