Abstract
Purpose
Differentiating subtalar and ankle instability in the clinical setting is challenging. This study aims to analyze the rotational laxity of the subtalar joint bilaterally in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic ankle instability under simulated load and stress-induced position of the subtalar joint.
Methods
A case–control study was conducted using an adjustable load device (ALD). Patients with chronic ankle instability and healthy volunteers were included. Each subject underwent a CT scan under mechanical stress and simulated weight-bearing conditions, maintaining maximum eversion and inversion hindfoot positions. The images were obtained in a single model, allowing calculations of the motion vector as well as the helical axis. The helical axis was defined by a rotation angle and a translation distance.
Results
A total of 72 feet were included in the study. Thirty-one patients with unilateral symptoms and five healthy controls were selected, defining two groups: symptomatic (n = 31) and asymptomatic (n = 41). An absolute difference of 4.6º (95%CI 2–11.1) rotation angle was found on the helical axis of the symptomatic vs. asymptomatic group (p = 0.001). No significant differences were detected in the translation distance (n.s.) between the groups. Additionally, a significant positive correlation was found between the rotation angle and translation distance through the helical axis in the asymptomatic group (r = 0.397, p = 0.027).
Conclusion
Patients with chronic ankle instability suspected of having subtalar joint instability showed a wider subtalar range of laxity in terms of rotation about the helical axis. Furthermore, differences in kinematics between symptomatic and asymptomatic hindfeet was demonstrated when both feet were compared.
Level of evidence
III.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Besl PJ, McKay ND, Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(2):239–256. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.121791
Burssens A, Krähenbühl N, Lenz AL, Howell K, Zhang C, Sripanich Y, Saltzman CL, Barg A (2022) Interaction of loading and ligament injuries in subtalar joint instability quantified by 3D weightbearing computed tomography. J Orthop Res 40:933–944. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25126
Choisne J, Hoch MC, Alexander I, Ringleb SI (2017) Effect of direct ligament repair and tenodesis reconstruction on simulated subtalar joint instability. Foot Ankle Int 38(3):324–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100716674997
Choisne J, Ringleb SI, Samaan MA, Bawab SY, Naik D, Anderson CD (2012) Influence of kinematic analysis methods on detecting ankle and subtalar joint instability. J Biomech 45(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.10.015
Cignoni P, Callieri M, Cignoni P, Callieri M, Corsini M, Dellepiane M, Ganovelli F, Ranzuglia G (2008) MeshLab: an open-source mesh processing tool. Eurographics Ital Chapter Conf. https://doi.org/10.2312/LocalChapterEvents/ItalChap/ItalianChapConf2008/129-136
Herrera-Pérez M, González-Martín D, Vallejo-Márquez M, Godoy-Santos AL, Valderrabano V, Tejero S (2021) Ankle osteoarthritis aetiology. J Clin Med 10(19):4489. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194489
Herrera-Pérez M, Valderrabano V, Godoy-Santos AL, de César NC, González-Martín D, Tejero S (2022) Ankle osteoarthritis: comprehensive review and treatment algorithm proposal. EFORT Open Rev 7(7):448–459. https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-21-0117
Inman VT (1966) The human foot. Manit Med Rev 46(8):513–515
Jung HG, Moon SG, Yoon DY, Jang H, Kang JH (2021) Feasibility of MRI for the evaluation of interosseous ligament vertical segment via subtalar arthroscopy correlation: comparison of 2D and 3D MR images. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):869. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04759-8)
Kang DH, Kang C, Hwang DS, Song JH, Song SH (2019) The value of axial loading three dimensional (3D) CT as a substitute for full weightbearing (standing) 3D CT: Comparison of reproducibility according to degree of load. Foot Ankle Surg 25(2):215–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2017.10.014
Kikinis R, Pieper SD, Kikinis R, Pieper SD, Vosburgh KG (2014) 3D Slicer: a platform for subject-specific image analysis, visualization, and clinical support. Intraoperative imaging and image-guided therapy. Springer, New York, pp 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7657-3_19
Krähenbühl N, Burssens A, Davidson NP et al (2019) Can weightbearing computed tomography scans be used to diagnose subtalar joint instability? A cadaver study. J Orthop Res 37(11):2457–2465. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24420
Krähenbühl N, Horn-Lang T, Hintermann B, Knupp M (2017) The subtalar joint: a complex mechanism. EFORT Open Rev 2(7):309–316. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.160050
Krähenbühl N, Lenz AL, Lisonbee R, Deforth M, Zwicky L, Hintermann B, Saltzman CL, Anderson AE, Barg A (2019) Imaging of the subtalar joint: a novel approach to an old problem. J Orthop Res 37(4):921–926. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24220
Lintz F, Ricard C, Mehdi N, Laborde J, Bernasconi A, Richardi G, Sans N (2023) Hindfoot alignment assessment by the foot-ankle offset: a diagnostic study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(5):2373–2382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04440-2
Michels F, Clockaerts S, Van Der Bauwhede J, Stockmans F, Matricali G (2020) Does subtalar instability really exist? A systematic review. Foot Ankle Surg 26(2):119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2019.02.001
Michels F, Vereecke E, Matricali G (2023) Role of the intrinsic subtalar ligaments in subtalar instability and consequences for clinical practice. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 11:1047134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1047134
Mittlmeier T, Rammelt S (2018) Update on subtalar joint instability. Foot Ankle Clin 23(3):397–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2018.04.005
Newman TS, Yi H (2006) A survey of the marching cubes algorithm. Comput Graph 30:854–879
Peña Fernández M, Hoxha D, Chan O, Mordecai S, Blunn GW, Tozzi G, Goldberg A (2020) Centre of rotation of the human subtalar joint using weight-bearing clinical computed tomography. Sci Rep 10(1):1035. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57912-z
Pereira BS, Andrade R, Espregueira-Mendes J, Marano RPC, Oliva XM, Karlsson J (2021) Current concepts on subtalar instability. Orthop J Sports Med 9(8):23259671211021350. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211021352
Sangeorzan A, Sangeorzan B (2018) Subtalar joint biomechanics: from normal to pathologic. Foot Ankle Clin 23(3):341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2018.04.002
Shazadeh Safavi P, Janney C, Jupiter D, Kunzler D, Bui R, Panchbhavi VK (2019) A systematic review of the outcome evaluation tools for the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Spec 12(5):461–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640018803747
Sheehan FT, Seisler AR, Siegel KL (2007) In vivo talocrural and subtalar kinematics: a non-invasive 3D dynamic MRI study. Foot Ankle Int 28(3):323–335. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0323
Tejero S, Fernández-Marín R, González-Martín D, Vallejo-Márquez M, Paulano-Godino F, Herrera-Pérez M (2023) Hindfoot motion through helical axis image-based on dynamic CT scan using an original simulated weightbearing device. Foot Ankle Surg S1268–7731(23):00027–00029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2023.02.001
Togashi R, Edama M, Shagawa M et al (2023) Relationship between joint and ligament structures of the subtalar joint and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20(4):3075. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043075
van Eijnatten M, van Dijk R, Dobbe J, Streekstra G, Koivisto J, Wolff J (2018) CT image segmentation methods for bone used in medical additive manufacturing. Med Eng Phys 51:6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.10.008
Wang J, Zhang D, Zhao T, Ma J, Jin S (2021) Effectiveness of balance training in patients with chronic ankle instability: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 11(9):e053755. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053755
Wang S, Qian Z, Liu X et al (2023) Intrinsic kinematics of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints during human walking based on dynamic biplanar fluoroscopy. J Bionic Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-023-00368-4
Yang S, Canton SP, Hogan MV, Anderst W (2021) Healthy ankle and hindfoot kinematics during gait: sex differences, asymmetry and coupled motion revealed through dynamic biplane radiography. J Biomech 116:110220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110220
Ye D, Sun X, Zhang C, Zhang S, Zhang X, Wang S, Fu W (2021) In vivo foot and ankle kinematics during activities measured by using a dual fluoroscopic imaging system: a narrative review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 9:693806. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.693806
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Eloisa Rubio Pérez (Methodological and Statistical Management Unit - Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío) her invaluable assistance in the methodology and statistical analysis of this work.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors were equally involved in the development of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical approval
The study received ethical approval from the Virgen del Rocío’s Centre for Investigation Ethics Comitee (2012PI/060) and all methods were performed according to the regulations.
Informed consent
All patients signed the informed consent form.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fernández-Marín, M.R., González-Martín, D., Herrera-Pérez, M. et al. Increased subtalar rotational motion in patients with symptomatic ankle instability under load and stress conditions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 5214–5221 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07553-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07553-2