Abstract
Purpose
There is considerable debate regarding the optimal method of fixation for lateral meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT), with bone bridge techniques technically harder but allowing maintenance of root attachments, while soft tissue techniques are potentially more challenging for healing. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of the bone bridge and soft tissue techniques for lateral MAT in terms of failure, re-operation rate, complications and patient reported outcomes.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for patients undergoing primary lateral MAT with a minimum of 12-month follow-up. Patients following surgery utilising the bone bridge technique (BB) were compared with historical control patients who underwent MAT with the soft tissue technique (ST). Outcome was assessed by failure rate, defined as removal or revision of the meniscus transplant, survivorship by Kaplan–Meir analysis, re-operation rates, and other adverse event. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared using data at the 2-year point or 1 year if not reached 2 years.
Results
One-hundred and twelve patients following lateral meniscal transplants were included, 31 in the BB group and 81 in the ST historical control group, with no differences in demographics between both groups. Median follow-up for the BB group was 18 (12–43) months compared to 46 (15–62) months for the ST group. There were 3 failures (9.6%) in the BB group v 2 (2.4%) in the ST group (n.s.) with a mean time to failure of 9 months in both groups. 9 patients (29%) required a re-operation (all cause) in the BB group v 24 patients (29.6%) in the ST group (n.s). There was no difference in complications between both groups. There was significant improvement (p < 0.0001) in all PROMs (Tegner, IKDC, KOOS and Lysholm) between baseline and 2-year follow-up for both groups but no between-group differences.
Conclusion
Lateral MAT has a high success rate for symptomatic meniscal deficiency with significant benefits irrespective of the fixation technique. There is no advantage in performing the more technically demanding BB technique over ST fixation.
Level of evidence
Level 2.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data is available as required.
References
Elattar M, Dhollander A, Verdonk R, Almqvist KF, Verdonk P (2011) Twenty-six years of meniscal allograft transplantation: is it still experimental? A meta-analysis of 44 trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:147–157
Heckman MG, Davis JM, Crowson CS (2022) Post hoc power calculations: an inappropriate method for interpreting the findings of a research study. J Rheumatol 49:867–870
Kaarre J, Herman ZJ, Zsidai B, Grassi A, Zaffagnini S, Samuelsson K, Musahl V (2022) Meniscus allograft transplantation for biologic knee preservation: gold standard or dilemma? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07187-w
Monllau JC, Ibañez M, Masferrer-Pino A, Gelber PE, Erquicia JI, Pelfort X (2017) Lateral capsular fixation: an implant-free technique to prevent meniscal allograft extrusion. Arthrosc Tech 6:e269–e274
Myers P, Tudor F (2015) Meniscal allograft transplantation: how should we be doing it? A systematic review. Arthroscopy 31:911–925
Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (2016) Long-term survivorship and function of meniscus transplantation. Am J Sports Med 44:2330–2338. Accessed 21 Feb 2022
Pollard ME, Kang Q, Berg EE (1995) Radiographic sizing for meniscal transplantation. Arthroscopy 11:684–687
Rosso F, Bisicchia S, Bonasia DE, Amendola A (2015) Meniscal allograft transplantation: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 43:998–1007
Smith NA, Costa ML, Spalding T (2015) Meniscal allograft transplantation: rationale for treatment. Bone Joint J 97-B:590–594
Su L, Garcia-Mansilla I, Kelley B, Arshi A, Fabricant PD, Sherman SL, Jones KJ (2022) Clinical outcomes of meniscal allograft transplantation with respect to the minimal clinically important difference. Am J Sports Med 50:3440–3446
Yow BG, Donohue M, Tennent DJ (2021) Meniscal allograft transplantation. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 29:168–172
Smith NA, MacKay N, Costa M, Spalding T (2015) Meniscal allograft transplantation in a symptomatic meniscal deficient knee: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:270–279
Jauregui JJ, Wu ZD, Meredith S, Griffith C, Packer JD, Henn RF (2018) How should we secure our transplanted meniscus? A meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 46:2285–2290
Worhacz KM, Carter TR (2023) Meniscal allograft transplantation: does surgical technique influence clinical outcomes? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-023-09825-3
Zhang S, Li H, Li H, Hua Y (2021) Bone bridge fixation has superior biomechanics on posterior knees to bone plug fixation after lateral meniscal allograft transplantation—a biomechanical study simulating partial weight-bearing conditions. Knee 32:64–71
Zsidai B, Lucidi GA, Winkler PW, Gnandt RJ, Engler ID, Musahl V (2022) All-soft tissue meniscus allograft transplantation: indications, techniques, and results. VJSM 2:263502542211070
Abat F, Gelber PE, Erquicia JI, Tey M, Gonzalez-Lucena G, Monllau JC (2013) Prospective comparative study between two different fixation techniques in meniscal allograft transplantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1516–1522
Winkler PW, Wagala NN, Hughes JD, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Musahl V (2021) Association between meniscal allograft tears and early surgical meniscal allograft failure. Am J Sports Med 49:3302–3311
Zacchilli MA, Dai AZ, Strauss EJ, Jazrawi LM, Meislin RJ (2017) Bone Trough Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: The Tapered Teardrop Technique. Arthrosc Tech 6:e2301–e2312
Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49
Yoon J-R, Kim T-S, Wang J-H, Yun H-H, Lim H, Yang J-H (2011) Importance of independent measurement of width and length of lateral meniscus during preoperative sizing for meniscal allograft transplantation. Am J Sports Med 39:1541–1547
Spalding T, Damasena I, Lawton R (2020) Meniscal repair techniques. Clin Sports Med 39:37–56
Wright D, Parkinson B, Smith NA, Spalding T (2015) Rehabilitation following MAT. Meniscal allograft transplantation a comprehensive review. DJO Publications Surrey, UK, pp 349–60
Cavendish AP, Dibartola AC, Everhart JS, Kuzma S, Kim WJ, Flanigan DC (2020) Meniscal allograft transplantation: a review of indications, techniques, and outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:3539–3550
Getgood A, Gelber J, Gortz S, De Young A, Bugbee W (2015) Combined osteochondral allograft and meniscal allograft transplantation: a survivorship analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:946–953
Lee AS, Kang RW, Kroin E, Verma NN, Cole BJ (2012) Allograft meniscus transplantation. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 20:106–114
Lee B-S, Kim J-M, Sohn D-W, Bin S-I (2013) Review of meniscal allograft transplantation focusing on long-term results and evaluation methods. Knee Surg Relat Res 25:1–6
Song J-H, Bin S-I, Kim J-M, Lee B-S (2022) Meniscal allograft transplantation shows a mismatch between anatomic and clinical failures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30:1700–1705
Vundelinckx B, Vanlauwe J, Bellemans J (2014) Long-term subjective, clinical, and radiographic outcome evaluation of meniscal allograft transplantation in the knee. Am J Sports Med 42:1592–1599
van der Wal RJP, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Spek RWA, Thomassen BJW, van Arkel ERA, Nelissen RGHH (2020) Meniscal allograft transplantation in The Netherlands: long-term survival, patient-reported outcomes, and their association with preoperative complaints and interventions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:3551–3560
Fanelli D, Mercurio M, Gasparini G, Galasso O (2021) Predictors of meniscal allograft transplantation outcome: a systematic review. J Knee Surg 34:303–321
Ahn JH, Kang HW, Yang TY, Lee JY (2016) Risk factors for radiographic progression of osteoarthritis after meniscus allograft transplantation. Arthroscopy 32:2539–2546
Torres-Claramunt R, Morales-Avalos R, Perelli S, Padilla-Medina JR, Monllau JC (2023) Good clinical outcomes can be expected after meniscal allograft transplantation at 15 years of follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31:272–278
Wang D-Y, Zhang B, Li Y-Z, Meng X-Y, Jiang D, Yu J-K (2022) The Long-term chondroprotective effect of meniscal allograft transplant: a 10- to 14-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 50:128–137
McCormick F, Harris JD, Abrams GD, Hussey KE, Wilson H, Frank R, Gupta AK, Bach BR, Cole BJ (2014) Survival and reoperation rates after meniscal allograft transplantation: analysis of failures for 172 consecutive transplants at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 42:892–897
Grassi A, Macchiarola L, Lucidi GA, Coco V, Romandini I, Filardo G, Neri MP, Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S (2020) Long-term outcomes and survivorship of fresh-frozen meniscal allograft transplant with soft tissue fixation: minimum 10-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 48:2360–2369
Lee DW, Lee JH, Kim DH, Kim JG (2018) Delayed rehabilitation after lateral meniscal allograft transplantation can reduce graft extrusion compared with standard rehabilitation. Am J Sports Med 46:2432–2440
Vasta S, Zampogna B, Hartog TD, El Bitar Y, Uribe-Echevarria B, Amendola A (2022) Outcomes, complications, and reoperations after meniscal allograft transplantation. Orthop J Sports Med 10:23259671221075310
Bin S-I, Nha K-W, Cheong J-Y, Shin Y-S (2018) Midterm and long-term results of medial versus lateral meniscal allograft transplantation: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 46:1243–1250
Abat F, Gelber PE, Erquicia JI, Pelfort X, Gonzalez-Lucena G, Monllau JC (2012) Suture-only fixation technique leads to a higher degree of extrusion than bony fixation in meniscal allograft transplantation. Am J Sports Med 40:1591–1596
Masferrer-Pino A, Monllau JC, Ibáñez M, Erquicia JI, Pelfort X, Gelber PE (2018) Capsulodesis versus bone trough technique in lateral meniscal allograft transplantation: graft extrusion and functional results. Arthroscopy 34:1879–1888
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the UHCW Meniscal Transplant service
Funding
No additional funding was required.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RB—study design, data collection, analysis, writing, editing and approval of manuscript. HK—data collection, approval of manuscript. NB—data collection, approval of manuscript. NMG—data collection, approval of manuscript. AP—data analysis, approval of manuscript. PT—data analysis, approval of manuscript. AM—data analysis, approval of manuscript. TS—study design, data analysis, editing and approval of manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
One of the authors (TS) is a named consultant for CONMED (USA) for teaching and surgical techniques. No relation to any instruments used in this paper. Another author (AM) has non-commercial research funding and unrelated research support. All the other authors have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Approved by the Research and Development Department at University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhattacharyya, R., Krishnan, H., Bausch, N. et al. Bone bridge technique for lateral meniscal allograft transplantation: no difference in clinical outcome compared to the soft tissue technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 4162–4170 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07443-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07443-7