Skip to main content
Log in

Quadriceps tendon autograft is comparable to hamstring tendon and bone-patella-tendon-bone up to 2 years after isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the functional and graft survivorship outcomes of the three most common autograft options for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR)—hamstring tendon (HT), bone-patella-tendon-bone (BPTB), and quadriceps tendon (QT).

Methods

Patients captured by the New Zealand ACL registry who underwent a primary ACLR from 2014 to 2020 were considered for the study. Patients with associated knee injury (including meniscus, chondral, osseous, and additional ligamentous injury) and previous knee surgery were excluded. Comparison was made between HT, BPTB, and QT autografts with respect to Marx and KOOS (Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) scores at minimum 2 years follow-up. In addition, graft survivorship was evaluated by comparing all-cause revision per 100 graft years and revision-free proportion at 2 years post-surgery.

Results

2,582 patients (1,921 HT, 558 BPTB, 107 QT) were included in the study. Differences in adjusted functional outcomes between HT and BPTB were found at 12 months (mean Marx; HT 6.2; BPTB 7.1; P < 0.001) (mean KOOS Sport and Recreation; HT 75.1; BPTB 70.5; n.s.) and 24 months (mean KOOS Sports and Recreation; HT 79.2; BPTB 73.9; P < 0.001). QT was comparable to HT and BPTB in all functional scores at 12 months and 2 years. No statistically significant differences were found in revision rate between all three autograft groups up to 2 years post-surgery (revision rate per 100 graft years; HT 1.05; BPTB 0.80; QT 1.68; n.s. HT vs. BPTB; n.s. HT vs. QT; n.s. QT vs. BPTB).

Conclusions

QT was found to be comparable to both HT and BPTB in all functional scores and revision rates up to 2 years post-surgery.

Level of evidence

Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the New Zealand ACL Registry but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the New Zealand ACL Registry.

References

  1. Ajrawat P, Dwyer T, Whelan D, Theodoropoulos J, Murnaghan L, Bhargava M, Ogilvie-Harris D, Chahal J (2021) A comparison of quadriceps tendon autograft with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and hamstring tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis. Clin J Sport Med 31:392–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold MP, Calcei JG, Vogel N, Magnussen RA, Clatworthy M, Spalding T, Campbell JD, Bergfeld JA, Sherman SL, ACL Study Group (2021) ACL study group survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29:3871–3876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aslam MA, Avasthi S, Aggarwal P, Singh S, Kumar V, Mahapatra S (2021) Clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft: a retrospective analysis. Cureus 13:e18760

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Beletsky A, Naami E, Lu Y, Polce EM, Chahla J, Okoroha KR, Bush-Joseph C, Bach B, Yanke A, Forsythe B, Cole BJ, Verma NN (2021) The minimally clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a time-to-achievement analysis. Orthopedics 44:299–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Belk JW, Kraeutler MJ, Marshall HA, Goodrich JA, McCarty EC (2018) Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of comparative studies with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 34:1699–1707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavaignac E, Coulin B, Tscholl P, Nik Mohd Fatmy N, Duthon V, Menetrey J (2017) Is Quadriceps tendon autograft a better choice than hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? a comparative study with a mean follow-up of 3.6 years. Am J Sports Med 45:1326–1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dai W, Leng X, Wang J, Cheng J, Hu X, Ao Y (2022) Quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 50:3425–3439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Diermeier T, Tisherman R, Hughes J, Tulman M, Baum Coffey E, Fink C, Lynch A, Fu FH, Musahl V (2020) Quadriceps tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:2644–2656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer F, Fink C, Herbst E, Hoser C, Hepperger C, Blank C, Gföller P (2018) Higher hamstring-to-quadriceps isokinetic strength ratio during the first post-operative months in patients with quadriceps tendon compared to hamstring tendon graft following ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:418–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harput G, Guney-Deniz H, Ozer H, Baltaci G, Mattacola C (2018) Higher body mass index adversely affects knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in individuals who are recreationally active. Clin J Sport Med Publish Ahead of Print: e194–e200

  11. Hunnicutt JL, Gregory CM, McLeod MM, Woolf SK, Chapin RW, Slone HS (2019) Quadriceps recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon versus patellar tendon autografts. Orthop J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119839786

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin L, Wang H-J, Wang Y-J, Wang J, Chen Y-R, Yu J-K (2023) Comparison of the clinical outcomes of revision and primary ACL reconstruction: a matched-pair analysis with 3–5 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221148746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lind M, Nielsen TG, Soerensen OG, Mygind-Klavsen B, Faunø P (2020) Quadriceps tendon grafts does not cause patients to have inferior subjective outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction than do hamstring grafts: a 2-year prospective randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med 54:183–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lind M, Strauss MJ, Nielsen T, Engebretsen L (2021) Low surgical routine increases revision rates after quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish knee ligament reconstruction registry. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29:1880–1886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lind M, Strauss MJ, Nielsen T, Engebretsen L (2020) Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with high revision rates: results from the Danish knee ligament registry. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:2163–2169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lund B, Nielsen T, Faunø P, Christiansen SE, Lind M (2014) Is quadriceps tendon a better graft choice than patellar tendon? a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy 30:593–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marshall JL, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Reider B (1979) The anterior cruciate ligament: a technique of repair and reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 97–106

  18. Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (2001) Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med 29:213–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM (2001) The western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum 45:453–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mouarbes D, Dagneaux L, Olivier M, Lavoue V, Peque E, Berard E, Cavaignac E (2020) Lower donor-site morbidity using QT autografts for ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:2558–2566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mouarbes D, Menetrey J, Marot V, Courtot L, Berard E, Cavaignac E (2019) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring-tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 47:3531–3540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nielsen TG, Sørensen OG, Lind M (2022) A comparison of multi-ligament reconstruction and isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at one year follow-up: results from the Danish knee ligament reconstruction registry. J Exp Orthop 9:30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nwachukwu BU, Sullivan SW, Rauck RC, James EW, Burger JA, Altchek DW, Allen AA, Williams RJ, The HSS ACL Registry Group (2021) Patient-reported outcomes and factors associated with achieving the minimal clinically important difference after ACL reconstruction. JB JS Open Access. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.oa.21.00056

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rahardja R, Zhu M, Love H, Clatworthy MG, Monk AP, Young SW (2020) Effect of graft choice on revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the New Zealand ACL Registry. Am J Sports Med 48:63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rizvanovic D, Waldén M, Forssblad M, Stålman A (2022) Surgeon’s experience, sports participation and a concomitant MCL injury increase the use of patellar and quadriceps tendon grafts in primary ACL reconstruction: a nationwide registry study of 39,964 surgeries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31:475–486

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Runer A, Csapo R, Hepperger C, Herbort M, Hoser C, Fink C (2020) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with quadriceps tendon autograft result in lower graft rupture rates but similar patient-reported outcomes as compared with hamstring tendon autograft: a comparison of 875 patients. Am J Sports Med 48:2195–2204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Runer A, Suter A, Roberti di Sarsina T, Jucho L, Gföller P, Csapo R, Hoser C, Fink C, (2022) Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction show comparable clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcome measures, but lower donor-site morbidity compared with hamstring tendon autograft: A matched-pairs study with a mean follow-up of 6.5 years. J Isakos https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2022.08.008

  29. Runer A, Wierer G, Herbst E, Hepperger C, Herbort M, Gfoller P, Hoser C, Fink C (2018) There is no difference between quadriceps- and hamstring tendon autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2-year patient-reported outcome study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:605–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Saithna A, Daggett M, Helito CP, Monaco E, Franck F, Vieira TD, Pioger C, Kim JG, Sonnery-Cottet B (2021) Clinical results of combined ACL and anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a narrative review from the SANTI study group. J Knee Surg 34:962–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sarraj M, Coughlin RP, Solow M, Ekhtiari S, Simunovic N, Krych AJ, MacDonald P, Ayeni OR (2019) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with concomitant meniscal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:3441–3452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Setliff JC, Nazzal EM, Drain NP, Herman ZJ, Mirvish AB, Smith C, Lesniak BP, Musahl V, Hughes JD (2022) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon versus quadriceps tendon with bone block. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07254-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shani RH, Umpierez E, Nasert M, Hiza EA, Xerogeanes J (2016) Biomechanical comparison of quadriceps and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 32:71–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shankar DS, Vasavada KD, Avila A, DeClouette B, Aziz H, Strauss EJ, Alaia MJ, Jazrawi LM, Gonzalez-Lomas G, Campbell KA (2023) Acceptable clinical outcomes despite high reoperation rate at minimum 12-month follow-up after concomitant arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and medial meniscal allograft transplantation. Knee Surg Relat Res 35:2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Sheean AJ, Musahl V, Slone HS, Xerogeanes JW, Milinkovic D, Fink C, Hoser C (2018) Quadriceps tendon autograft for arthroscopic knee ligament reconstruction: use it now, use it often. Br J Sports Med 52:698–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sutherland K, Clatworthy M, Chang K, Rahardja R, Young SW (2019) Risk factors for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and frequency with which patients change surgeons. Orthop J Sports Med 7 (11)

  37. Svantesson E, Hamrin Senorski E, Alentorn-Geli E, Westin O, Sundemo D, Grassi A, Čustović S, Samuelsson K (2019) Increased risk of ACL revision with non-surgical treatment of a concomitant medial collateral ligament injury: a study on 19,457 patients from the Swedish national knee ligament registry. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2450–2459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Svantesson E, Hamrin Senorski E, Webster KE, Karlsson J, Diermeier T, Rothrauff BB, Meredith SJ, Rauer T, Irrgang JJ, Spindler KP, Ma CB, Musahl V (2020) Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group. J ISAKOS 5:281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tan TK, Subramaniam AG, Ebert JR, Radic R (2021) Quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 50:3974–3986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Thaunat M, Fayard JM, Sonnery-Cottet B (2019) Hamstring tendons or bone-patellar tendon-bone graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105:S89–S94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Todor A, Nistor DV, Caterev S (2019) Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. a retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 53:180–183

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Urchek R, Karas S (2019) Biomechanical comparison of quadriceps and 6-strand hamstring tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 7 (10)

  43. Vermeijden HD, Yang XA, Rademakers MV, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, van der List JP, DiFelice GS (2022) Early and delayed surgery for isolated ACL and multiligamentous knee injuries have equivalent results: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211069356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Xerogeanes JW (2019) Quadriceps tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the graft of the future! Arthroscopy 35:696–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. (2020) New Zealand ACL Registry Annual Report 2020.

Download references

Funding

Northland Orthopaedic Charitable Research Trust

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yushy Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no confilct of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved to be performed by the New Zealand ACL Registry on 4 February 2021. Ethics approval was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 12 KB)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 11 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Fuimaono-Asafo, A., Frampton, C. et al. Quadriceps tendon autograft is comparable to hamstring tendon and bone-patella-tendon-bone up to 2 years after isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 3268–3276 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07370-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07370-7

Keywords

Navigation