Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A practical guide to the development and deployment of deep learning models for the orthopedic surgeon: part II

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Deep learning has the potential to be one of the most transformative technologies to impact orthopedic surgery. Substantial innovation in this area has occurred over the past 5 years, but clinically meaningful advancements remain limited by a disconnect between clinical and technical experts. That is, it is likely that few orthopedic surgeons possess both the clinical knowledge necessary to identify orthopedic problems, and the technical knowledge needed to implement deep learning-based solutions. To maximize the utilization of rapidly advancing technologies derived from deep learning models, orthopedic surgeons should understand the steps needed to design, organize, implement, and evaluate a deep learning project and its workflow. Equipping surgeons with this knowledge is the objective of this three-part editorial review. Part I described the processes involved in defining the problem, team building, data acquisition, curation, labeling, and establishing the ground truth. Building on that, this review (Part II) provides guidance on pre-processing and augmenting the data, making use of open-source libraries/toolkits, and selecting the required hardware to implement the pipeline. Special considerations regarding model training and evaluation unique to deep learning models relative to “shallow” machine learning models are also reviewed. Finally, guidance pertaining to the clinical deployment of deep learning models in the real world is provided. As in Part I, the focus is on applications of deep learning for computer vision and imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Ahn G, Choi BS, Ko S, Jo C, Han HS, Lee MC et al (2022) High-resolution knee plain radiography image synthesis using style generative adversarial network adaptive discriminator augmentation. J Orthop Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anaconda. https://www.anaconda.com. Accessed 29 Oct 2022

  3. Bernstein D (2014) Containers and cloud: from LXC to docker to kubernetes. IEEE Cloud Computing 1:81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung SW, Han SS, Lee JW, Oh KS, Kim NR, Yoon JP et al (2018) Automated detection and classification of the proximal humerus fracture by using deep learning algorithm. Acta Orthop 89:468–473

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. fast.ai. https://docs.fast.ai. Accessed 29 Oct 2022

  6. Frid-Adar M, Diamant I, Klang E, Amitai M, Goldberger J, Greenspan H (2018) GAN-based synthetic medical image augmentation for increased CNN performance in liver lesion classification. Neurocomputing 321:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Galbusera F, Bassani T, Casaroli G, Gitto S, Zanchetta E, Costa F et al (2018) Generative models: an upcoming innovation in musculoskeletal radiology? A preliminary test in spine imaging. Eur Radiol Exp 2:29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. GitHub. https://github.com. Accessed 31 Oct 2022

  9. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hightower K, Burns B, Beda J (2017) Kubernetes: up and running dive into the future of infrastructure. O’Reilly Media, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horng MH, Kuok CP, Fu MJ, Lin CJ, Sun YN (2019) Cobb angle measurement of spine from x-ray images using convolutional neural network. Comput Math Methods Med 2019:6357171

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jupyter. https://jupyter.org. Accessed 29 Oct 2022

  13. Keras. https://keras.io. Accessed 29 Oct 2022

  14. Li YC, Chen HH, Horng-Shing LH, Hondar Wu HT, Chang MC, Chou PH (2021) Can a deep-learning model for the automated detection of vertebral fractures approach the performance level of human subspecialists? Clin Orthop Relat Res 479:1598–1612

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. NVIDIA cuDNN. https://developer.nvidia.com/cudnn. Accessed 30 Oct 2022

  16. Oeding JF, Williams RJ, Nwachukwu BU, Martin RK, Kelly BT, Karlsson J et al (2022) A practical guide to the development and deployment of deep learning models for the Orthopedic surgeon: part I. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07239-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pruneski JA, Williams RJ, Nwachukwu BU, Ramkumar PN, Kiapour AM, Martin RK et al (2022) The development and deployment of machine learning models. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07155-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Python. https://www.python.org. Accessed 29 Oct 2022

  19. PyTorch. https://pytorch.org. Accessed 29 Oct 2022

  20. Shin H-C, Tenenholtz NA, Rogers JK, Schwarz CG, Senjem ML, Gunter JL et al (2018) Medical image synthesis for data augmentation and anonymization using generative adversarial networks. In: Gooya A, Goksel O, Oguz I, Burgos N (eds) Simulation and synthesis in medical imaging. Springer International Publishing, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  21. TensorFlow. https://www.tensorflow.org. Accessed 29 Oct 2022

  22. Thambawita V, Strümke I, Hicks SA, Halvorsen P, Parasa S, Riegler MA (2021) Impact of image resolution on deep learning performance in endoscopy image classification: an experimental study using a large dataset of endoscopic images. Diagnostics (Basel) 11(12):2183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thian YL, Li Y, Jagmohan P, Sia D, Chan VEY, Tan RT (2019) Convolutional neural networks for automated fracture detection and localization on wrist radiographs. Radiol Artif Intell 1:e180001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolterink JM, Mukhopadhyay A, Leiner T, Vogl TJ, Bucher AM, Išgum I (2021) Generative adversarial networks: a primer for radiologists. Radiographics 41:840–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was needed for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayoosh Pareek.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oeding, J.F., Williams, R.J., Camp, C.L. et al. A practical guide to the development and deployment of deep learning models for the orthopedic surgeon: part II. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 1635–1643 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07338-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07338-7

Keywords

Navigation