Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patellofemoral arthroplasty: obesity linked to high risk of revision and progression of medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of obesity on patient outcome, procedure failure rate and osteoarthritis (OA) progression in the tibiofemoral compartments in a series of isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) performed with a third-generation implant.

Methods

The study population was patients who had undergone third-generation PFA at a specialized orthopedic center between 2007 and 2017. Patients were categorized by body-mass index (BMI) as obese (O, BMI > 30 kg/m2) or nonobese (NO, BMI < 30 kg/m2). Preoperative and postoperative clinical and functional assessment included knee range of motion, Knee Society Score (KSS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score, Tegner Activity Level Scale, and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were evaluated for progression of tibiofemoral compartment OA, changes in patellar height and in knee coronal alignment. Multiple logistic regression models were used to assess the effect of BMI on outcomes together with other covariates.

Results

A total of 120 PFAs with a mean follow-up of 6.9 ± 2.5 years were included: 25 in the O group and 95 in the NO group. Significant improvement was noted in in knee range of motion (P < 0.001), clinical and functional KSS (P < 0.001), UCLA Activity Score (P < 0.001), Tegner score (P < 0.001) and VAS pain (P < 0.001) without inter-groups differences. Worsening of the medial Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade (but not the lateral KL grade) was more frequent in the O than the NO group during the follow-up period (P = 0.014). Failure occurred in 4.2% of NO and in 20% of O group patients; the difference was solely due to failure because of OA progression in the tibiofemoral compartment (16% in the O group). There were no between group differences in the failure rate for any cause other than OA progression (4.2% in the NO group, 4.0% in the O group).

Conclusions

An equal improvement in function after PFA was noted in both obese and nonobese patients; however, the high failure rate due to OA progression in the medial tibiofemoral compartment warrants caution when considering PFA in obese patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PFA:

Patellofemoral arthroplasty

TKA:

Total knee arthroplasty

OA:

Osteoarthritis

ROM:

Range of motion

BMI:

Body mass index

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

KL:

Kellgren–Lawrence

KSS:

Knee Society score

UCLA:

University of California Los Angeles Activity Score

HKA:

Hip–knee–ankle angle

O:

Obese

NO:

Non obese

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Ackerman IN, Kemp JL, Crossley KM, Culvenor AG, Hinman RS (2017) Hip and knee osteoarthritis affects younger people, too. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 47:67–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bunyoz KI, Lustig S, Troelsen A (2019) Similar postoperative patient-reported outcome in both second generation patellofemoral arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(7):2226–2237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P, Lerat JL, Dejour H (1982) Patella infera. A propos of 128 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 68:317–325

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaudhry H, Ponnusamy K, Somerville L, McCalden RW, Marsh J, Vasarhelyi EM (2019) Revision rates and functional outcomes among severely, morbidly, and super-obese patients following primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBJS Rev 7:e9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dahm DL, Al-Rayashi W, Dajani K, Shah JP, Levy BA, Stuart MJ (2010) Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop 39:487–491

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dahm DL, Kalisvaart MM, Stuart MJ, Slettedahl SW (2014) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: outcomes and factors associated with early progression of tibiofemoral arthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2554–2559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dejour D, Reynaud P, Lecoultre B (1998) Douleurs et instabilite rotulienne, essai de classification. Med Hyg 56:1466–1471

    Google Scholar 

  8. Desai VS, Pareek A, DeDeugd CM, Sabbag OD, Krych AJ, Cummings NM, Dahm DL (2020) Smoking, unemployment, female sex, obesity, and medication use yield worse outcomes in patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:2962–2969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iwano T, Kurosawa H, Tokuyama H, Hoshikawa Y (1990) Roentgenographic and clinical findings of patellofemoral osteoarthrosis: with special reference to its relationship to femorotibial osteoarthrosis and etiologic factors. Clin Orthop 252:190–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Liow MH, Goh GS, Tay DK, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ (2016) Obesity and the absence of trochlear dysplasia increase the risk of revision in patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee 23(2):331–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Onggo JR, Onggo JD, de Steiger R, Hau R (2020) Greater risks of complications, infections, and revisions in the obese versus non-obese total hip arthroplasty population of 2,190,824 patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil 28(1):31–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Romagnoli S, Marullo M (2018) Mid-term clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes of 105 gender-specific patellofemoral arthroplasties, with or without the association of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33:688–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider BL, Ling DI, Kleebad LJ, Strickland S, Pearle A (2020) Comparing return to sports after patellofemoral and knee arthroplasty in an age- and sex- matched cohort. Orthop J Sports Med 5(8):2325967120957425

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1995) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tillman MD, Smith KR, Bauer JA, Cauraugh JH, Falsetti AB, Pattishall JL (2002) Differences in three intercondylar notch geometry indices between males and females: a cadaveric study. Knee 9:41–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tishelman JC, Pyne A, Kahlenberg CA, Gruskay JA, Strickland SM (2020) Obesity does not affect patient-reported outcomes following patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1713862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van der List JP, Chawla H, Villa JC, Pearle AD (2017) Why do patellofemoral arthroplasties fail today? A systematic review. Knee 24(1):2–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van der List JP, Chawla H, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD (2017) Survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(8):2622–2631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, Barnaart LF, van Kampen A (2010) Long-term outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:1066–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vandenneucker H, Labey L, Vander Sloten J, Desloovere K, Bellemans J (2016) Isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty reproduces natural patellofemoral joint kinematics when the patella is resurfaced. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3668–3677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Varadarajan KM, Gill TJ, Freiberg AA, Rubash HE, Li G (2009) Gender differences in trochlear groove orientation and rotational kinematics of human knees. J Orthop Res 27:871–878

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Vasso M, Corona K, Gomberg B, Marullo M, European Knee Associates Small Implants focus group (2021) Obesity increases the risk of conversion to total knee arthroplasty after unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06780-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP et al (2014) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 12:1495–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiberg G (1941) Roentgenographic and anatomic studies on the patellofemoral joint with special reference to chondromalacia patellae. Acta Orthop Scand 12:319–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC (1998) Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 13:890–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zheng H, Chen C (2015) Body mass index and risk of knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ Open 5(12):e007568

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MM was involved with study design, data collection, drafting, editing and reviewing of the manuscript; MB was involved with drafting and reviewing of the manuscript. CL was involved with data collection and drafting of the manuscript. MV was involved with statistical analysis, drafting, editing and reviewing of the manuscript. SR was involved with drafting and reviewing of the manuscript. All contributors met the ICMJE and journal criteria for authorship and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Marullo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Romagnoli is a paid consultant and receives royalties from Zimmer Biomet. The other authors reported no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (reference number: 134/INT/2017).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the participants who were included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marullo, M., Bargagliotti, M., Vigano’, M. et al. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: obesity linked to high risk of revision and progression of medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 4115–4122 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06947-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06947-y

Keywords

Navigation