Abstract
Purpose
To carry out the translation, cultural adaptation, and validation in the Brazilian Portuguese version of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-BR) in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
Methods
Patients with KOA (n = 136) answered KOOS-BR, Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) to access construct validity. KOOS-BR was answered again with an interval of five to eight days. The following were performed: Cronbach’s alpha to assess internal consistency, intraclass correction coefficient (ICC2,1) to assess reproducibility, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) as error measurements. Dimensionality was tested through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Responsiveness was investigated by the correlation between KOOS-BR subscales with global perceived effect (GPE) before and after physical therapy treatment for 6 weeks. Floor and ceiling effects (< 15%) were also assessed.
Results
KOOS-BR version showed good test–retest reliability in all KOOS-BR subscales (ICC = 0.77–0.84), with proper internal consistency (α = 0.71–0.94). KOOS-BR showed a moderate direct correlation with physical health domains of SF-36 (r = 0.39–0.68; p < 0.001) and a moderate inverse correlation with pain intensity (r = − 0.51 to − 0.57; p < 0.001). KOOS-BR proved to be responsive, the correlation between the KOOS-BR subscales and GPE before and after treatment ranged from 0.42 to 0.60 (p < 0.001). There was no ceiling and floor effect.
Conclusion
KOOS-BR is reliable, valid, and responsive in patients with KOA.
Level of evidence
II.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alfadhel SA, Vennu V, Alnahdi AH, Omar MT, Alasmari SH, AlJafri Z, Bindawas SM (2018) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Saudi Arabic version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Rheumatol Int 38:1547–1555
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186–3191
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840
Cheng ASK, Chan KC, Chan SY, Fan MK, Fung MK, Lee OY, Kwok CTT, Wong JKK (2019) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hong Kong version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HK-KOOS) for patients with knee osteoarthritis. Occup Ther Int 2019:8270637
Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinão I, Quaresma MR (1999) Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol 39:143–150
Collins NJ, Prinsen CAC, Christensen R, Bartels EM, Terwee CB, Roos EM (2016) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthr Cartil 24:1317–1329
Fermanian J (1984) Measuring agreement between 2 observers: a quantitative case. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 32:408–413
Gonçalves RS, Cabri J, Pinheiro JP, Ferreira PL (2009) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Osteoarthr Cartil 17:1156–1162
Gonçalves RS, Cabri J, Pinheiro JP, Ferreira PL, Gil J (2010) Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Portuguese version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score—Physical Function Short-form (KOOS-PS). Osteoarthr Cartil 18:372–376
Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417–1432
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, Welch, V (2019) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK, 703 p
Hu L, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 3:424–453
Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S (1986) The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain 27:117–126
Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND (2016) Classifications in brief: Kellgren-Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:1886–1893
Lizaur-Utilla A, Miralles-Muñoz FA, Gonzalez-Parreño S, Lopez-Prats FA (2019) Validation of the Spanish version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for elderly patients with total knee replacement. J Orthop Res 37:2157–2162
Matsunaga M (2010) How to factor-analyze your data right: do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. Int J Psychol Res 3:97–110
de Medeiros FC, Costa LOP, de Oliveira N, Costa LCM (2016) Satisfação de pacientes que recebem cuidados fisioterapêuticos para condições musculoesqueléticas: um estudo transversal. Fisioter e Pesqui 23:105–110
Monticone M, Ferrante S, Salvaderi S, Rocca B, Totti V, Foti C, Roi GS (2012) Development of the Italian version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for patients with knee injuries: cross-cultural adaptation, dimensionality, reliability, and validity. Osteoarthr Cartil 20:330–335
Moore MT, Brown TA (2012) Confirmatory factor analysis. In: Hoyle R (ed) Handbook of structural equation modeling modeling. Guilford Press, New York, pp 361–379
Ornetti P, Parratte S, Gossec L, Tavernier C, Argenson JN, Roos EM, Guillemin F, Maillefert JF (2008) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in knee osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthr Cartil 16:423–428
Ostelo RWJG, De Vet HCW, Knol DL, Van Den Brandt PA (2004) 24-Item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 57:268–276
Peccin MS, Ciconelli R, Cohen M (2006) Questionário específico para sintomas do joelho “lysholm knee scoring scale” - Tradução e validação para a língua Portuguesa. Acta Ortop Bras 14:268–272
Roos EM, Lohmander LS (2003) The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:64
Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS (2007) Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:439–448
Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander L, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96
Rossi MJ, Lubowitz JH, Guttmann D (2002) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613
Terwee CB, Bot SDMD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCCW (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42
Zhang QH, Du SX, Zheng GZ, Chang B, Xie D, Lin FX, Xie P, Yu GY, Hu QX, Liu DZ, Li XD (2019) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Mainland China. Z Orthop Unfall 157:42–47
Funding
This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study. The material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by RMOC and GPLA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by RMOC and MLAT. Supervision and written review of the study were carried out by GPLA, TRA and APM. All authors commented on the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest involved in writing this article.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo with protocol number 199.254.
Informed consent
Patients provided informed consent to take part in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Almeida, G.P.L., da Costa, R.M.O., Albano, T.R. et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validation and responsiveness in the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-BR). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 3343–3349 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06911-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06911-w