Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validation and responsiveness in the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-BR)

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To carry out the translation, cultural adaptation, and validation in the Brazilian Portuguese version of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-BR) in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods

Patients with KOA (n = 136) answered KOOS-BR, Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) to access construct validity. KOOS-BR was answered again with an interval of five to eight days. The following were performed: Cronbach’s alpha to assess internal consistency, intraclass correction coefficient (ICC2,1) to assess reproducibility, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) as error measurements. Dimensionality was tested through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Responsiveness was investigated by the correlation between KOOS-BR subscales with global perceived effect (GPE) before and after physical therapy treatment for 6 weeks. Floor and ceiling effects (< 15%) were also assessed.

Results

KOOS-BR version showed good test–retest reliability in all KOOS-BR subscales (ICC = 0.77–0.84), with proper internal consistency (α = 0.71–0.94). KOOS-BR showed a moderate direct correlation with physical health domains of SF-36 (r = 0.39–0.68; p < 0.001) and a moderate inverse correlation with pain intensity (r = − 0.51 to − 0.57; p < 0.001). KOOS-BR proved to be responsive, the correlation between the KOOS-BR subscales and GPE before and after treatment ranged from 0.42 to 0.60 (p < 0.001). There was no ceiling and floor effect.

Conclusion

KOOS-BR is reliable, valid, and responsive in patients with KOA.

Level of evidence

II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alfadhel SA, Vennu V, Alnahdi AH, Omar MT, Alasmari SH, AlJafri Z, Bindawas SM (2018) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Saudi Arabic version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Rheumatol Int 38:1547–1555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186–3191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng ASK, Chan KC, Chan SY, Fan MK, Fung MK, Lee OY, Kwok CTT, Wong JKK (2019) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hong Kong version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HK-KOOS) for patients with knee osteoarthritis. Occup Ther Int 2019:8270637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinão I, Quaresma MR (1999) Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol 39:143–150

    Google Scholar 

  6. Collins NJ, Prinsen CAC, Christensen R, Bartels EM, Terwee CB, Roos EM (2016) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthr Cartil 24:1317–1329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fermanian J (1984) Measuring agreement between 2 observers: a quantitative case. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 32:408–413

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gonçalves RS, Cabri J, Pinheiro JP, Ferreira PL (2009) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Osteoarthr Cartil 17:1156–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gonçalves RS, Cabri J, Pinheiro JP, Ferreira PL, Gil J (2010) Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Portuguese version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score—Physical Function Short-form (KOOS-PS). Osteoarthr Cartil 18:372–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417–1432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, Welch, V (2019) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK, 703 p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu L, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 3:424–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S (1986) The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain 27:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND (2016) Classifications in brief: Kellgren-Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:1886–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lizaur-Utilla A, Miralles-Muñoz FA, Gonzalez-Parreño S, Lopez-Prats FA (2019) Validation of the Spanish version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for elderly patients with total knee replacement. J Orthop Res 37:2157–2162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsunaga M (2010) How to factor-analyze your data right: do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. Int J Psychol Res 3:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. de Medeiros FC, Costa LOP, de Oliveira N, Costa LCM (2016) Satisfação de pacientes que recebem cuidados fisioterapêuticos para condições musculoesqueléticas: um estudo transversal. Fisioter e Pesqui 23:105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Monticone M, Ferrante S, Salvaderi S, Rocca B, Totti V, Foti C, Roi GS (2012) Development of the Italian version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for patients with knee injuries: cross-cultural adaptation, dimensionality, reliability, and validity. Osteoarthr Cartil 20:330–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moore MT, Brown TA (2012) Confirmatory factor analysis. In: Hoyle R (ed) Handbook of structural equation modeling modeling. Guilford Press, New York, pp 361–379

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ornetti P, Parratte S, Gossec L, Tavernier C, Argenson JN, Roos EM, Guillemin F, Maillefert JF (2008) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in knee osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthr Cartil 16:423–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ostelo RWJG, De Vet HCW, Knol DL, Van Den Brandt PA (2004) 24-Item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 57:268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peccin MS, Ciconelli R, Cohen M (2006) Questionário específico para sintomas do joelho “lysholm knee scoring scale” - Tradução e validação para a língua Portuguesa. Acta Ortop Bras 14:268–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Roos EM, Lohmander LS (2003) The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS (2007) Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:439–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander L, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rossi MJ, Lubowitz JH, Guttmann D (2002) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613

    Google Scholar 

  27. Terwee CB, Bot SDMD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCCW (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang QH, Du SX, Zheng GZ, Chang B, Xie D, Lin FX, Xie P, Yu GY, Hu QX, Liu DZ, Li XD (2019) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Mainland China. Z Orthop Unfall 157:42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study. The material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by RMOC and GPLA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by RMOC and MLAT. Supervision and written review of the study were carried out by GPLA, TRA and APM. All authors commented on the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest involved in writing this article.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo with protocol number 199.254.

Informed consent

Patients provided informed consent to take part in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almeida, G.P.L., da Costa, R.M.O., Albano, T.R. et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validation and responsiveness in the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-BR). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 3343–3349 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06911-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06911-w

Keywords

Navigation