Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Arthroscopic single anchor repair techniques for upper third subscapularis tears provide sufficient biomechanical stability

  • SHOULDER
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Upper third tears of the subscapularis tendon can be repaired successfully with a single anchor according to previous literature. The aim of the present study was to compare three single anchor repair techniques regarding fixation strength, footprint coverage and contact pressure in a biomechanical test set-up on human cadaveric shoulders.

Methods

Eighteen human cadaveric shoulders were randomized in three groups with respect to the repair technique; group 1: knotted lasso-loop mattress, group 2: knotted mattress and group 3: knotless tape repair. Upper third tears of the subscapularis tendon (Lafosse type 2) were created and repairs were performed with additional contact pressure and area measurement using a pressure mapping system. Cyclic testing was performed by loading the subscapularis from 10 to 100 N for 300 cycles. A position-controlled ramp protocol up to 30 and 50 N was used to allow for pressure measurements. Finally, specimens were loaded to failure and failure modes were recorded.

Results

The three groups were not significantly different regarding age, gender, bone mineral density at the lesser tuberosity, subscapularis footprint size and defect area created at the upper subscapularis insertion. A significant difference was detected between group 1 (48.6 ± 13.8%) and group 2 (25.9 ± 5.7%) regarding pressurized footprint coverage (p = 0.028).

Ultimate load to failure was 630.8 ± 145.3 N in group 1, 586.9 ± 220.7 N in group 2 and 678.2 ± 236.5 N in group 3, respectively. Cyclic displacement was similar in all three groups with an average displacement of 1.2 ± 0.6 mm. The highest stiffness was found in group 1 with 88 ± 30.3, which was not statistically significantly different to group 2 (65 ± 27 N/mm) and group 3 (83.9 ± 32.9 N/mm).

The most common mode of failure was suture cut-through at the suture–tendon interface (44%). Failures in group 3 were less common associated with suture cut-through (33% vs. 50% in group 1 and 2), but no significant differences were found.

Conclusions

All three tested single anchor repair techniques of upper third subscapularis tears were able to provide sufficient biomechanical stability. Knotted lasso-loop mattress and knotless tape repair were superior regarding pressurized footprint coverage compared to a knotted horizontal mattress technique and are, therefore, preferable techniques for upper subscapularis repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bisson LJ, Manohar LM, Wilkins RD, Gurske-Deperio J, Ehrensberger MT (2008) Influence of suture material on the biomechanical behavior of suture-tendon specimens: a controlled study in bovine rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med 36:907–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borbas P, Fischer L, Ernstbrunner L, Hoch A, Bachmann E, Bouaicha S et al (2021) High-strength suture tapes are biomechanically stronger than high-strength sutures used in rotator cuff repair. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 3:e873–e880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burkhart SS, Tehrany AM (2002) Arthroscopic subscapularis tendon repair: technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy 18:454–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cole BJ, ElAttrache NS, Anbari A (2007) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations. Arthroscopy 23:662–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cummins CA, Murrell GA (2003) Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:128–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Denard PJ, Burkhart SS (2013) Arthroscopic recognition and repair of the torn subscapularis tendon. Arthrosc Tech 2:e373-379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dyrna F, Beitzel K, Pauzenberger L, Dwyer CR, Obopilwe E, Mazzocca AD et al (2019) A superolaterally placed anchor for subscapularis “leading-edge” refixation: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 35:1306–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ek ET, Perret MC, Borbas P (2020) Arthroscopic knotless repair of complete full-thickness tears of the subscapularis tendon through a single portal. Arthrosc Tech 9:e439–e443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox JA, Noerdlinger M, Sasso LM, Romeo AA (2004) Arthroscopic subscapularis repair. In: Textbook of arthroscopy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 241257

  10. Gerber C, Krushell RJ (1991) Isolated rupture of the tendon of the subscapularis muscle. Clinical features in 16 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:389–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hapa O, Barber FA, Sunbuloglu E, Kocabey Y, Sarkalkan N, Baysal G (2011) Tendon-grasping strength of various suture configurations for rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1749–1754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hasler A, Boyce G, Schallberger A, Jost B, Catanzaro S, Gerber C (2019) Arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears: clinical outcome and structural integrity with a minimum follow-up of 4.6 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28:2171–2180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Katthagen JC, Vap AR, Tahal DS, Horan MP, Millett PJ (2017) Arthroscopic repair of isolated partial- and full-thickness upper third subscapularis tendon tears: minimum 2-year outcomes after single-anchor repair and biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 33:1286–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keating JF, Waterworth P, Shaw-Dunn J, Crossan J (1993) The relative strengths of the rotator cuff muscles. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:137–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim SH, Oh I, Park JS, Shin SK, Jeong WK (2005) Intra-articular repair of an isolated partial articular-surface tear of the subscapularis tendon. Am J Sports Med 33:1825–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lafosse L, Jost B, Reiland Y, Audebert S, Toussaint B, Gobezie R (2007) Structural integrity and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1184–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lafosse L, Van Raebroeckx A, Brzoska R (2006) A new technique to improve tissue grip: “the lasso-loop stitch.” Arthroscopy 22(1246):e1241-1243

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee S, Mahar A, Bynum K, Pedowitz R (2005) Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable sutureless screw anchor versus suture anchor fixation for rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 21:43–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liodakis E, Dratzidis A, Kraemer M, Hurschler C, Krettek C, Hawi A et al (2016) The lasso-loop, lasso-mattress and simple-cinch stitch for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: are there biomechanical differences? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:1581–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lorbach O, Trennheuser C, Kieb M, Efe T, Kohn D, Anagnostakos K (2016) Reconstruction of 25 and 50% subscapularis tears: a single anchor with a double-mattress suture is sufficient for the reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3855–3862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mazzocca AD, Bollier MJ, Ciminiello AM, Obopilwe E, DeAngelis JP, Burkhart SS et al (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs over time. Arthroscopy 26:592–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Park MC, Pirolo JM, Park CJ, Tibone JE, McGarry MH, Lee TQ (2009) The effect of abduction and rotation on footprint contact for single-row, double-row, and modified double-row rotator cuff repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 37:1599–1608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ponce BA, Hosemann CD, Raghava P, Tate JP, Eberhardt AW, Lafosse L (2011) Biomechanical evaluation of 3 arthroscopic self-cinching stitches for shoulder arthroscopy: the lasso-loop, lasso-mattress, and double-cinch stitches. Am J Sports Med 39:188–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sgroi M, Kappe T, Ludwig M, Fuchs M, Dornacher D, Reichel H et al (2021) Are knotted or knotless techniques better for reconstruction of full-thickness tears of the superior portion of the subscapularis tendon? A study in cadaver. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Simmer Filho J, Voss A, Pauzenberger L, Dwyer CR, Obopilwe E, Cote MP et al (2019) Footprint coverage comparison between knotted and knotless techniques in a single-row rotator cuff repair: biomechanical analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20:123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Turkel SJ, Panio MW, Marshall JL, Girgis FG (1981) Stabilizing mechanisms preventing anterior dislocation of the glenohumeral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:1208–1217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Urch E, Lin CC, Itami Y, Patel NA, McGarry MH, Limpisvasti O et al (2020) Improved rotator cuff footprint contact characteristics with an augmented repair construct using lateral edge fixation. Am J Sports Med 48:444–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland

    Paul Borbas, Sara Cammarata, Rafael Loucas, Florian B. Imhoff, Lukas Ernstbrunner & Karl Wieser

  2. Institute of Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Simon Hofstede

Authors
  1. Paul Borbas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sara Cammarata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rafael Loucas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Simon Hofstede
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Florian B. Imhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lukas Ernstbrunner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Karl Wieser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Borbas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval has been obtained by the cantonal ethics committee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borbas, P., Cammarata, S., Loucas, R. et al. Arthroscopic single anchor repair techniques for upper third subscapularis tears provide sufficient biomechanical stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 2105–2112 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06808-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06808-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation