Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High rates of outliers in computer-assisted high tibial osteotomy with excellent mid-term outcomes

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

A Correction to this article was published on 03 February 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

The primary aim was to evaluate the accuracy of navigation in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The secondary aim was to examine mid-term outcomes after HTO.

Methods

Inclusion criteria were patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis who underwent computer-assisted HTOs. Mechanical axis (MA), percentage MA (%MA), and change in posterior tibial slope (ΔPTS) were displayed on the navigation screen. Radiographic examinations included hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and PTS. Preoperative and 5 weeks postoperative standing radiographs of the whole lower extremity and knee were used. Clinical evaluations were performed using American Knee Society knee score and function score both preoperatively and at last follow-up. Radiographic evaluations were performed by orthopedic surgeons. Intraoperative navigation after osteotomy and postoperative standing radiograph were compared. MA (HKA), %MA, and ΔPTS were compared. Outliers were defined as > 3° in MA, > 10% in %MA, and > 10° in ΔPTS. Outlier and non-outlier groups were compared. The rate of conversion to arthroplasty was examined.

Results

This study involved 38 patients (44 knees) and last follow-up was at a mean of 5 years (range, 1–9 years). Mean American Knee Society knee score and function score improved significantly from 59 to 69 preoperatively to 95 and 85 at last follow-up, respectively. Absolute values of mean errors for MA, %MA, and ΔPTS were 2.1°, 9.3%, 1.2°, respectively. Outlier rates were 18% in MA, 39% in %MA, and 5% in ΔPTS. No significant factors were found in MA and ΔPTS. In %MA, preoperative JLCA was significantly higher in the outlier group compared to the non-outlier group. No knees underwent conversion to total knee arthroplasty. No differences in outcomes were found between outlier and non-outlier groups.

Conclusion

Although rates of outlier values in computer-assisted opening wedge HTO were high, mid-term outcomes were excellent.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data related to this case report are contained within the manuscript.

Change history

References

  1. Lee DK, Wang JH, Won Y, Min YK, Jaiswal S, Lee BH, Kim JY (2020) Preoperative latent medial laxity and correction angle are crucial factors for overcorrection in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(5):1411–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sprenger TR, Doerzbacher JF (2003) Tibial osteotomy for the treatment of varus gonarthrosis. Survival and failure analysis to twenty-two years. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85(3):469–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nha KW, Shin YS, Kwon HM, Sim JA, Na YG (2019) Navigated versus conventional technique in high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis focusing on weight bearing effect. Knee Surg Relat Res 31(2):81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yan J, Musahl V, Kay J, Khan M, Simunovic N, Ayeni OR (2016) Outcome reporting following navigated high tibial osteotomy of the knee: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(11):3529–3555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kyung BS, Kim JG, Jang KM, Chang M, Moon YW, Ahn JH, Wang JH (2013) Are navigation systems accurate enough to predict the correction angle during high tibial osteotomy? Comparison of navigation systems with 3-dimensional computed tomography and standing radiographs. Am J Sports Med 41(10):2368–2374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim HJ, Yoon JR, Choi GW, Yang JH (2016) Imageless navigation versus conventional open wedge high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Knee Surg Relat Res 28(1):16–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee DH, Nha KW, Park SJ, Han SB (2012) Preoperative and postoperative comparisons of navigation and radiologic limb alignment measurements after high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 28(12):1842–1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:485–493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Takagawa S, Kobayashi N, Yukizawa Y, Oishi T, Tsuji M, Inaba Y (2020) Preoperative soft tissue laxity around knee was associated with less accurate alignment correction after hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(9):3022–3030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee DH, Park SC, Park HJ, Han SB (2016) Effect of soft tissue laxity of the knee joint on limb alignment correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(12):3704–3712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsuji M, Akamatsu Y, Kobayashi H, Mitsugi N, Inaba Y, Saito T (2020) Joint line convergence angle predicts outliers of coronal alignment in navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140(6):707–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bae DK, Song SJ, Kim KI, Hur D, Jeong HY (2016) Mid-term survival analysis of closed wedge high tibial osteotomy: a comparative study of computer-assisted and conventional techniques. Knee 23(2):283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu ZP, Zhang P, Bai JZ, Liang Y, Chen PT, He JS, Wang JC (2018) Comparison of navigated and conventional high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthritic knees with varus deformity: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 55:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schröter S, Ihle C, Elson DW, Döbele S, Stöckle U, Ateschrang A (2016) Surgical accuracy in high tibial osteotomy: coronal equivalence of computer navigation and gap measurement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(11):3410–3417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bito H, Takeuchi R, Kumagai K, Aratake M, Saito I, Hayashi R, Sasaki Y, Saito T (2010) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy affects both the lateral patellar tilt and patellar height. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(7):955–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Greimel F, Maderbacher G, Baier C, Krieg B, Zeman F, Grifka J, Keshmiri A (2020) Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) does not relevantly alter patellar kinematics: a cadaveric study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03578-1. Epub ahead of print.

  19. Song IH, Song EK, Seo HY, Lee KB, Yim JH, Seon JK (2012) Patellofemoral alignment and anterior knee pain after closing- and opening-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 28(8):1087–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng T, Zhao S, Peng X, Zhang X (2012) Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(7):1307–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hasegawa M, Yoshida K, Wakabayashi H, Sudo A (2011) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: comparison of jig-based technique versus computer navigation for clinical and alignment outcome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(6):904–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Han SB, Lee DH (2016) Correlations between navigation and radiographic measures of alignment. J Knee Surg 29(8):658–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kendoff D, Board TN, Citak M, Gardner MJ, Hankemeier S, Ostermeier S, Krettek C, Hüfner T (2008) Navigated lower limb axis measurements: Influence of mechanical weight-bearing simulation. J Orthop Res 26(4):553–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MH was the main investigator and wrote the manuscript. YN and ST helped with data analysis. AS helped with the interpretation of the data and results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Hasegawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for the present study was obtained from the institutional review board of Mie University (Study no. H2021-111).

Informed consent

We applied Opt-out method to obtain consent on this study using homepage of our institution.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: Duplicated text in Article Copyright Holdername corrected.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hasegawa, M., Naito, Y., Tone, S. et al. High rates of outliers in computer-assisted high tibial osteotomy with excellent mid-term outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 399–405 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06788-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06788-1

Keywords

Navigation