Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair results in similar postoperative functional outcomes in patients with only rotator cuff tears and those with concomitant cervical radiculopathy

  • SHOULDER
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare postoperative functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients with only rotator cuff tears versus those with concomitant cervical radiculopathy.

Methods

A retrospective study of patients who underwent unilateral rotator cuff repair at a tertiary hospital between 2012 and 2016 was conducted. Patients included in the study were divided into two groups: (1) those with rotator cuff tears only (RC only) and (2) those with concomitant cervical radiculopathy (RC + radiculopathy). Cervical radiculopathy was treated non-surgically in these patients. Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLASS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score were measured for each patient preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

Results

As compared to the RC-only group (n = 324), the RC + radiculopathy group (n = 33) had significantly poorer OSS (p = 0.001), CSS (p = 0.017) and UCLASS (p = 0.009) functional scores preoperatively. On follow-up, there were no significant differences in functional outcomes between the groups at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively for OSS, CSS, UCLASS and VAS pain scores, with the exception of CSS which was higher in the RC-only group at 6 months (p = 0.007). The absolute change and number of patients that attained minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for OSS, CSS and UCLASS at 12- and 24-month follow-ups were also comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

Patients with rotator cuff tears and concomitant cervical radiculopathy achieve similar postoperative functional outcomes to those with only rotator cuff tears, after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Level of evidence

III

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

RC:

Rotator cuff tears

OSS:

Oxford Shoulder Score

CSS:

Constant Shoulder Score

UCLASS:

University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score

VAS:

Visual Analog Scale

MCID:

Minimum clinically important difference

ROM:

Range of motion

EMG-NCS:

Electromyography and nerve conduction studies

References

  1. Ashkan K, Johnston P, Moore AJ (2002) A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and neurophysiological studies in the assessment of cervical radiculopathy. Br J Neurosurg 16:146–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cannon DE, Dillingham TR, Miao H, Andary MT, Pezzin LE (2007) Musculoskeletal disorders in referrals for suspected cervical radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88:1256–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang H, Park JB, Hwang JY, Song KJ (2003) Clinical analysis of cervical radiculopathy causing deltoid paralysis. Eur Spine J 12:517–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cvetanovich GL, Gowd AK, Liu JN, Nwachukwu BU, Cabarcas BC, Cole BJ et al (2019) Establishing clinically significant outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28:939–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, Yoon ST, Arnold PM, Massicotte EM et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95:1651–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gartsman GM, Brinker MR, Khan M (1998) Early effectiveness of arthroscopic repair for full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: an outcome analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 80:33–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gumina S, Carbone S, Arceri V, Rita A, Vestri AR, Postacchini F (2009) The relationship between chronic type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation and cervical spine pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hattrup SJ, Cofield RH (2010) Rotator cuff tears with cervical radiculopathy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:937–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hawkins RJ, Bilco T, Bonutti P (1990) Cervical spine and shoulder pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 142–146

  10. Katsuura Y, Bruce J, Taylor S, Gullota L, Kim HJ (2020) Overlapping, masquerading, and causative cervical spine and shoulder pathology: a systematic review. Glob Spine J 10:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lees F, Turner JW (1963) Natural history and prognosis of cervical spondylosis. Br Med J 2:1607–1610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Malige A, Morton PN, Carolan GF, Sokunbi G (2019) The operative treatment of shoulder pain in patients with a concurrent diagnosis of cervical spondylosis and shoulder dysfunction. J Spine Surg 5:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manifold SG, McCann PD (1999) Cervical radiculitis and shoulder disorders. Clin Orthop Relat Res 105–113

  14. McCann P, Weiss R, Bigliani L (1990) Results of anterior acromioplasty and rotator cuff repair in patients with impingement and cervical radiculopathy. Surgery of the shoulder. St. Louis Mosby Year Book 321–324

  15. Moorthy V, Tan AHC (2020) Should long head of biceps tenodesis or tenotomy be routinely performed in arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs? J Orthop 21:161–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ochiai N, Hashimoto E, Sasaki Y, Akimoto K, Sugaya H, Takahashi N et al (2017) Prevalence of concomitant neuropathy in large to massive rotator cuff tear using needle electromyography. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:e111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oh LS, Wolf BR, Hall MP, Levy BA, Marx RG (2007) Indications for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 455:52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Polascik BW, Bin Abd Razak HR, Chong HC, Lo NN, Yeo SJ (2018) Acceptable functional outcomes and patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty in Asians with severe knee stiffness: a matched analysis. Clin Orthop Surg 10:337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reza Soltani Z, Sajadi S, Tavana B (2014) A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with electrodiagnostic findings in the evaluation of clinical radiculopathy: a cross-sectional study. Eur Spine J 23:916–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roberson TA, Jew NB, Azar FM, Mauck BM, Dockery JD, Throckmorton TW (2015) Cervical radiculitis presenting as shoulder pain: frequency and results of multidisciplinary care. Curr Orthop Pract 26:521–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Romeo AA, Hang DW, Bach BR Jr, Shott S (1999) Repair of full thickness rotator cuff tears. Gender, age, and other factors affecting outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sembrano JN, Yson SC, Kanu OC, Braman JP, Santos ER, Harrison AK et al (2013) Neck-shoulder crossover: how often do neck and shoulder pathology masquerade as each other? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 42:E76-80

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vad VB, Southern D, Warren RF, Altchek DW, Dines D (2003) Prevalence of peripheral neurologic injuries in rotator cuff tears with atrophy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:333–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu S, Chen JY, Lie HME, Hao Y, Lie DTT (2020) Minimal clinically important difference of Oxford, constant, and UCLA shoulder score for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Orthop 19:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamaguchi K, Ditsios K, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Galatz LM, Teefey SA (2006) The demographic and morphological features of rotator cuff disease. A comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic shoulders. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88:1699–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang AL, Theologis AA, Tay B, Feeley BT (2015) The association between cervical spine pathology and rotator cuff dysfunction. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:E206-211

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VM and ML helped in data collection, statistical analysis and drafting the manuscript. JYC and DTTL conceived the study, study design and carried out the study. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikaesh Moorthy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

Approval from the institutional ethics committee (Institutional review board reference: CIRB 2019/2777) was obtained.

Informed consent

Written consent from each patient was obtained.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moorthy, V., Chen, J.Y., Lee, M. et al. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair results in similar postoperative functional outcomes in patients with only rotator cuff tears and those with concomitant cervical radiculopathy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 2564–2569 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06394-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06394-7

Keywords

Navigation