Skip to main content
Log in

Supraspinatus repair and biceps tenodesis in competitive CrossFit athletes allow for a 100% of return to sport

  • SHOULDER
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The shoulder is the most commonly injured body part in CrossFit training. The aim of this study is to report the clinical and MRI results of an arthroscopic repair of supraspinatus tear associated with SLAP lesion in competitive CrossFit athletes.

Methods

Competitive CrossFit athletes affected by a full-thickness supraspinatus tear associated with SLAP lesion secondary to training injury were prospectively enrolled in the study. Clinical diagnosis was confirmed with MRI (> 1.5 T). Functional evaluation was done using the Constant Score (CS) and ASES score (ASES). All lesions were treated with single-row repair and biceps tenodesis. Minimum follow-up (clinical, MRI) was 24 months.

Results

Nineteen patients were available at the final follow-up. The average age was 43-year-old (range 28–52, SD 8), 12 were males and 7 females. Pre-operative CS and ASES were 67 (range 61–77, SD 7) and 71 (range 62–79, SD 5), respectively. At the 24-month follow-up, 19/19 athletes resumed intensive training and 17/19 returned to competitions. CS and ASES rose to 90 (p = 0.039) and 93 (p = 0.04), respectively. At the final follow-up, MRI indicated complete healing of the tendon in 15 (79%) cases and 4 (21%) cases with type II Sugaya repair integrity. Two of the patients of the latter group did not return to their usual training level and showed type II (Kibler) scapular dyskinesis.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic repair of the supraspinatus tendon associated with biceps tenodesis led to a 100% of return-to-CrossFit training and 90% rate of individuals resuming competitions at 24 months of follow-up. MRI showed 15 (79%) cases of complete healing and 4 (21%) cases with type II Sugaya repair integrity; biceps tenodesis clinically failed only in 1 case and the athlete complained of a decrease in the competitions scores and opted to discontinue CrossFit competitions.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergeron MF, Nindl BC, Deuster PA et al (2011) Consortium for Health and Military Performance and American College of Sports Medicine consensus paper on extreme conditioning programs in military personnel. Curr Sports Med Rep 10(6):383–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cagle PJ Jr, London DA, Gluck MJ, Morel S, Parsons BO (2020) Long head of biceps tenodesis at the superior aspect of the biceps groove: A biomechanical comparison of inlay and onlay techniques. Shoulder Elbow 12(1):12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carbone S, Candela V, Gumina S (2020) High rate of return to crossfit training after arthroscopic management of rotator cuff tear. Orthop J Sports Med 8(4):2325967120911039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carbone S, Postacchini R, Gumina S (2015) Scapular dyskinesis and SICK syndrome in patients with a chronic type III acromioclavicular dislocation. Results of rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(5):1473–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Everhart JS, Poland S, Vajapey SP, Kirven JC, France TJ, Vasileff WK (2020) CrossFit-related hip and groin injuries: a case series. J Hip Preserv Surg 7(1):109–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnz072

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Feito Y, Burrows E, Tabb L, Ciesielka KA (2020) Breaking the myths of competition: a cross-sectional analysis of injuries among CrossFit trained participants. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 6(1):e000750. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000750

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kibler WB, Sciascia A, Wilkes T (2012) Scapular dyskinesis and its relation to shoulder injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(6):364–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, Jun BJ, DeLaMora SN, Kvitne RS et al (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34:407–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA (2005) Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 5(33):1861–1868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mehrab M, de Vos RJ, Kraan GA et al (2017) Injury incidence and patterns among Dutch CrossFit athletes. Orthop J Sports Med 5(12):2325967117745263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Merolla G, Chillemi C, Franceschini V, Cerciello S, Ippolito G, Paladini P, Porcellini G (2015) Tendon transfer for irreparable cuff tears: indications and surgical rationale. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 4(4):425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mihata T, Watanabe C, Fukunishi K, Ohue M, Tsujimura T, Fujiwara K, Kinoshita M (2011) Functional and structural outcomes of single-row versus double-row versus combined double-row and suture-bridge repair for rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 39(10):2091–2098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Motley GS, Guengerich B, Schuller T, Turbyfill A (2018) The Ramp Test: an arthroscopic technique for confirming intra-articular subluxation and instability of the long head of the bicep tendon within the shoulder. Arthrosc Tech 7(4):e327–e330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Snyder SJ (2002) Arthroscopic classification of rotator cuff lesions and surgical decision making Shoulder arthroscopy, 2nd edn. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, p 204

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J (2007) Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(5):953–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Szeles PRQ, da Costa TS, da Cunha RA, Hespanhol L, Pochini AC, Ramos LA, Cohen M (2020) CrossFit and the epidemiology of musculoskeletal injuries: a prospective 12-week cohort study. Orthop J Sports Med 8(3):2325967120908884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Warner JP, Krushell RJ, Masquelet A, Gerber C (1992) Anatomy and relationships of the suprascapular nerve: anatomical constraints to mobilization of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles in the management of massive rotator-cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:36–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Waterman BR, Arroyo W, Heida K, Burks R, Pallis M (2015) SLAP repairs with combined procedures have lower failure rate than isolated repairs in a Military population: Surgical outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med 3(8):2325967115599154. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967115599154

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Weisenthal BM, Beck CA, Maloney MD, DeHaven KE, Giordano BD (2014) Injury rate and patterns among CrossFit athletes. Orthop J Sports Med 2(4):2325967114531177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Carbone.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was carried out in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

All athletes signed informed consent and were informed about the purpose of the research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carbone, S., Castagna, V., Passaretti, D. et al. Supraspinatus repair and biceps tenodesis in competitive CrossFit athletes allow for a 100% of return to sport. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 3929–3935 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06345-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06345-2

Keywords

Navigation