Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Japanese version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale has acceptable validity and reliability

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The anterior cruciate ligament-return to sports after injury (ACL-RSI) scale assesses the psychological impact of returning to sports (also referred to as psychological readiness) after ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate important measurement properties of the Japanese version of ACL-RSI scale.

Methods

Ninety-three participants who underwent ACL reconstruction filled out the Japanese version of ACL-RSI scale, the Tampa scale for kinesiophobia (TSK), the International Knee Documentation Committee-Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). To assess test re-test reliability, 50 of the 93 participants re-answered the Japanese version of ACL-RSI scale within 10 days. Floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, construct validity, and reliability of the Japanese version of ACL-RSI scale were analysed.

Results

There were no floor and ceiling effects. The Japanese version of ACL-RSI scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.912). It was positively correlated with total points of IKDC-SKF and the Lysholm score, and with the all sub-categories of the KOOS, and it was negatively correlated with the TSK. Reliability of the Japanese version of ACL-RSI scale was satisfactory.

Conclusion

The Japanese version of ACL-RSI scale has acceptable measurement properties. It can be a useful for evaluation of psychological readiness for return to sports in Japanese athletes who undergo primary ACL reconstruction. Information provided by the Japanese version of the ACL-RSI scale may also help to identify athletes who find return to sport a challenge, and guide conversations regarding treatment and rehabilitation plans.

Level of evidence

II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ardern CL, Osterberg A, Tagesson S, Gauffin H, Webster KE, Kvist J (2014) The impact of psychological readiness to return to sport and recreational activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med 48:1613–1619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2013) A systematic review of the psychological factors associated with returning to sport following injury. Br J Sports Med 47:1120–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2012) Fear of re-injury in people who have returned to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Sci Med Sport 15:488–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Whitehead TS, Webster KE (2013) Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 41:1549–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA (2011) Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med 45:596–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bohu Y, Klouche S, Lefevre N, Webster K, Herman S (2015) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1192–1196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen T, Zhang P, Li Y, Webster K, Zhang J, Yao W et al (2017) Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale. PLoS ONE 12:e0183095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Collins NJ, Prinsen CA, Christensen R, Bartels EM, Terwee CB, Roos EM (2016) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthr Cartil 24:1317–1329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cozzi AL, Dunn KL, Harding JL, McLeod TCV, Bacon CEW (2015) Kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in physically active individuals. J Sport Rehab 24:434–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Damsgård E, Fors T, Anke A, Røe C (2007) The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia: a Rasch analysis of its properties in subjects with low back and more widespread pain. J Rehabil Med 39:672–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Delincé P, Ghafil D (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament tears: conservative or surgical treatment? A critical review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:48–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. George SZ, Lentz TA, Zeppieri G, Lee D, Chmielewski TL (2012) Analysis of shortened versions of the tampa scale for kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing scale for patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin J Pain 28:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harput G, Tok D, Ulusoy B, Eraslan L, Yildiz TI, Turgut E et al (2017) Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale into Turkish. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris JD, Abrams GD, Bach BR, Williams D, Heidloff D, Bush-Joseph CA et al (2014) Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 37:e103–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirohata K, Aizawa J, Ohmi T, Ohji S, Yagishita K et al (2017) Development of the Japanese version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sports after injury scale. Phys Therapy Jpn 44:433–439

    Google Scholar 

  17. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P et al (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jia ZY, Cui J, Wang W, Xue CC, Liu TZ, Huang X et al (2018) Translation and validation of the simplified Chinese version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:2997–3003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Karlsson J, Becker R (2015) Return to sports after ACL reconstruction: individual considerations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1271–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kikuchi N, Matsudaira K, Sawada T, Oka H (2015) Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-J) in patients with whiplash neck injury pain and/or low back pain. J Orthop Sci 20:985–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kori S (1990) Kinisophobia: a new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Manage 3:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kvist J, Ek A, Sporrstedt K, Good L (2005) Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:393–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kvist J, Österberg A, Gauffin H, Tagesson S, Webster K, Ardern C (2013) Translation and measurement properties of the Swedish version of ACL-Return to Sports after Injury questionnaire. Scand J Med Sci Sports 23:568–575

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Langford JL, Webster KE, Feller JA (2009) A prospective longitudinal study to assess psychological changes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Br J Sports Med 43:377–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lentz TA, Zeppieri G, George SZ, Tillman SM, Moser MW, Farmer KW et al (2015) Comparison of physical impairment, functional, and psychosocial measures based on fear of reinjury/lack of confidence and return-to-sport status after ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43:345–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4:293–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Neblett R, Hartzell MM, Mayer TG, Bradford EM, Gatchel RJ (2016) Establishing clinically meaningful severity levels for the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-13). Eur J Pain 20:701–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ra HJ, Kim HS, Choi JY, Ha JK, Kim JY, Kim JG (2014) Comparison of the ceiling effect in the Lysholm score and the IKDC subjective score for assessing functional outcome after ACL reconstruction. Knee 21:906–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Silva LO, Mendes LMR, Lima POP, Almeida GPL (2018) Translation, cross-adaptation and measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the ACL-RSI Scale and ACL-QoL Questionnaire in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Braz J Phys Ther 22:127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Slagers AJ, Reininga IHF, van den Akker-Scheek I (2017) The Dutch language anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury scale (ACL-RSI)—validity and reliability. J Sports Sci 35:393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. te Wierike SC, van der Sluis A, van den Akker-Scheek I, Elferink-Gemser MT, Visscher C (2013) Psychosocial factors influencing the recovery of athletes with anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports 23:527–540

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  34. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tjong VK, Murnaghan ML, Nyhof-Young JM, Ogilvie-Harris DJ (2014) A qualitative investigation of the decision to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: to play or not to play. Am J Sports Med 42:336–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Webster KE, Feller JA, Lambros C (2008) Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Phys Ther Sport 9:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Woby SR, Roach NK, Urmston M, Watson PJ (2005) Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: a shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Pain 117:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external source of funding was used.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Hirohata.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Tokyo Medical and Dental University.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants included in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hirohata, K., Aizawa, J., Furuya, H. et al. The Japanese version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale has acceptable validity and reliability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28, 2519–2525 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05849-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05849-1

Keywords

Navigation