Biceps tenotomy has earlier pain relief compared to biceps tenodesis: a randomized prospective study
- 94 Downloads
Surgical management for long head of the biceps (LHB) tendinopathy with either biceps tenotomy or tenodesis is a reliable, but debated treatment option. The aim of this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study is to evaluate differences in pain relief and subjective outcomes between biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis for LHB tendinopathy.
Subjects were randomized and blinded to biceps tenotomy versus arthroscopic tenodesis intra-operatively. Outcomes evaluated included subjective patient outcome scores, pain, and cosmetic deformity. Subjective outcomes scores and pain were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA, controlling for concomitant rotator cuff repair. Binary outcomes were compared using Chi-square tests.
Thirty-four subjects (31 male, 3 female) with a median age of 56 (range 30–77) were enrolled. Twenty subjects were randomized to tenotomy and 14 to tenodesis. Fifty-six percent had concomitant rotator cuff repairs. The mean VAS pain score at 3 months was lower with tenotomy versus tenodesis. 2-year follow-up demonstrated no statistically significant differences for VAS, ASES, or SANE. 15/20 (75%) subjects with biceps tenotomy reported no pain medication use at the 2-week postoperative visit versus 5/14 (33%) for biceps tenodesis. Popeye deformity was found in 5/20 (25%) of tenotomy subjects versus 1/14 (7%) in tenodesis subjects.
Outcomes appear similar between biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis; however, the tenotomy group demonstrated greater incidence of cosmetic deformity but an earlier improvement in postoperative pain.
Level of evidence
Treatment Studies, Level II.
KeywordsBicep tenodesis Tenotomy Randomized Prospective Arthroscopy
The funding was provided by the Piedmont Orthopaedic Research Foundation.
Research funding was awarded from the Piedmont Orthopaedic Research Society.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Dr. Garrigues received research support from Arthrex and Smith & Nephew. No other authors have relevant disclosures or conflict of interest.
This randomized, prospective, single-blinded study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Durham VA Medical Center, ID number 01407.
- 3.Boileau P, Baque F, Valerio L, Ahrens P, Chuinard C, Trojani C (2007) Isolated arthroscopic biceps tenotomy or tenodesis improves symptoms in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):747–757Google Scholar
- 5.Clarke TC, Nahin RL, Barnes PM, Stussman BJ (2016) Use of complementary health approaches for musculoskeletal pain disorders among adults: United States, 2012. National Health Stat Rep 98:1–12Google Scholar