Advertisement

Biceps tenotomy has earlier pain relief compared to biceps tenodesis: a randomized prospective study

  • Elshaday S. BelayEmail author
  • Jocelyn R. Wittstein
  • Grant E. Garrigues
  • Tally E. Lassiter
  • Melissa Scribani
  • Richard D. Goldner
  • Christopher A. Bean
SHOULDER
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

 Surgical management for long head of the biceps (LHB) tendinopathy with either biceps tenotomy or tenodesis is a reliable, but debated treatment option. The aim of this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study is to evaluate differences in pain relief and subjective outcomes between biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis for LHB tendinopathy.

Methods

 Subjects were randomized and blinded to biceps tenotomy versus arthroscopic tenodesis intra-operatively. Outcomes evaluated included subjective patient outcome scores, pain, and cosmetic deformity. Subjective outcomes scores and pain were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA, controlling for concomitant rotator cuff repair. Binary outcomes were compared using Chi-square tests.

Results

 Thirty-four subjects (31 male, 3 female) with a median age of 56 (range 30–77) were enrolled. Twenty subjects were randomized to tenotomy and 14 to tenodesis. Fifty-six percent had concomitant rotator cuff repairs. The mean VAS pain score at 3 months was lower with tenotomy versus tenodesis. 2-year follow-up demonstrated no statistically significant differences for VAS, ASES, or SANE. 15/20 (75%) subjects with biceps tenotomy reported no pain medication use at the 2-week postoperative visit versus 5/14 (33%) for biceps tenodesis. Popeye deformity was found in 5/20 (25%) of tenotomy subjects versus 1/14 (7%) in tenodesis subjects.

Conclusion

Outcomes appear similar between biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis; however, the tenotomy group demonstrated greater incidence of cosmetic deformity but an earlier improvement in postoperative pain.

Level of evidence

Treatment Studies, Level II.

Keywords

Bicep tenodesis Tenotomy Randomized Prospective Arthroscopy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The funding was provided by the Piedmont Orthopaedic Research Foundation.

Funding

Research funding was awarded from the Piedmont Orthopaedic Research Society.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Garrigues received research support from Arthrex and Smith & Nephew. No other authors have relevant disclosures or conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This randomized, prospective, single-blinded study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Durham VA Medical Center, ID number 01407.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahrens PM, Boileau P (2007) The long head of biceps and associated tendinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(8):1001–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker DA, Cofield RH (1989) Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii for chronic bicipital tendinitis: long–term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(3):376–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boileau P, Baque F, Valerio L, Ahrens P, Chuinard C, Trojani C (2007) Isolated arthroscopic biceps tenotomy or tenodesis improves symptoms in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):747–757Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castricini R, Familiari F, De Gori M, Riccelli DA, De Benedetto M, Orlando N (2018) Tenodesis is not superior to tenotomy in the treatment of the long head of biceps tendon lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clarke TC, Nahin RL, Barnes PM, Stussman BJ (2016) Use of complementary health approaches for musculoskeletal pain disorders among adults: United States, 2012. National Health Stat Rep 98:1–12Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elser F, Braun S, Dewing CB, Giphart JE, Millett PJ (2011) Anatomy, function, injuries and treatment of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon. Arthroscopy 27(4):581–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frost A, Zafar MS, Maffuli N (2009) Tenotomy versus tenodesis in the management of pathologic lesions of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii. Am J Sports Med 37(4):828–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friedman DJ, Dunn JC, Higgins LD, Warner JJ (2005) Proximal biceps tendon: injuries and management. Sports Med Arthrosc 16(3):162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friedman JL, Fitzpatrick JL, Rylander LS, Bennett C, Vidal AF, McCarty EC (2015) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis in active patients younger than 55 years: Is there a difference in strength and outcomes? Orthop J Sports Med 3(2):1.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967115570848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hsu AR, Ghodadra NS, Provenchar MT, Lewis PB, Bach BR (2011) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(2):326–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galasso O, Gasparini G, De Benedetto M, Familiari F, Castricini R (2012) Tenotomy versus tenodesis in the treatment of the long head of biceps brachii tendon lesions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ge H, Zhang Q, Li J, Sun L, Cheng B (2015) Tenotomy or tenodesis for long head of biceps lesions in shoulders: a systematic review and meta–analysis. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0121286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gill TJ, McIrvin E, Mair SD, Hawkins RJ (2001) Results of biceps tenotomy for treatment of pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10(3):247–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gurnani N, van Deurzen DF, Janmaat VT, van den Bekerom MP (2016) Tenotomy or tenodesis for pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii: a systematic review and meta–analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3765–3771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kelly AM, Drakos MC, Fealy S, Taylor SA, O’Brien SJ (2005) Arthroscopic release of the long head of the biceps tendon. Am J Sport Med 33(2):208–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khazzam M, George MS, Churchill RS, Kuhn JE (2012) Disorders of the long head of biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(1):136–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koh KH, Ahn JH, Kim SM, Yoo JC (2010) Treatment of biceps tendon lesions in the setting of rotator cuff tears: prospective cohort study of tenotomy versus tenodesis. Am J Sports Med 38(8):1584–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leroux T, Chahal J, Wasserstein D, Verma NN, Romeo AA (2015) A systematic review and meta–analysis comparing clinical outcomes after concurrent rotator cuff repair and long head biceps tenodesis and tenotomy. Sports Health 7(4):303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levy AS, Kelly BT, Lintner SA, Osbahr DC, Speer KP (2001) Function of the long head of the biceps at the shoulder: electromyographic analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10(3):250–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mazzocca AD, Rios CG, Romeo AA, Arciero RA (2005) Subpectoral biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 21(7):896–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meeks BD, Meeks NM, Froehle AW, Wareing E, Bonner KF (2017) Patient satisfaction after biceps tenotomy. Orthop J Sports Med 5(5):2325967117707737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mitchell C, Adebajo A, Hay E, Carr A (2005) Shoulder pain: diagnosis and management in primary care. BMJ 331(7525):1124–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Murthi AM, Vosburgh CL, Neviaser TJ (2000) The incidence of pathologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9(5):382–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nho SJ, Reiff SN, Verma NN, Slabaugh MA, Mazzocca AD, Romeo AA (2010) Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: Low rates of incidence following surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(5):764–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Osbahr DC, Diamond AB, Speer KP (2002) The cosmetic appearance of the biceps muscle after long–head tenotomy versus tenodesis. Arthroscopy 18(5):483–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pagnani MJ, Deng XH, Warren RF, Torzilli PA, O’Brien SJ (1996) Role of the long head of the biceps brachii in glenohumeral stability: a biomechanical study in cadaver. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 5(4):255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Patel KV, Bravman J, Vidal A, Chrisman A, McCarty E (2016) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis. Clin Sports Med 35(1):93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sethi N, Wright R, Yamaguchi K (1999) Disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(6):644–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Slenker NR, Lawson K, Ciccotti MG, Dodson CC, Cohen SB (2012) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy 28(4):576–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shang X, Chen J, Chen S (2017) A meta–analysis comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for treating rotator cuff tears combined with long head of biceps tendon lesions. PLoS ONE 12(10):e0185788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shank JR, Singleton SB, Braun S, Kissenberth MJ, Ramappa A, Ellis H, Decker MJ, Hawkins RJ, Torry MR (2011) A comparison of forearm supination and elbow flexion strength in patients with long head of the biceps tenotomy or tenodesis. Arthroscopy 27(1):9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Virk MS, Nicholson GP (2016) Complications of proximal biceps tenotomy and tenodesis. Clin Sports Med 35(1):181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wittstein J, Queen R, Abbey A, Toth A, Moorman CT III (2011) Isokinetic strength, endurance, and subjective outcomes after biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a postoperative study. Am J Sports Med 39(4):857–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang Q, Zhou J, Ge H, Cheng B (2015) Tenotomy or tenodesis for long head of biceps lesions in shoulders with reparable rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Trauma Arthrosc 23(2):464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elshaday S. Belay
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jocelyn R. Wittstein
    • 1
  • Grant E. Garrigues
    • 2
  • Tally E. Lassiter
    • 1
  • Melissa Scribani
    • 3
  • Richard D. Goldner
    • 1
  • Christopher A. Bean
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical CenterDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUK
  2. 2.Midwest Orthopaedics at RushRush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Center for BiostatisticsBassett Research InstituteCooperstownUSA

Personalised recommendations