Skip to main content
Log in

Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The currently used system to classify the lower limb alignment (neutral, varus, valgus) does not consider the orientation of the joint line or its relationship to the overall lower limb alignment. Similarly, current total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment concepts do not sufficiently consider the variability of the native coronal alignment. Therefore, the purpose of this study was (1) to introduce a new classification system for the lower limb alignment, based on phenotypes, and (2) to compare the alignment targets of different TKA alignment concepts with the native alignment of non-osteoarthritic patients.

Methods

Two recent articles phenotyped the lower limb, the femur and tibia of 308 non-osteoarthritic knees of 160 patients [male to female ratio = 102:58, mean age ± standard deviation 30 ± 7 years (16–44 years)]. The present study introduces functional knee phenotypes, which are a combination of all previously introduced phenotypes. The functional knee phenotypes therefore enable an evaluation of all parameters in relation to each other and thus a comprehensive analysis of the coronal alignment. The existing functional knee phenotypes in the female and male population were investigated. In addition, how many non-osteoarthritic knees had an alignment within the range of current TKA alignment targets (mechanical, anatomical and restricted kinematic alignment) was investigated. Therefore, it was defined which functional knee phenotypes represented a target of the TKA alignment concepts and which percentage of the population had such a phenotype.

Results

Out of 125 possible functional knee phenotypes, 43 were found (35 male, 26 and 18 mutual). The most common functional knee phenotype in males was NEUHKA0° + NEUFMA0° + NEUTMA0° (19%), followed by VARHKA3° + NEUFMA0° + VARTMA0° (8.2%). The most common functional knee phenotype in females was NEUHKA0° + NEUFMA0° + NEUTMA0° (17.7%), closely followed by NEUHKA0° + NEUFMA0° + VALTMA0° (16.6%). The functional knee phenotype representing a mechanical alignment target was found in 5.6% of the males and 3.6% of the females. The phenotype representing an anatomical alignment target was found in 18% of the males and 17% in females. Five of the nine phenotypes representing a restricted kinematic alignment target were found in this population (male 5, female 4, mutual 4). They represented 31.3% of all males and 45.1% of all females.

Conclusion

A more individualized approach to TKA alignment is needed. The functional knee phenotypes enable a simple, but detailed assessment of a patient’s individual anatomy and thereby could be a helpful tool to individualize the approach to TKA.

Level of clinical evidence

III, retrospective cohort study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

FMA:

Femoral mechanical angle

HKA:

Hip–knee–ankle angle

HDP:

Hydroxymethane diphosphonate

NEU:

Neutral

OA:

Osteoarthritis

SD:

Standard deviation

SPECT:

Single-photon emission computed tomography

TMA:

Tibial mechanical angle

TKA:

Total knee arthroplasty

VAL:

Valgus

VAR:

Varus

References

  1. Almaawi AM, Hutt JRB, Masse V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli P-A (2017) The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:2133–2140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:45–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooke D, Scudamore A, Li J, Wyss U, Bryant T et al (1997) Axial lower-limb alignment: comparison of knee geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthr Cartil 5:39–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM et al (2005) Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87(Suppl 2):71–80

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hirschmann MT, Karlsson J, Becker R (2018) Hot topic: alignment in total knee arthroplasty-systematic versus more individualised alignment strategies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1587–1588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF et al (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:629–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirschmann MT, Müller W (2015) Complex function of the knee joint: the current understanding of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2780–2788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hovinga KR, Lerner AL (2009) Anatomic variations between Japanese and Caucasian populations in the healthy young adult knee joint. J Orthop Res 27:1191–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Howell SM, Hull ML (2017) Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. In: Scott S (ed) Insall and scott surgery of the knee. Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, pp 1784–1796

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hungerford DS, Krackow KA (1985) Total joint arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 192:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hutt JRB, LeBlanc M-A, Massé V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli P-A (2016) Kinematic TKA using navigation: surgical technique and initial results. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102:99–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA (1985) Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 192:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jorn LP, Johnsson R, Toksvig-Larsen S (1999) Patient satisfaction, function and return to work after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 70:343–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin Y-H, Chang F-S, Chen K-H, Huang K-C, Su K-C (2018) Mismatch between femur and tibia coronal alignment in the knee joint: classification of five lower limb types according to femoral and tibial mechanical alignment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19:411

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Moser LB, Hess S, Amsler F, Behrend H, Hirschmann MT (2019) Native non-osteoarthritic knees have a highly variable coronal alignment: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05417-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB (2006) The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:35–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang WM, Zhu YH, Chiu KY (2000) Axial alignment of the lower extremity in Chinese adults. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82:1603–1608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Than P, Szuper K, Somoskeöy S, Warta V, Illés T (2012) Geometrical values of the normal and arthritic hip and knee detected with the EOS imaging system. Int Orthop 36:1291–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirschmann MT, Hess S, Behrend H, Amsler F, Leclercq V, Moser LB (2019) Phenotyping of hip-knee-ankle angle in young non-osteoarthritic knees provides better understanding of native alignment variability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05507-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclercq V, Hess S (2019) Phenotyping the knee in young non-osteoarthritic knees shows a wide distribution of femoral and tibial coronal alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05508-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The statistical analysis was funded by Symbios, Yverdon les Bains, Switzerland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael T. Hirschmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research and that institutional approval of the human protocol for this investigation was obtained.

Informed consent

Informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hirschmann, M.T., Moser, L.B., Amsler, F. et al. Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 1394–1402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05509-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05509-z

Keywords

Navigation