Meniscal allograft transplantation: undersizing grafts can lead to increased rates of clinical and mechanical failure
- 164 Downloads
To assess mid-term survivorship of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) and determine the effect that pre-operative meniscal sizing has upon functional outcome and mechanical survivorship.
A prospectively collected database of patients receiving MAT from 2001 to 2017 was analysed. Data include demographics; sizing measurements, complications, further surgery, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Allografts were fresh frozen, non-irradiated, and sized using the Pollard technique.
Seventy-three MATs were performed in 67 patients; mean age at MAT was 34 years (range 14–52 years). 56% were male and 62% were medial. The mean follow-up was 75 months (6.25 years). Mechanical survival at 5 and 10 years was 96% and 89.4%, respectively. There were statistically significant improvements in all PROMs; mean Lysholm score improved by 17.5 points [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.2–12.9, p < 0.001]; mean IKDC score improved significantly by 13.3 points (CI 19.3–7.4, p < 0.001); mean OKS improved by 5.6 points (CI 9.2–2.2, p < 0.002); and the median Tegner improved by 1 point. Forty-one MATs (56%) were undersized for width (range 1–11 mm). Seven MATs (10%) were undersized for length (range 1–4 mm). There was no statistically significant difference in mechanical survivorship or clinical outcomes between undersized, matched, or oversized grafts overall; however, sub-group analysis demonstrated increased failure when allografts were undersized by more than 5 mm in width.
MAT is an effective treatment to improve function and alleviate pain with excellent survivorship in this series. Accepting an allograft that is more than 5 mm smaller in width than pre-operative templating increases the likelihood of clinical and mechanical failure. We, therefore, urge surgeons to be familiar with the measuring process used by their individual tissue bank provider to avoid graft–host mismatch that could affect outcome.
KeywordsMeniscus Allograft Transplant Sizing Patient-reported outcome measure Survivorship
There has been no funding received for this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 12.Kim N-K, Bin S-I, Kim J-M, Lee B-S, Lee C-R (2018) Meniscal extrusion is positively correlated with the anatomical position changes of the meniscal anterior and posterior horns, following medial meniscal allograft transplantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5195-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Kurosawa H, Fukubayashi T, Nakajima H (1980) Load-bearing mode of the knee joint: physical behavior of the knee joint with or without menisci. Clin Orthop 149:283–290Google Scholar
- 29.Samitier G, Alentorn-Geli E, Taylor DC, Rill B, Lock T, Moutzouros V et al (2015) Meniscal allograft transplantation. Part 2: systematic review of transplant timing, outcomes, return to competition, associated procedures, and prevention of osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(1):323–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Zaffagnini S, Grassi A, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Benzi A, Serra M, Rotini M et al (2016) Survivorship and clinical outcomes of 147 consecutive isolated or combined arthroscopic bone plug free meniscal allograft transplantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(5):1432–1439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar