Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with greater tibial tunnel widening when using a bioabsorbable screw compared to an all-inside technique with suspensory fixation

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

To compare clinical outcomes and tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) performed with an all-inside technique (Group A) or with a bioabsorbable tibial screw and suspensory femoral fixation (Group B).

Methods

Tunnel widening was assessed using computed tomography (CT) and a previously validated analytical best fit cylinder technique at approximately 1-year following ACLR. Clinical follow-up comprised evaluation with IKDC, KSS, Tegner, Lysholm scores, and knee laxity assessment.

Results

The study population comprised 22 patients in each group with a median clinical follow-up of 24 months (range 21–27 months). The median duration between ACLR and CT was 13 months (range 12–14 months). There were no significant differences in clinical outcome measures between groups. There were no differences between groups with respect to femoral tunnel widening. However, there was a significantly larger increase in tibial tunnel widening, at the middle portion, in Group B (2.4 ± 1.5 mm) compared to Group A (0.8 ± 0.4 mm) (p = 0.027), and also at the articular portion in Group B (1.5 ± 0.8 mm) compared to Group A (0.8 ± 0.8 mm) (p = 0.027).

Conclusion

Tibial tunnel widening after ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft is significantly greater with suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw when compared to an all-inside technique at a median follow-up of 2 years. The clinical relevance of this work lies in the rebuttal of concerns arising from biomechanical studies regarding the possibility of increased tunnel widening with an all-inside technique.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burnham JM, Malempati CS, Carpiaux A, Ireland ML, Johnson DL (2017) Anatomic femoral and tibial tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial portal all-inside and outside-in techniques. Arthrosc Tech 6(2):e275–e282

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Colombet P, Graveleau N, Jambou S (2016) Incorporation of hamstring grafts within the tibial tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: magnetic resonance imaging of suspensory fixation versus interference screws. Am J Sports Med 44(11):2838–2845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Crespo B, Aga C, Wilson KJ, Pomeroy SM, LaPrade RF, Engebretsen L, Wijdicks CA (2014) Measurements of bone tunnel size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2D versus 3D computed tomography model. J Exp Orthop 1(1):2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Beus A, Koch JE, Hirschmann A, Hirschmann MT (2017) How to evaluate bone tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction—a critical review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 7(2):230–239

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fahey M, Indelicato PA (1994) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament replacement. Am J Sports Med 22(3):410–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fink C, Zapp M, Benedetto KP, Wolfgang H, Hoser C, Rieger M (2001) Tibial tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 17(2):138–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris NL, Indelicato PA, Bloomberg MS, Meister K, Wheeler DL (2002) Radiographic and histologic analysis of the tibial tunnel after allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in goats. Am J Sports Med 30(3):368–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Höher J, Möller HD, Fu FH (1998) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(4):231–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iorio R, Di Sanzo V, Vadalà A, Conteduca J, Mazza D, Redler A et al (2013) ACL reconstruction with hamstrings: how different technique and fixation devices influence bone tunnel enlargement. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 17(21):2956–2961

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Irrgang JJ, Ho H, Harner CD, Fu FH (1998) Use of the international knee documentation committee guidelines to assess outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(2):107–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karikis I, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Rostgård-Christensen L, Kartus J (2017) Radiographic tibial tunnel assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts and biocomposite screws: a prospective study with 5-Year follow-up. Arthroscopy 33(12):2184–2194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim SG, Kurosawa H, Sakuraba K, Ikeda H, Takazawa S, Takazawa Y (2005) Development and application of an inside to-out drill bit for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21 (8):1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lanzetti RM, Monaco E, De Carli A, Grasso A, Ciompi A, Sigillo R, Argento G, Ferretti A (2016) Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study. Knee 23(5):837–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lubowitz JH, Ahmad CS, Anderson K (2011) All-inside anterior cruciate ligament graft-link technique: Second generation, no-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27(5):717–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lubowitz JH, Schwartzberg R, Smith P (2015) Cortical suspensory button versus aperture interference screw fixation for knee anterior cruciate ligament soft-tissue allograft: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy 31(9):1733–1739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marchant MH Jr, Willimon SC, Vinson E et al (2010) Comparison of plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(8):1059–1064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayr R, Heinrichs CH, Eichinger M, Coppola C, Schmoelz W, Attal R (2015) Biomechanical comparison of 2 anterior cruciate ligament graft preparation techniques for tibial fixation: adjustable-length loop cortical button or interference screw. Am J Sports Med 43(6):1380–1385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayr R, Smekal V, Koidl C, Coppola C, Fritz J, Rudisch A, Kranewitter C, Attal R (2017) Tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with aperture screw fixation or all-inside reconstruction with suspensory cortical button fixation: volumetric measurements on CT and MRI scans. Knee 24(5):1047–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McAdams TR, Biswal S, Stevens KJ, Beaulieu CF, Mandelbaum BR (2008) Tibial aperture bone disruption after retrograde versus antegrade tibial tunnel drilling: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(9):818–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mermerkaya MU, Atay OA, Kaymaz B, Bekmez S, Karaaslan F, Doral MN (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring graft: a retrospective comparison of tunnel widening upon use of two different femoral fixation methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(8):2283–2291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Monaco E, Bachmaier S, Fabbri M, Lanzetti RM, Wijdicks CA, Ferretti A (2018) Intraoperative workflow for all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical evaluation of preconditioning and knot tying. Arthroscopy 34(2):538–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Monaco E, Fabbri M, Lanzetti RM, Del Duca A, Labianca L, Ferretti A (2017) Biomechanical comparison of four coupled fixation systems for ACL reconstruction with bone socket or full-tunnel on the tibial side. Knee 24(4):705–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mulcahey MK, David TS, Epstein DM, Alaia MJ, Montgomery KD (2014) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using soft-tissue graft and expandable fixation. Arthroscopy 30(11):1461–1467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Osti M, Krawinkel A, Hoffelner T, Benedetto KP (2015) Quantification of tibial bone loss in antegrade versus retrograde tunnel placement for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 39(8):1611–1614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Prentice HA, Lind M, Mouton C, Persson A, Magnusson H, Gabr A, Seil R, Engebretsen L, Samuelsson K, Karlsson J, Forssblad M, Haddad FS, Spalding T, Funahashi TT, Paxton LW, Maletis GB (2018) Patient demographic and surgical characteristics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a description of registries from six countries. Br J Sports Med 52(11):716–722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Robbrecht C, Claes S, Cromheecke M, Mahieu P, Kakavelakis K, Victor J, Bellemans J, Verdonk P (2014) Reliability of a semi-automated 3D-CT measuring method for tunnel diameters after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between soft-tissue single-bundle allograft vs. autograft. Knee 21(5):926–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rodeo SA, Arnoczky SP, Torzilli PA, Hidaka C, Warren RF (1993) Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog. J Bone Jt Surg Am 75(12):1795–1803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sabzevari S, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Shaikh HS, Arner JW, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2017) Increased lateral tibial posterior slope is related to tibial tunnel widening after primary ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(12):3906–3913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith PA, Stannard JP, Pfeiffer FM, Kuroki K, Bozynski CC, Cook JL (2016) Suspensory versus interference screw fixation for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a translational large-animal model. Arthroscopy 32(6):1086–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vadalà A, Iorio R, De Carli A, Argento G, Di Sanzo V, Conteduca F et al (2007) The effect of accelerated, brace free, rehabilitation on bone tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons: a CT study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(4):365–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external funding was used.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Unit and Kirk Kilgour Sports Injury Center, S. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy

    Edoardo Monaco, Mattia Fabbri, Andrea Redler, Edoardo Gaj, Angelo De Carli & Andrea Ferretti

  2. Department of radiology, S. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Rome, Italy

    Giuseppe Argento

  3. Southport and Ormskirk Hospitals NHS Trust, Town Lane, Southport, England, UK

    Adnan Saithna

Authors
  1. Edoardo Monaco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mattia Fabbri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Redler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edoardo Gaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Angelo De Carli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Giuseppe Argento
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Adnan Saithna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Andrea Ferretti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edoardo Monaco.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Edoardo Monaco, Andrea Ferretti and Angelo De Carli declares to be consultant for Arthrex.

Ethical approval

All procedure performed in the study involving humans participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monaco, E., Fabbri, M., Redler, A. et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with greater tibial tunnel widening when using a bioabsorbable screw compared to an all-inside technique with suspensory fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 2577–2584 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5275-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5275-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation