Athletes experience a high rate of return to sport following hip arthroscopy
- 183 Downloads
The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the rate at which patients return to sport following arthroscopic hip surgery.
The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched by two reviewers, and titles, abstracts, and full-text articles screened in duplicate. English language studies investigating hip arthroscopy with reported return to sport outcomes were included. A meta-analysis of proportions was used to combine the rate of return to sports using a random effects model.
Overall, 38 studies with 1773 patients (72% male), with a mean age of 27.6 years (range 11–65) and mean follow-up of 28.1 months (range 3–144) were included in this review. The pooled rate of return to sport was: 93% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 87–97%] at any level of participation; 82% (95% CI = 74–88%) at preoperative level of sporting activity; 89% (95% CI = 84–93%) for competitive athletes; 95% (95% CI = 89–98%) in pediatric patients; and 94% (95% CI 89.2–98.0%) in professional athletes. There was significant correlation between a shorter duration of preoperative symptoms and a higher rate of return to sports (Pearson correlation coefficient = − 0.711, p = 0.021).
Hip arthroscopy yields a high rate of return to sport, in addition to marked improvement in pain and function in the majority of patients. The highest rates of return to sport were noted in pediatric patients, professional athletes, and those with a shorter duration of preoperative symptoms. This study provides clinicians with evidence-based data on athletes’ abilities to return to sport after arthroscopic hip surgery and identifies sub-populations with the highest rates of return to sport.
Level of evidence
IV, systematic review of Level II–IV studies.
KeywordsHip Arthroscopy Return to sports Femoroacetabular impingement
None were declared.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no competing interest.
This is a systematic review of the literature and no ethics approval is required.
Informed consent was not applicable to this study.
- 2.Takagi K (1982) Arthroscope. Clin Orthop Relat Res 167:6–8Google Scholar
- 23.Miller JJ (1978) The inverse of the Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation. Am Stat 32:138–139Google Scholar
- 25.Barastegui D, Seijas R, Alvarez-Diaz P, Rivera E, Alentorn-Geli E, Steinbacher G, Cuscó X, Cugat R (2018) Assessing long-term return to play after hip arthroscopy in football players evaluating risk factors for good prognosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(3):963–968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Cvetanovich GL, Weber AE, Kuhns BD, Hannon CP, D'Souza D, Harris J, Nho SJ (2016) Clinically meaningful improvements after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in adolescent and young adult patients regardless of gender. J Pediatr Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000852 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.McCarthy J, Barsoum W, Puri L, Lee JA, Murphy S, Cooke P (2009) The role of hip arthroscopy in the elite athlete. Clin Orthop Relat R 406(1):71–74Google Scholar
- 43.Newman JT, Saroki AJ, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ (2016) Return to elite level of play and performance in professional golfers after arthroscopic hip surgery. Orthop J Sports Med 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116643532
- 50.Sansone M, Ahldén M, Jonasson P, Thomeé C, Swärd L, Baranto A, Karlsson J, Thomeé R (2015) Good results after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in top-level athletes. Orthop J Sports Med 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967115569691
- 51.Saw T, Villar R (2004) Footballer’s hip: a report of six cases. Bone Joint J 86(5):655–658Google Scholar