Skip to main content
Log in

Bone grafts used for arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction restore the native glenoid anatomy

  • Shoulder
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Recurrent anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint is a demanding condition, especially in cases of glenoid bone loss. Various treatment options have been described, such as arthroscopic grafting techniques and the Latarjet procedure. In this study, the degree to which an arthroscopically applied iliac crest graft restores the glenoid anatomy was evalutated.

Methods

Nine patients (three women and six men) with an average age of 31 ± 9 years (21–46 years) who were treated with an arthroscopic iliac crest graft technique were included in this study. After a mean follow up of 34 ± 10 months (19–50 months) after the procedure, MRI scans of both shoulders were performed and the glenoid width, Glenoid Index (GI), Pixel Signal intensity (PSI), thickness of the tissue covering the articular aspect of the graft, inclination, version, concavity and balance stability angle were measured.

Results

All scans showed the cultivation of tissue on the graft, which visually resembled the cartilage of the native ipsilateral glenoid. Additionally, reshaping of the graft to repair the glenoid configuration could be observed. Glenoid width (p = 0.022) and GI (p < 0.001) increased significantly through surgery. The tissue examined on the graft showed a significant pixel intensity gap (p = 0.017) but comparable thickness (n.s.) in relation to native cartilage. The remaining parameters did not differ significantly between both shoulders.

Conclusion

In the cohort presented, iliac crest grafts were able to restore the glenoid configuration, and the glenoid was re-shaped to its native contour. Additionally, cartilage-like scar tissue with similar thickness as healthy cartilage was formed on the articular side of the graft. These results suggest that glenoid reconstruction is not only important for prevention of recurrence, but also for restoration of the native glenoid anatomy.

Level of evidence

Level III—retrospective cohort study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed I, Ashton F, Robinson CM (2012) Arthroscopic Bankart repair and capsular shift for recurrent anterior shoulder instability: functional outcomes and identification of risk factors for recurrence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1308–1315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chuang TY, Adams CR, Burkhart SS (2008) Use of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy 24:376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Giacomo G, Itoi E, Burkhart SS (2014) Evolving concept of bipolar bone loss and the Hill-Sachs lesion: from “engaging/non-engaging” lesion to “on-track/off-track” lesion. Arthroscopy 30:90–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dumont GD, Vopat BG, Parada S, Cohn R, Makani A, Sanchez G et al (2016) Traditional versus congruent arc latarjet technique. Effect on surface area for union and bone width surrounding screws. Arthroscopy 33:946–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fortun CM, Wong I, Burns JP (2016) Arthroscopic iliac crest bone grafting to the anterior glenoid. Arthrosc Tech 5:e907–e912

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hohmann E, Tetsworth K (2015) Glenoid version and inclination are risk factors for anterior shoulder dislocation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:1268–1273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang Y, Choi JA (2016) T2 mapping of articular cartilage of the glenohumeral joint at 3.0 T in healthy volunteers: a feasibility study. Skeletal Radiol 45:915–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kraus N, Amphansap T, Gerhardt C, Scheibel M (2014) Arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction using an autologous iliac crest bone grafting technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:1700–1708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsen FA,, Chebli CM, Lippitt SB (2007) Principles for the evaluation and management of shoulder instability. Instr Course Lect 56:23–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McLaughlin RJ, Miniaci A, Jones MH (2015) Bony versus soft tissue reconstruction for anterior shoulder instability: an expected value decision analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 3:2325967115618161

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mizuno N, Denard PJ, Raiss P, Melis B, Walch G (2014) Long-term results of the Latarjet procedure for anterior instability of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:1691–1699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moroder P, Blocher M, Auffarth A, Hoffelner T, Hitzl W, Tauber M et al (2014) Clinical and computed tomography-radiologic outcome after bony glenoid augmentation in recurrent anterior shoulder instability without significant glenoid bone loss. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:420–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nebelung W, Reichwein F, Nebelung S (2016) A simplified arthroscopic bone graft transfer technique in chronic glenoid bone deficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1884–1887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Olivier P, Loeuille D, Watrin A, Walter F, Etienne S, Netter P et al (2001) Structural evaluation of articular cartilage: potential contribution of magnetic resonance techniques used in clinical practice. Arthritis Rheum 44:2285–2295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Outerbridge RE (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43-b:752–757

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pogorzelski J, Beitzel K, Imhoff AB, Braun S (2016) The mini-open Latarjet procedure for treatment of recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder. Oper Orthop Traumatol 28(6):408–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramhamadany E, Modi CS (2016) Current concepts in the management of recurrent anterior gleno-humeral joint instability with bone loss. World J Orthop 7:343–354

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosner B (2011) Fundamentals of biostatistics. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning, Boston, pp 302–303

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schleich C, Bittersohl B, Antoch G, Krauspe R, Zilkens C, Kircher J (2017) Thickness distribution of glenohumeral joint cartilage. Cartilage 8:105–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shin SJ, Jun BJ, Koh YW, McGarry MH, Lee TQ (2016) Estimation of anterior glenoid bone loss area using the ratio of bone defect length to the distance from posterior glenoid rim to the centre of the glenoid. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (Epub ahead of print)

  21. Steffen V, Hertel R (2013) Rim reconstruction with autogenous iliac crest for anterior glenoid deficiency: forty-three instability cases followed for 5–19 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:550–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tauber M, Resch H, Forstner R, Raffl M, Schauer J (2004) Reasons for failure after surgical repair of anterior shoulder instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:279–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mrs Bettina Eßer from the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, St. Vinzenz hospital Düsseldorf, for her technical advice while conducting the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BB conducted the measurements, wrote the manuscript and calculated the statistics. AJV participated in the study’s design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. RG performed the MRI scans. FR participated in the study’s design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. MH helped to draft the manuscript and was involved in data collection. WN conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Bockmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Association of North Rhine (file number 2016324).

Informed consent

All patients gave written informed consent prior to inclusion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bockmann, B., Venjakob, A.J., Gebing, R. et al. Bone grafts used for arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction restore the native glenoid anatomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26, 299–305 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4757-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4757-6

Keywords

Navigation