Advertisement

Posterior cruciate ligament is twisted and flat structure: new prospective on anatomical morphology

  • Tomohiro KatoEmail author
  • Robert Śmigielski
  • Yunshen Ge
  • Urszula Zdanowicz
  • Bogdan Ciszek
  • Mitsuo Ochi
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

This cadaveric study aimed to elucidate PCL morphology by observing the anatomical relationship with other structures and the fibre layers of the PCL in cross section for remnant preserving PCL reconstruction.

Methods

Seventeen fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were studied, using the clock-face method to analyse the anatomical relationship between the PCL and Humphrey’s ligament. The width and thickness of the PCL, Humphrey’s and Wrisberg’s ligaments were measured. The PCL was cut sharply perpendicular to the tibia shaft, and the fibre layers were observed in cross section.

Results

The PCL was located between 12 and 4 o’clock in the right knee (8 and 12 o’clock in the left), while Humphrey’s ligament was located between 2 and 4 o’clock in the right knee (8 and 10 o’clock in the left). Humphrey’s ligament at femoral insertion, midsubstance and lateral meniscus insertion averaged 8.7 ± 2.3, 5.9 ± 2.1 and 6.1 ± 2.0 mm, respectively, while the thickness at each level averaged 2.0 ± 1.2, 1.6 ± 0.6 and 1.9 ± 0.6 mm. The width of the PCL at midsubstance and at medial meniscus level averaged 13.3 ± 2.0 and 11.0 ± 1.6 mm, respectively, while the thickness of the PCL averaged 5.4 ± 0.8 and 5.5 ± 1.4 mm. In cross section, multiple, interconnected layers were observed which could not be divided. The main layers at each level were aligned from the posterolateral to the anteromedial aspect and formed a C-shape at the medial meniscus level.

Conclusion

The PCL at midsubstance is flat. PCL appears as a twisted ribbon composed of many small fibres without clearly separate bundles. When remnant preserving PCL reconstruction is performed, it is necessary to take account of not only PCL morphology but also the ligaments of Humphrey and Wrisberg. These findings may affect the PCL footprint and the graft shape in the future remnant preserving PCL reconstruction.

Keywords

PCL Humphrey’s ligament Wrisberg’s ligament Fresh-frozen cadaver Morphology Remnant preserving PCL reconstruction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank Maciej Śmiarowski (maciej.smiarowski@gmail.com) for taking all photographs.

Authors’ contributions

TK performed the study design, dissections, measurements, interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript. RS performed the study concept, dissections, interpretation of the data and critical comments on drafting of the manuscript. YG performed the dissections. UZ interpreted the data. BC instructed the dissections. MO was involved in interpretation of data and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

There was no outside funding or grants received that assisted in this study.

Ethical approval

This study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards concerning investigations on human cadavers in Poland.

Informed consent

For this type of article informed consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Ishikawa M, Shinomiya R (2007) Temporal change of joint position sense after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using multi-stranded hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(1):2–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahn JH, Chung YS, Oh I (2003) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the posterior trans-septal portal. Arthroscopy 19(1):101–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahn JH, Lee SH (2014) Anatomic graft passage in remnant-preserving posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech 3(5):e579–e582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahn JH, Nha KW, Kim YC, Lim HC, Nam HW, Wang JH (2006) Arthroscopic femoral tensioning and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in chronic posterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthroscopy 22(3):e341–e344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amis AA, Bull AM, Gupte CM, Hijazi I, Race A, Robinson JR (2003) Biomechanics of the PCL and related structures: posterolateral, posteromedial and meniscofemoral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11(5):271–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amis AA, Gupte CM, Bull AM, Edwards A (2006) Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and the meniscofemoral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(3):257–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anderson CJ, Ziegler CG, Wijdicks CA, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF (2012) Arthroscopically pertinent anatomy of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(21):1936–1945CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Apple M, Gradinger R (1989) Die Architektur des Kreuzbandaufbaus. Praktische Sport-Traumatologie und Sportmedizin 1:12–16Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chwaluk A, Ciszek B (2009) Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament. Folia Morphologica (Warsz) 68(1):8–12Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clancy WG Jr, Shelbourne KD, Zoellner GB, Keene JS, Reider B, Rosenberg TD (1983) Treatment of knee joint instability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Report of a new procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(3):310–322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Covey CD, Sapega AA (1993) Injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(9):1376–1386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Covey DC, Sapega AA, Marshall RC (2004) The effects of varied joint motion and loading conditions on posterior cruciate ligament fiber length behavior. Am J Sports Med 32(8):1866–1872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Covey DC, Sapega AA, Riffenburgh RH (2008) The effects of sequential sectioning of defined posterior cruciate ligament fiber regions on translational knee motion. Am J Sports Med 36(3):480–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Covey DC, Sapega AA, Sherman GM (1996) Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Anatomic and biomechanical considerations. Am J Sports Med 24(6):740–746CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA (2007) The attachments of the fiber bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23(3):284–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eguchi A, Adachi N, Nakamae A, Usman MA, Deie M, Ochi M (2014) Proprioceptive function after isolated single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation for chronic posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(3):303–308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 106:216–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gupte CM, Bull AM, Atkinson HD, Thomas RD, Strachan RK, Amis AA (2006) Arthroscopic appearances of the meniscofemoral ligaments: introducing the “meniscal tug test”. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:1259–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gupte CM, Bull AM, Thomas RD, Amis AA (2003) The meniscofemoral ligaments: secondary restraints to the posterior drawer. Analysis of anteroposterior and rotary laxity in the intact and posterior-cruciate-deficient knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(5):765–773PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jung HJ, Kim JH, Lee HJ, Koo S, Chang SH, Jung YB, Lee SH (2013) The isometry of two different paths for remnant-preserving posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:1029–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Keller PM, Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR, Rettig AC (1993) Nonoperatively treated isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 21(1):132–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim SJ, Kim TE, Jo SB, Kung YP (2009) Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(11):2543–2549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim YM, Lee CA, Matava MJ (2011) Clinical results of arthroscopic single-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 39(2):425–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kusayama T, Harner CD, Carlin GJ, Xerogeanes JW, Smith BA (1994) Anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of human meniscofemoral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2(4):234–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    LaPrade CM, Civitarese DM, Rasmussen MT, LaPrade RF (2015) Emerging updates on the posterior cruciate ligament: a review of the current literature. Am J Sports Med 43(12):3077–3092CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee DW, Jang HW, Lee YS, Oh SJ, Kim JY, Song HE, Kim JG (2014) Clinical, functional, and morphological evaluations of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 42(8):1822–1831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lopes OV Jr, Ferretti M, Shen W, Ekdahl M, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2008) Topography of the femoral attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(2):249–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Makris CA, Georgoulis AD, Papageorgiou CD, Moebius UG, Soucacos PN (2000) Posterior cruciate ligament architecture: evaluation under microsurgical dissection. Arthroscopy 16(6):627–632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mejia EA, Noyes FR, Grood ES (2002) Posterior cruciate ligament femoral insertion site characteristics. Importance for reconstructive procedures. Am J Sports Med 30(5):643–651CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Papannagari R, DeFrate LE, Nha KW, Moses JM, Moussa M, Gill TJ, Li G (2007) Function of posterior cruciate ligament bundles during in vivo knee flexion. Am J Sports Med 35(9):1507–1512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Poynton A, Moran CJ, Moran R, O’Brien M (2011) The meniscofemoral ligaments influence lateral meniscal motion at the human knee joint. Arthroscopy 27(3):365–371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Safran MR, Allen AA, Lephart SM, Borsa PA, Fu FH, Harner CD (1999) Proprioception in the posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7(5):310–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shelbourne KD, Clark M, Gray T (2013) Minimum 10-year follow-up of patients after an acute, isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury treated nonoperatively. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1526–1533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shelbourne KD, Jennings RW, Vahey TN (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: assessment of healing. Am J Knee Surg 12(4):209–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shelbourne KD, Muthukaruppan Y (2005) Subjective results of nonoperatively treated, acute, isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Arthroscopy 21(4):457–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shino K, Horibe S, Nakata K, Maeda A, Hamada M, Nakamura N (1995) Conservative treatment of isolated injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(6):895–900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Siebold R, Schuhmacher P, Fernadez F, Smigielski R, Fink C, Brehmer A, Kirsch J (2014) Flat midsubstance of the anterior cruciate ligament with tibial “C”-shaped insertion site. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(11):3136–3142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Smigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwiega M, Ciszek B, Ciszkowska-Lyson B, Siebold R (2014) Ribbon like appearance of the midsubstance fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament close to its femoral insertion site: a cadaveric study including 111 knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(11):3143–3150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Spiridonov SI, Slinkard NJ, LaPrade RF (2011) Isolated and combined grade-III posterior cruciate ligament tears treated with double-bundle reconstruction with use of endoscopically placed femoral tunnels and grafts: operative technique and clinical outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(19):1773–1780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Takahashi M, Matsubara T, Doi M, Suzuki D, Nagano A (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(11):1055–1059CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Van Dommelen BA, Fowler PJ (1989) Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament. A review. Am J Sports Med 17(1):24–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomohiro Kato
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert Śmigielski
    • 2
  • Yunshen Ge
    • 3
  • Urszula Zdanowicz
    • 2
  • Bogdan Ciszek
    • 4
  • Mitsuo Ochi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.Orthopaedic and Sports Traumatology DepartmentCarolina Medical CenterWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Department of Sports MedicineHuashan HospitalShanghaiChina
  4. 4.Department of Descriptive and Clinical AnatomyMedical University of WarsawWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations