Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 113–124 | Cite as

Improved outcomes with arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review

  • J. Christoph Katthagen
  • Gabriella Bucci
  • Gilbert Moatshe
  • Dimitri S. Tahal
  • Peter J. MillettEmail author
Shoulder

Abstract

Purpose

The optimum treatment strategy for the surgical management of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCT) is evolving. In this study, two research questions were sought to be answered: “Does the repair technique for PTRCTs involving >50% of the tendon thickness have an effect on structural and functional outcomes of arthroscopic repair?” and “Is there a difference in outcomes of arthroscopically treated articular- and bursal-sided PTRCTs?”.

Methods

A systematic review according to the PRISMA statement was conducted to identify all literature published reporting on outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of PTRCTs classified with the Ellman classification with minimum 2-year follow-up. Prospective randomized trials were eligible for quantitative synthesis. A total of 19 studies, published between 1999 and 2015, met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. Two studies reporting outcomes of articular-sided PTRCTs with prospective randomized study design were included in quantitative synthesis calculations.

Results

Arthroscopic repair of PTRCTs >50% thickness results in significant pain relief and good to excellent functional outcomes. When in situ repair was compared with repair of the tendon after completion to full-thickness RCT, there were no significant differences in functional or structural outcomes or complication rates. The best treatment method for low-grade PTRCTs remains unclear.

Conclusions

The repair technique (in situ repair versus repair of the tendon after completion to full-thickness RCT) did not significantly affect the outcomes for arthroscopic repair of PTRCTs >50% thickness. The current literature contains evidence for inferior outcomes and higher failure rates after arthroscopic debridement of bursal-sided compared to articular-sided PTRCTs, and some evidence suggests that repair of lower-grade bursal-sided tears may be beneficial over debridement.

Level of evidence

IV.

Keywords

Partial-thickness Rotator cuff tear Debridement Repair Arthroscopy Transtendon Conversion to full-thickness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Grant J. Dornan, MSc for his assistance with statistical analysis.

Authors contribution

JCK conceived the study and design, acquired and interpreted data, drafted the manuscript, has given final approval and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work. GB conceived the study and design, acquired and interpreted data, helped draft the manuscript, has given final approval and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work. GM acquired and interpreted data, helped draft the manuscript, has given final approval and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work. DST acquired and interpreted data, helped draft and revise the manuscript, has given final approval and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work. PJM conceived the study and design, revised it critically, has given final approval and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Other than GM and PJM none of the other authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research study was not funded directly by any organization but was supported by Steadman Philippon Research Institute and their corporate sponsors.

Ethical approval

This was a systematic review of published literature, and and IRB approval was not required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not applicable to this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Chang KV, Hung CY, Han DS, Chen WS, Wang TG, Chien KL (2015) Early versus delayed passive range of motion exercise for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med 43:1265–1273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chung SW, Kim JY, Yoon JP, Lyu SH, Rhee SM, Oh SB (2015) Arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness and small full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 43:588–596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Connor PM, Banks DM, Tyson AB, Coumas JS, D’Alessandro DF (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of the asymptomatic shoulder of overhead athletes: a 5-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 31:724–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cordasco FA, Backer M, Craig EV, Klein D, Warren RF (2002) The partial-thickness rotator cuff tear: is acromioplasty without repair sufficient? Am J Sports Med 30:257–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Curtis AS, Burbank KM, Tierney JJ, Scheller AD, Curran AR (2006) The insertional footprint of the rotator cuff: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 22:603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deutsch A (2007) Arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dugas JR, Campbell DA, Warren RF, Robie BH, Millett PJ (2002) Anatomy and dimensions of rotator cuff insertions. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11:498–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duralde XA, McClelland WB Jr (2012) The clinical results of arthroscopic transtendinous repair of grade III partial articular-sided supraspinatus tendon tears. Arthroscopy 28:160–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ellman H (1990) Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:64–74Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ellman H, Kay SP (1991) Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for chronic impingement. Two- to five-year results. J Bone Jt Surg Br 73:395–398Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Franceschi F, Papalia R, Del Buono A, Vasta S, Costa V, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2013) Articular-sided rotator cuff tears: which is the best repair? a three-year prospective randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop 37:1487–1493CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fukuda H, Hamada K, Nakajima T, Tomonaga A (1994) Pathology and pathogenesis of the intratendinous tearing of the rotator cuff viewed from en bloc histologic sections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:60–67Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fukuda H, Hamada K, Nakajima T, Yamada N, Tomonaga A, Goto M (1996) Partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. A clinicopathological review based on 66 surgically verified cases. Int Orthop 20:257–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harris JD, Quatman CE, Manring MM, Siston RA, Flanigan DC (2014) How to write a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 42:2761–2768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kamath G, Galatz LM, Keener JD, Teefey S, Middleton W, Yamaguchi K (2009) Tendon integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic repair of high-grade partial-thickness supraspinatus tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91:1055–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kartus J, Kartus C, Rostgård-Christensen L, Sernert N, Read J, Perko M (2006) Long-term clinical and ultrasound evaluation after arthroscopic acromioplasty in patients with partial rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 22:44–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim KC, Shin HD, Cha SM, Park JY (2014) Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic conversion to a full-thickness rotator cuff tear: articular- versus bursal-side partial tears. Am J Sports Med 42:451–456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koh KH, Shon MS, Lim TK, Yoo JC (2011) Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results of arthroscopic full-layer repair of bursal-side partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 39:1660–1667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lo IK, Burkhart SS (2004) Transtendon arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness, articular surface tears of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy 20:214–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lumsdaine W, Smith A, Walker RG, Benz D, Mohammed KD, Stewart F (2015) Morphology of the humeral insertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons: application to rotator cuff repair. Clin Anat 28:767–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mall NA, Kim HM, Keener JD, Steger-May K, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Stobbs G, Yamaguchi K (2010) Symptomatic progression of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective study of clinical and sonographic variables. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92:2623–2633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maman E, Harris C, White L, Tomlinson G, Shashank M, Boyton E (2009) Outcome of nonoperative treatment of symptomatic rotator cuff tears monitored by magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91:1898–1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mascarenhas R, Chalmers PN, Sayegh ET, Bhandari M, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Romeo AA (2014) Is double-row rotator cuff repair clinically superior to single-row rotator cuff repair: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analysis. Arthroscopy 30:1156–1165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matthewson G, Beach CJ, Nelson AA, Woodmass JM, Ono Y, Boorman RS, Lo IK, Thornton GM (2015) Partial thickness rotator cuff tears: current concepts. Adv Orthop 2015:458786CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Millett PJ, Warth RJ, Dornan GJ, Lee TJ, Spiegl UJ (2014) Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized clinical trials. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:586–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Modi CS, Smith CD, Drew SJ (2012) Partial-thickness articular surface rotator cuff tears in patients over the age of 35: etiology and intra-articular associations. Int J Shoulder Surg 6:15–18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 8:336–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moor BK, Bouaicha S, Rothenfluh DA, Sukthankar A, Gerber C (2013) Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint? J Bone Jt Surg Br 95-B:935–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Olsewski JM, Depew AD (1994) Arthroscopic subacromial decompression and rotator cuff debridement for stage II and stage III impingement. Arthroscopy 10:61–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Park JY, Chung KT, Yoo MJ (2004) A serial comparison of arthroscopic repairs for partial- and full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 20:705–711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Park JY, Yoo MJ, Kim MH (2003) Comparison of surgical outcome between bursal and articular partial thickness rotator cuff tears. Orthopedics 26:387–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Park SE, Panchal K, Jeong JJ, Kim YY, Kim JH, Lee JY, Ji JH (2015) Intratendinous rotator cuff tears: prevalence and clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopically confirmed intratendinous tears at midterm follow-up. Am J Sports Med 43:415–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peters KS, McCallum S, Briggs L, Murrell GA (2012) A comparison of outcomes after arthroscopic repair of partial versus small or medium-sized full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94:1078–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Porat S, Nottage WM, Fouse MN (2008) Repair of partial thickness rotator cuff tears: a retrospective review with minimum two-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg 17:729–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/
  36. 36.
    Ruotolo C, Fow JE, Nottage WM (2004) The supraspinatus footprint: an anatomic study of the supraspinatus insertion. Arthroscopy 20:246–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sambandam SN, Khanna V, Gul A, Mounasamy V (2015) Rotator cuff tears: an evidence based approach. World J Orthop 6:902–918CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shin SJ (2012) A comparison of 2 repair techniques for partial-thickness articular-sided rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 28:25–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shin SJ, Kook SH, Rao N, Seo MJ (2015) Clinical outcomes of modified mason-allen single-row repair for bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: comparison with the double-row suture-bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 43:1976–1982CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang Y, Lu L, Lu Z, Xiao L, Kang Y, Wang Z (2015) Arthroscopic transtendinous repair of articular-sided pasta (partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion) injury. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:101–107PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Weber SC (1999) Arthroscopic debridement and acromioplasty versus mini-open repair in the treatment of significant partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 15:126–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Woods TC, Carroll MJ, Nelson AA, More KD, Berdusco R, Sohmer S, Boorman RS, Lo IK (2014) Transtendon rotator-cuff repair of partial-thickness articular surface tears can lead to medial rotator-cuff failure. Open Access J Sports Med 5:151–157PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Xiao J, Cui GQ (2015) Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results of arthroscopic repair of intratendinous partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Chin Med J (Engl) 128:1496–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Xiao J, Cui G (2015) Clinical and structural results of arthroscopic repair of bursal-side partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24:e41–e46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yamanaka K, Matsumoto T (1994) The joint side tear of the rotator cuff. A followup study by arthrography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:68–73Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Christoph Katthagen
    • 1
    • 6
  • Gabriella Bucci
    • 2
  • Gilbert Moatshe
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Dimitri S. Tahal
    • 1
  • Peter J. Millett
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Center for Outcomes-based Orthopaedic ResearchSteadman Philippon Research InstituteVailUSA
  2. 2.Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Hospital de MataróBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryOslo University Hospital and University of OsloOsloNorway
  4. 4.OSTRCThe Norwegian School of Sports SciencesOsloNorway
  5. 5.The Steadman ClinicVailUSA
  6. 6.Department for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive SurgeryUniversity Hospital MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations