Comparison of the efficiency of an extra-articular absorber system and high tibial osteotomy for unloading the medial knee compartment: an in vitro study
- 539 Downloads
The unloading effect of an extra-articular absorber system on the knee joint medial compartment was compared with high tibial osteotomy (HTO) under physiological conditions in vitro.
Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were used to test isokinetic flexion–extension motions under physiological loading using a biomechanical knee simulator. Tibiofemoral area contact and peak contact pressures were measured using pressure-sensitive film in the untreated medial compartment. Pressures were measured after KineSpring System implantation and HTO (5° and 10° correction angles) performed with an angular-stable internal fixator (Tomofix).
Implantation of the unloading device resulted in significantly decreased medial compartment area contact pressure (Δ0.02 ± 0.01 MPa, p = 0.001) and peak contact pressure (Δ0.3 ± 0.1 MPa, p = 0.001) compared with the first test cycle results in the untreated knee. HTO significantly decreased the pressure (p = 0.001). Compared with the first test cycle, HTO (5° correction angle) decreased the mean contact pressure by Δ0.03 ± 0.01 MPa and peak contact pressure by Δ0.3 ± 0.01 MPa. With a 10° correction angle, HTO decreased contact pressure by Δ0.04 ± 0.02 MPa and peak contact pressure by Δ0.4 ± 0.1 MPa compared with that at the 5° correction angle.
Implantation of an extra-capsular unloading device resulted in a significant unloading effect on the medial compartment comparable to that achieved with HTO at 5° and 10° correction angles. Thus, implantation of an extra-articular, extra-capsular absorber could become the method of choice when treating patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis that cannot be adequately treated by HTO because of their straight-leg axis.
KeywordsUnicompartmental osteoarthritis Unloading Osteotomy Medial compartment
Funding was provided by Müller-Fahnenberg Stiftung.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any conflict of interest.
The study was funded by the Müller-Fahnenberg Study of Freiburg University.
The ethics committee of Hannover University approved this study (ID 3083-2016).
- 1.Agneskirchner JD, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C et al (2004) Effect of high tibial flexion osteotomy on cartilage pressure and joint kinematics: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric knees. Winner of the AGA-DonJoy Award 2004. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(9):575–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Bode G, Schmal H, Pestka JM et al (2013) A non-randomized controlled clinical trial on autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in cartilage defects of the medial femoral condyle with or without high tibial osteotomy in patients with varus deformity of less than 5 degrees. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(1):43–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Brandt KD, Dieppe P, Radin E (2009) Etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Med Clin North Am 93(1):1–24, xvGoogle Scholar
- 10.Clifford AG, Gabriel SM, O’Connell M et al (2013) The KineSpring((R)) Knee Implant System: an implantable joint-unloading prosthesis for treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis. Med Devices 6:69–76Google Scholar
- 20.Niemeyer P, Schmal H, Hauschild O et al (2010) Open-wedge osteotomy using an internal plate fixator in patients with medial-compartment gonarthritis and varus malalignment: 3-year results with regard to preoperative arthroscopic and radiographic findings. Arthroscopy 26(12):1607–1616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Stiebel M, Miller LE, Block JE (2014) Post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis in the young patient: therapeutic dilemmas and emerging technologies Open Access. J Sports Med 5:73–79Google Scholar
- 27.Ziegler R, Goebel L, Seidel R et al (2015) Effect of open wedge high tibial osteotomy on the lateral tibiofemoral compartment in sheep. Part III: analysis of the microstructure of the subchondral bone and correlations with the articular cartilage and meniscus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(9):2704–2714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar