Skip to main content
Log in

The prevalence of proximal hamstring pathology on MRI in the asymptomatic population

  • Hip
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Injury to the proximal hamstring complex (PHC) is becoming more frequently diagnosed. Patients attending our tertiary referral centre demonstrated ‘pathological changes’ in the unaffected normal contralateral PHC on MRI. The prevalence of PHC pathology, however, has not been previously documented in the literature in asymptomatic subjects. It is the hypothesis of this study that the natural history of asymptomatic pathological change on MRI in the PHC is not clear. The aim is to quantify the natural history of PHC degeneration.

Method

Two hundred and fifty-three consecutive patients with an asymptomatic PHC were reviewed retrospectively between 2009 and 2010. The PHC was assessed in multiple MRI planes by a specialist musculoskeletal consultant radiologist.

Results

Five hundred and six proximal hamstrings complexes were reviewed. Eighty-nine patients (35 %) were radiological normal both sides, median age 51 years (range 13–88). Thirty-four patients (13 %) had unilateral pathology, median age 55 years (range 25–89). Of these, 3 patients (1 %) had presence of a complete tear, median age 81 years (range 72–87). Sixteen patients (7 %) had tendinosis, median age 60 years (range 37–78). Fifteen patients (6 %) had a unilateral partial tear, median age 57 years (range 35–78). One hundred and thirty patients (52 %) had bilateral pathology, median age 65 years (range 25–89). Fifty-three patients (21 %) had the presence of bilateral tendinopathy alone, median age 56 years (range 25–89). Twenty-seven patients (11 %) had a partial tear on one side and tendinosis on the other, median age 68 years (range 38–89). Thirty-nine patients (15 %) had evidence of bilateral partial tears, median age 63 years (range 36–89), with 52 % demonstrating a torn conjoined and semi-membranosus tendon. The remaining 48 % had either an isolated tear of the conjoined or the semi-membranosus (the more commonly injured tendon 74 % of the time). Four patients (2 %) had bilateral complete ruptures with a median age of 68 years (range 59–78). Six patients (2 %) had a complete tear on one side and a partial tear on the other, median age 68 years (range 34–83). One patient had a complete tear on one side and tendinosis on the other, age 81 years.

Conclusion

There is a higher prevalence of pathology in the asymptomatic population, 15 % have bilateral partial tears, and 2 % have bilateral complete tears. The semi-membranosus being the most affected, this may help clinically stratify the need for surgical intervention.

Level of evidence

I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aldridge SE, Heilpern GN, Carmichael JR, Sprowson AP, Wood DG (2012) Incomplete avulsion of the proximal insertion of the hamstring: outcome two years following surgical repair. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(5):660–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Askling CM, Tengvar M, Saartok T, Thorstensson A (2007) Acute first-time hamstring strains during high-speed running: a longitudinal study including clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Am J Sports Med 35(2):197–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett AJ, Negus JJ, Barton T, Wood DG (2015) Reattachment of the proximal hamstring origin: outcome in patients with partial and complete tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(7):2130–2135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Battermann N, Appell HJ, Dargel J, Koebke J (2011) An anatomical study of the proximal hamstring muscle complex to elucidate muscle strains in this region. Int J Sports Med 32(3):211–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bierry G, Simeone FJ, Borg-Stein JP, Clavert P, Palmer WE (2014) Sacrotuberous ligament: relationship to normal, torn, and retracted hamstring tendons on MR images. Radiology 271(1):162–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blasier RB, Morawa LG (1990) Complete rupture of the hamstring origin from a water skiing injury. Am J Sports Med 18(4):435–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks JHM, Fuller CW, Kemp SPT, Reddin DB (2006) Incidence, risk, and prevention of hamstring muscle injuries in professional rugby union. Am J Sports Med 34(8):1297–1306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen SB, Bradley JP (2007) Acute proximal hamstring rupture. J Am Acad Ortho Surg 15(6):350–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cross M, Vandersluis R, Wood D, Banff M (1998) Surgical repair of chronic complete hamstring rupture in the adult patient. Am J Sports Med 26(6):785–788

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeSmet AA, Blankenbaker DG, Alsheik NH, Lindstrom MJ (2012) MRI appearance of the proximal hamstring tendons in patients with and without symptomatic proximal hamstring tendinopathy. Am J Roentgenol 198(2):418–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishikawa K, Kai K, Mizuta H (1988) Avulsion of the hamstring muscles from the ischial tuberosity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:153–155

    Google Scholar 

  12. Linklater JM, Hamilton B, Carmichael J, Orchard J, Wood DG (2010) Hamstring injuries: anatomy, imaging, and intervention. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 14(2):131–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller SL, Gill J, Webb GR (2007) The proximal origin of the hamstrings and surrounding anatomy encountered during repair. A cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(1):44–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Philippon MJ, Ferro FP, Campbell KJ, Michalski MP, Goldsmith MT, Devitt BM, Wijdicks CA, LaPrade RF (2015) A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the attachment sites of the proximal hamstrings. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(9):2554–2561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reilly P, Macleod I, Macfarlane R, Windley J, Emery RJH (2006) Deadmen and radiologists don’t lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff prevalence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88(2):116–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sallay PI, Friedman RL, Coogan PG, Garrett WE (1996) Hamstring muscle injuries among water skiers functional outcome and prevention. Am J Sports Med 24(2):130–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schneider-Kolsky ME, Hoving JL, Warren P, Connel DA (2006) A comparison between clinical assessment and magnetic resonance imaging of acute hamstring injuries. Am J Sports Med 34(6):1008–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zissen MH, Wallace G, Stevens KJ, Fredericson M, Beaulieu CF (2010) High hamstring tendinopathy: MRI and ultrasound imaging and therapeutic efficacy of percutaneous corticosteroid injection. Am J Roentgenol 195(4):993–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thompson, S.M., Fung, S. & Wood, D.G. The prevalence of proximal hamstring pathology on MRI in the asymptomatic population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 108–111 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4253-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4253-4

Keywords

Navigation