Skip to main content

Saphenous nerve injury during hamstring tendons harvest: Does the incision matter? A systematic review

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy volume 25, pages 3140–3145 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve injury is a common complication following hamstring graft harvest during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The direction of skin incision performed at proximal tibial metaphysis may affect the rate of iatrogenic nerve damage. Aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate evidence that would substantiate the adoption of one incision over another for hamstring graft harvesting.

Methods

The available literature was systematically screened searching studies dealing with iatrogenic injury to the saphenous nerve after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. A search was performed using the keywords “Saphenous” and “Infrapatellar branch” in combination with “Anterior cruciate ligament”, “arthroscopy” and “hamstrings”, supplying no limits regard the publication year. Coleman methodological score was performed in all the retained articles.

Results

Five articles matched the inclusion criteria. There were two randomized controlled trials, one prospective comparative study and two retrospective comparative series. Poor methodological quality was found overall. A vertical incision was found to significantly affect the presence of hypoesthesia and the extent of the area of sensory loss in three articles; no difference was registered in one, and a trend towards a lower rate of iatrogenic nerve damage using an oblique incision was found in the remaining one, without any statistical significance.

Conclusion

Although the low methodological quality of the analysed studies does not permit to draw definitive conclusions, the anatomical course of the nerve along with the results obtained in the available studies seems to suggest lower rate of neurological impairment adopting an oblique incision. This kind of incision may therefore be preferred in the routine clinical practice.

Level of evidence

Systematic review, Level II.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Giron F, Simeone AJ, Zaccherotti G (1997) Arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the central third patellar tendon. A 5-8-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:138–144

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arthornthurasook A, Gaew-Im K (1990) The sartorial nerve: its relationship to the medial aspect of the knee. Am J Sports Med 18:41–42

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boon JM, Van Wyk MJ, Jordaan D (2004) A safe area and angle for harvesting autogenous tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Surg Radiol Anat 26:167–171

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buda R, Ruffilli A, Vannini F, Parma A, Giannini S (2013) Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using distally inserted doubled hamstrings tendons. Orthopedics 36:449–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD (2000) Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:2–11

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Figueroa D, Calvo R, Vaisman A, Campero M, Moraga C (2008) Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve in ACL reconstruction with the hamstrings technique: clinical and electrophysiological study. Knee 15:360–363

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Figueroa D, Calvo R, Vaisman A, Carrasco MA, Moraga C, Delgado I (2007) Knee chondral lesions: incidence and correlation between arthroscopic and magnetic resonance findings. Arthroscopy 23:312–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Franz W, Baumann A (2016) Minimally invasive semitendinosus tendon harvesting from the popliteal fossa versus conventional hamstring tendon harvesting for ACL reconstruction: A prospective, randomised controlled trial in 100 patients. The Knee Epub ahead of print

  9. Hunter LY, Louis DS, Ricciardi JR, O’Connor GA (1979) The saphenous nerve: its course and importance in medial arthrotomy. Am J Sports Med 7:227–230

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jameson S, Emmerson K (2007) Altered sensation over the lower leg following hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transverse femoral fixation. Knee 14:314–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kartus J, Movin T, Karlsson J (2001) Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts. Arthroscopy 17:971–980

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kjaergaard J, Faunø LZ, Faunø P (2008) Sensibility loss after ACL reconstruction with hamstring graft. Int J Sports Med 29:507–511

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luo H, Yu J, Ao Y, Yu C, Peng L-B, Lin C, Zhang J, Fu X (2007) Relationship between different skin incisions and the injury of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Chin Med J (Engl) 120:1127–1130

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mirzatolooei F, Pisoodeh K (2012) Impact of exploration of sensory branches of saphenous nerve in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery. Arch Iran Med 15:219–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mochizuki T, Akita K, Muneta T, Sato T (2003) Anatomical bases for minimizing sensory disturbance after arthroscopically-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using medial hamstring tendons. Surg Radiol Anat 25:192–199

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Papastergiou SG, Voulgaropoulos H, Mikalef P, Ziogas E, Pappis G, Giannakopoulos I (2006) Injuries to the infrapatellar branch(es) of the saphenous nerve in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with four-strand hamstring tendon autograft: vertical versus horizontal incision for harvest. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:789–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruffilli A, Traina F, Evangelisti G, Borghi R, Perna F, Faldini C (2015) Preservation of hamstring tibial insertion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of the current literature. Musculoskelet Surg 99:87–92

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sabat D, Kumar V (2013) Nerve injury during hamstring graft harvest: a prospective comparative study of three different incisions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2089–2095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanders B, Rolf R, McClelland W, Xerogeanes J (2007) Prevalence of saphenous nerve injury after autogenous hamstring harvest: an anatomic and clinical study of sartorial branch injury. Arthroscopy 23:956–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Spicer DD, Blagg SE, Unwin AJ, Allum RL (2000) Anterior knee symptoms after four-strand hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:286–289

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tavakoli Darestani R, Bagherian Lemraski MM, Hosseinpour M, Kamrani-Rad A (2013) Electrophysiological assessment of injury to the infra-patellar branch(es) of the saphenous nerve during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using medial hamstring auto-grafts: vertical versus oblique harvest site incisions. Arch Trauma Res 2:118–123

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Walshaw T, Karuppiah SV, Stewart I (2015) The course and distribution of the infra patellar nerve in relation to ACL reconstruction. Knee 22:384–388

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Warren LF, Marshall JL (1979) The supporting structures and layers on the medial side of the knee: an anatomical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:56–62

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Ohkoshi Y, Tanabe Y, Kaneda K (1995) Graft site morbidity with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med 23:706–714

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Rizzoli Sicilia Department, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, SS 113, Km 246, 90011, Bagheria, PA, Italy

    A. Ruffilli, M. De Fine, F. Traina, F. Pilla & C. Faldini

  2. Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University Hospital “G.Martino”, Messina, Italy

    D. Fenga

Authors
  1. A. Ruffilli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. De Fine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Traina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Pilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. Fenga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. Faldini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. De Fine.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruffilli, A., De Fine, M., Traina, F. et al. Saphenous nerve injury during hamstring tendons harvest: Does the incision matter? A systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 3140–3145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4217-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4217-8

Keywords

  • Saphenous nerve injury
  • Hamstring tendons harvest
  • Complications
  • ACL reconstruction