Advertisement

No negative effect on patient-reported outcome of concomitant cartilage lesions 5–9 years after ACL reconstruction

  • Svend Ulstein
  • Karin Bredland
  • Asbjørn Årøen
  • Lars Engebretsen
  • Jan Harald Røtterud
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

To compare patient-reported outcome 5–9 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients with and without a concomitant full-thickness [International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 3–4] cartilage lesion.

Methods

This is a prospective follow-up of a cohort of 89 patients that were identified in the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry and included in the current study in 2007, consisting of 30 primary ACL-reconstructed patients with a concomitant, isolated full-thickness cartilage lesion (ICRS grade 3 and 4) and 59 matched controls without cartilage lesions (ICRS grade 1–4). At a median follow-up of 6.3 years (range 4.9–9.1) after ACL reconstruction, 74 (84 %) patients completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), which was used as the main outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included radiographic evaluation according to the Kellgren–Lawrence criteria of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Results

At follow-up, 5–9 years after ACL reconstruction, no statistically significant differences in KOOS were detected between patients with a concomitant full-thickness cartilage lesion and patients without concomitant cartilage lesions. Radiographic knee OA of the affected knee, defined as Kellgren and Lawrence ≥2, was significantly more frequent in subjects without a concomitant cartilage lesion (p = 0.016).

Conclusion

ACL reconstruction performed in patients with an isolated concomitant full-thickness cartilage lesion restored patient-reported knee function to the same level as ACL reconstruction performed in patients without concomitant cartilage lesions, 5–9 years after surgery. This should be considered in the preoperative information given to patients with such combined injuries, in terms of the expected outcome after ACL reconstruction and in the counselling and decision-making on the subject of surgical treatment of the concomitant cartilage lesion.

Level of evidence

Prognostic; prospective cohort study, Level I.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament Reconstruction Cartilage lesion Outcome KOOS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the National Knee Ligament Registry in Norway for providing the data for the current study. We also thank the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center for support while conducting the study. Grant research support from Akershus University Hospital is appreciated for the current study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Bekkers JE, de Windt TS, Raijmakers NJ, Dhert WJ, Saris DB (2009) Validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions. Osteoarthr Cartil 17(11):1434–1439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey WG, Kocher MS, Steadman JR (2009) The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med 37(5):890–897CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brittberg M, Peterson L (1998) Introduction of an articular cartilage classification. ICRS Newsl 1:5–8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roos EM (2011) Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63(Suppl 11):S208–S228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cox CL, Huston LJ, Dunn WR, Reinke EK, Nwosu SK, Parker RD, Wright RW, Kaeding CC, Marx RG, Amendola A, McCarty EC, Spindler KP (2014) Are articular cartilage lesions and meniscus tears predictive of IKDC, KOOS, and Marx activity level outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A 6-year multicenter cohort study. Am J Sports Med 42(5):1058–1067CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drogset JO, Grontvedt T (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without a ligament augmentation device: results at 8-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 30(6):851–856PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engelhart L, Nelson L, Lewis S, Mordin M, Demuro-Mercon C, Uddin S, McLeod L, Cole B, Farr J (2012) Validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales for patients with articular cartilage lesions of the knee. Am J Sports Med 40(10):2264–2272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engen CN, Engebretsen L, Aroen A (2010) Knee cartilage defect patients enrolled in randomized controlled trials are not representative of patients in orthopedic practice. Cartilage 1(4):312–319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Filardo G, de Caro F, Andriolo L, Kon E, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M (2016) Do cartilage lesions affect the clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Epub ahead of print] Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Granan LP, Bahr R, Steindal K, Furnes O, Engebretsen L (2008) Development of a national cruciate ligament surgery registry: the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med 36(2):308–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Granan LP, Forssblad M, Lind M, Engebretsen L (2009) The Scandinavian ACL registries 2004–2007: baseline epidemiology. Acta Orthop 80(5):563–567CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hettrich CM, Dunn WR, Reinke EK, Group M, Spindler KP (2013) The rate of subsequent surgery and predictors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: two- and 6-year follow-up results from a multicenter cohort. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1534–1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hjermundrud V, Bjune TK, Risberg MA, Engebretsen L, Aroen A (2010) Full-thickness cartilage lesion do not affect knee function in patients with ACL injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(3):298–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Janssen RP, du Mee AW, van Valkenburg J, Sala HA, Tseng CM (2013) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 4-strand hamstring autograft and accelerated rehabilitation: a 10-year prospective study on clinical results, knee osteoarthritis and its predictors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(9):1977–1988CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keays SL, Newcombe PA, Bullock-Saxton JE, Bullock MI, Keays AC (2010) Factors involved in the development of osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports Med 38(3):455–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kirkwood BRSJ (2003) Essential medical statistics, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, p 368Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li RT, Lorenz S, Xu Y, Harner CD, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ (2011) Predictors of radiographic knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39(12):2595–2603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maletis GB, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT (2013) Analysis of 16,192 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from a community-based registry. Am J Sports Med 41(9):2090–2098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oiestad BE, Holm I, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA (2011) The association between radiographic knee osteoarthritis and knee symptoms, function and quality of life 10–15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med 45(7):583–588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28(2):88–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rotterud JH, Sivertsen EA, Forssblad M, Engebretsen L, Aroen A (2013) Effect of meniscal and focal cartilage lesions on patient-reported outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a nationwide cohort study from Norway and Sweden of 8476 patients with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 41(3):535–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Røtterud JH, Risberg MA, Engebretsen L, Årøen A (2012) Patients with focal full-thickness cartilage lesions benefit less from ACL reconstruction at 2–5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(8):1533–1539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Røtterud JH, Sivertsen EA, Forssblad M, Engebretsen L, Årøen A (2011) Effect of gender and sports on the risk of full-thickness articular cartilage lesions in anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees: a nationwide cohort study from Sweden and Norway of 15 783 patients. Am J Sports Med 39(7):1387–1394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shelbourne KD, Gray T (2009) Minimum 10-year results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how the loss of normal knee motion compounds other factors related to the development of osteoarthritis after surgery. Am J Sports Med 37(3):471–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shelbourne KD, Jari S, Gray T (2003) Outcome of untreated traumatic articular cartilage defects of the knee: a natural history study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 2):8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spindler KP, Huston LJ, Wright RW, Kaeding CC, Marx RG, Amendola A, Parker RD, Andrish JT, Reinke EK, Harrell FE Jr, Group M, Dunn WR (2011) The prognosis and predictors of sports function and activity at minimum 6 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a population cohort study. Am J Sports Med 39(2):348–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Widuchowski W, Widuchowski J, Koczy B, Szyluk K (2009) Untreated asymptomatic deep cartilage lesions associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury: results at 10- and 15-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37(4):688–692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ytterstad K, Granan LP, Ytterstad B, Steindal K, Fjeldsgaard KA, Furnes O, Engebretsen L (2012) Registration rate in the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Register: large-volume hospitals perform better. Acta Orthop 83(2):174–178CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Svend Ulstein
    • 1
    • 3
  • Karin Bredland
    • 2
  • Asbjørn Årøen
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Lars Engebretsen
    • 2
    • 4
  • Jan Harald Røtterud
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryAkershus University HospitalLørenskogNorway
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  3. 3.Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  4. 4.Oslo Sports Trauma Research CenterOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations