Gait adaptations following multiple-ligament knee reconstruction occur with altered knee kinematics during level walking

  • Corey J. Scholes
  • Joe T. Lynch
  • Milad Ebrahimi
  • Brett A. Fritsch
  • David A. Parker
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

The biomechanical behaviour of the knee following multiple-ligament reconstruction (MLKR) may play a role in the pathogenesis of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to compare three-dimensional knee kinematics and gait characteristics of MLKR patients to healthy controls during level walking.

Methods

Three-dimensional optoelectronic motion capture during overground walking was performed on 16 patients with MLKR and a group of healthy controls matched individually to each patient for age, gender, height and weight. Three-dimensional knee angles were extracted from the weight acceptance and propulsion sub-phases of gait. Statistical analysis was performed using group-aggregated data, as well as for each patient–control pair using a single-case approach.

Results

Although group analysis detected few differences, single-case analysis revealed significant differences for a proportion of patients for all dependent variables during weight acceptance and propulsion sub-phases of stance. These kinematic differences occurred in the context of reduced gait velocity, step length and cadence, as well as increased time spent in double support.

Conclusion

Patients with MLKR display abnormalities in knee kinematics during gait at an average of 4.5 years after surgery. The pattern of kinematic abnormalities appears individual specific and may not be related to differences in spatiotemporal gait characteristics. The current findings describe detailed functional outcomes of MLKR reconstruction at average medium-term follow-up that provide improved prognostic information for clinicians to counsel patients with these types of injuries.

Keywords

Gait Knee Multiple-ligament reconstruction Single-case Variability Stance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the efforts of the study volunteers in participating in data collection and Mr Laurant Kang, Mrs Amy Brierley and Dr Joe Costa in patient recruitment. The authors also acknowledge the contribution of Mr Ray Patton (University of Sydney) for his technical assistance during data collection and Mr Jack Batchen during data collection and analysis, as well as Dr Myles Coolican and Prof Richard Smith (University of Sydney) for their contribution to resourcing the project and Dr Michael Cole for his contributions to an earlier version of the manuscript. Dr Corey J. Scholes received the Brendon Dooley‐Gordon Trinca Trauma Scholarship from the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons in relation to this work, with additional financial and in-kind support provided by the Sydney Orthopaedic Research Institute.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interests to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Andriacchi TP, Briant PL, Bevill SL, Koo S (2006) Rotational changes at the knee after ACL injury cause cartilage thinning. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:39–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andriacchi TP, Koo S, Dyrby C, Chaudhari A (2006) In vivo knee kinematics following ACL injury and premature osteoarthritis. J Biomech 39(Supplement 1):S63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andriacchi TP, Mundermann A, Smith RL, Alexander EJ, Dyrby CO, Koo S (2004) A framework for the in vivo pathomechanics of osteoarthritis at the knee. Ann Biomed Eng 32(3):447–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arom GA, Yeranosian MG, Petrigliano FA, Terrell RD, McAllister DR (2014) The changing demographics of knee dislocation: a retrospective database review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(9):2609–2614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barton CJ, Levinger P, Webster KE, Menz HB (2011) Walking kinematics in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a case–control study. Gait Posture 33(2):286–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beynon S, McGinley JL, Dobson F, Baker R (2010) Correlations of the gait profile score and the movement analysis profile relative to clinical judgments. Gait Posture 32(1):129–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bruijn SM, van Dieën JH, Meijer OG, Beek PJ (2009) Is slow walking more stable? J Biomech 42(10):1506–1512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buckwalter JA, Anderson DD, Brown TD, Tochigi Y, Martin JA (2013) The roles of mechanical stresses in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: implications for treatment of joint injuries. Cartilage 4(4):286–294CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cluff T, Robertson DGE (2011) Kinetic analysis of stair descent: part 1. Forwards step-over-step descent. Gait Posture 33(3):423–4428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davids K, Glazier P, Araujo D, Bartlett R (2003) Movement systems as dynamical systems: the functional role of variability and its implications for sports medicine. Sports Med 33(4):245–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis RB, Õunpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR (1991) A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci 10(5):575–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Engebretsen L, Risberg MA, Robertson B, Ludvigsen TC, Johansen S (2009) Outcome after knee dislocations: a 2–9 years follow-up of 85 consecutive patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(9):1013–1026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferdinands R, Kersting UG, Marshall RN, Stuelcken M (2010) Distribution of modern cricket bowling actions in New Zealand. Eur J Sport Sci 10(3):179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hart JM, Blanchard BF, Hart JA, Montgomery SC, Schoderbek R, Miller MD (2009) Multiple ligament knee reconstruction clinical follow-up and gait analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(3):277–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heiderscheit BC (2000) Movement variability as a clinical measure for locomotion. J Appl Biomech 16(1):419–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Henriksen M, Alkjær T, Lund H, Simonsen EB, Graven-Nielsen T, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bliddal H (2007) Experimental quadriceps muscle pain impairs knee joint control during walking. J Appl Physiol 103(1):132–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Henriksen M, Graven-Nielsen T, Aaboe J, Andriacchi TP, Bliddal H (2010) Gait changes in patients with knee osteoarthritis are replicated by experimental knee pain. Arthritis Care Res 62(4):501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hirschmann MT, Zimmermann N, Rychen T, Candrian C, Hudetz D, Lorez LG, Amsler F, Muller W, Friederich NF (2010) Clinical and radiological outcomes after management of traumatic knee dislocation by open single stage complete reconstruction/repair. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11(102):1–11Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Irrgang JJ, Fitzgerald GK (2000) Rehabilitation of the multiple-ligament-injured knee. Clin Sports Med 19(3):545–571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    James CR, Herman JA, Dufek JS, Bates BT (2007) Number of trials necessary to achieve performance stability of selected ground reaction force variables during landing. J Sports Sci Med 6(1):126–134PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kirkwood RN, de Souza Moreira B, Vallone MLDC, Mingoti SA, Dias RC, Sampaio RF (2011) Step length appears to be a strong discriminant gait parameter for elderly females highly concerned about falls: a cross-sectional observational study. Physiotherapy 97(2):126–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Knoll Z, Kiss RM, Kocsis L (2004) Gait adaptation in ACL deficient patients before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14(3):287–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kurz MJ, Stergiou N, Buzzi UH, Georgoulis AD (2005) The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on lower extremity relative phase dynamics during walking and running. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(2):107–115. doi: 10.1007/s00167-004-0554-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mills K, Hunt MA, Ferber R (2013) Biomechanical deviations during level walking associated with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res 65(10):1643–1665Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Newell KM, Slifkin AB (1998) The nature of movement variability. In: Piek JP (ed) Motor behaviour and human skill: a multidisciplinary approach. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 143–160Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Noehren B, Wilson H, Miller C, Lattermann C (2013) Long-term gait deviations in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed females. Med Sci Sports Exerc 45(7):1340–1347. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318285c6b6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Plancher KD, Siliski J (2008) Long-term functional results and complications in patients with knee dislocations. J Knee Surg 21(4):261–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Patras K, Tsepis E, Moraiti C, Georgoulis AD (2006) Follow-up evaluation 2 years after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft shows that excessive tibial rotation persists. Clin J Sport Med 16(2):111–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Robertson DGE, Caldwell GE, Hamill J, Kamen G, Whittlesey SN (2004) Research methods in biomechanics. Human Kinetics Publishers, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scanlan SF, Chaudhari AM, Dyrby CO, Andriacchi TP (2010) Differences in tibial rotation during walking in ACL reconstructed and healthy contralateral knees. J Biomech 43(9):1817–1822CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Scanlan SF, Favre J, Andriacchi TP (2013) The relationship between peak knee extension at heel-strike of walking and the location of thickest femoral cartilage in ACL reconstructed and healthy contralateral knees. J Biomech 46(5):849–854CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schenck R Jr (2004) Classification of knee dislocations. In: Fanelli G (ed) The multiple ligament injured knee. Springer, New York, pp 37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Scholes CJ, McDonald MD, Parker AW (2012) Single-subject analysis reveals variation in knee mechanics during step landing. J Biomech 45(12):2074–2078CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Scholes CJ, McDonald MD, Parker AW (2014) Young men utilise limited neuromuscular preparation to regulate post-impact knee mechanics during step landing. Gait Posture 39(1):284–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shabani B, Bytyqi D, Lustig S, Cheze L, Bytyqi C, Neyret P (2015) Gait knee kinematics after ACL reconstruction: 3D assessment. Int Orthop 39(6):1187–1193. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2643-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Skou ST, Wrigley TV, Metcalf BR, Hinman RS, Bennell KL (2014) Association of knee confidence with pain, knee instability, muscle strength, and dynamic varus-valgus joint motion in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 66(5):695–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stanhope SJ, Kepple TM, McGuire DA, Roman NL (1990) Kinematic-based technique for event time determination during gait. Med Biol Eng Comput 28(4):355–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stergiou N, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, Georgoulis AD (2007) Tibial rotation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knees: a theoretical proposition for the development of osteoarthritis. Sports Med 37(7):601–613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Torry MR, Decker MJ, Viola RW, O’Connor DD, Steadman JR (2000) Intra-articular knee joint effusion induces quadriceps avoidance gait patterns. Clin Biomech 15(3):147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Webster KE, Feller JA (2011) Alterations in joint kinematics during walking following hamstring and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Clin Biomech 26(2):175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Webster KE, Feller JA, Wittwer JE (2012) Longitudinal changes in knee joint biomechanics during level walking following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Gait Posture 36(2):167–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Corey J. Scholes
    • 1
  • Joe T. Lynch
    • 1
  • Milad Ebrahimi
    • 1
  • Brett A. Fritsch
    • 1
  • David A. Parker
    • 1
  1. 1.Sydney Orthopaedic Research InstituteChatswoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations