Skip to main content

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Persian Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score

Abstract

Purpose

To cross-culturally adapt the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) to Persian language and to preliminary evaluate the reliability and validity of a Persian ATRS.

Methods

A cross-sectional and prospective cohort study was conducted to translate and cross-culturally adapt the ATRS to Persian language (ATRS-Persian) following steps described in guidelines. Thirty patients with total Achilles tendon rupture and 30 healthy subjects participated in this study. Psychometric properties of floor/ceiling effects (responsiveness), internal consistency reliability, test–retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC), construct validity, and discriminant validity were tested. Factor analysis was performed to determine the ATRS-Persian structure.

Results

There were no floor or ceiling effects that indicate the content and responsiveness of ATRS-Persian. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s α 0.95). Item–total correlations exceeded acceptable standard of 0.3 for the all items (0.58–0.95). The test–retest reliability was excellent [(ICC)agreement 0.98]. SEM and SDC were 3.57 and 9.9, respectively. Construct validity was supported by a significant correlation between the ATRS-Persian total score and the Persian Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (PFAOS) total score and PFAOS subscales (r = 0.55–0.83). The ATRS-Persian significantly discriminated between patients and healthy subjects. Explanatory factor analysis revealed 1 component.

Conclusion

The ATRS was cross-culturally adapted to Persian and demonstrated to be a reliable and valid instrument to measure functional outcomes in Persian patients with Achilles tendon rupture.

Level of evidence

II.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25:3186–3191

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ, Becher JG, Bezemer PD, Verbeek AL (2001) Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res 10:571–578

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruton A, Conway JH, Holgate ST (2000) Reliability: What is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy 86:94–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Button G, Pinney S (2004) A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system? Foot Ankle Int 25:521–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carmont MR, Silbernagel KG, Nilsson-Helander K, Mei-Dan O, Karlsson J, Maffulli N (2013) Cross cultural adaptation of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score with reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1356–1360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganestam A, Barfod K, Klit J, Troelsen A (2013) Validity and reliability of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score. J Foot Ankle Surg 52:736–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garras DN, Raikin SM, Bhat SB, Taweel N, Karanjia H (2012) MRI is unnecessary for diagnosing acute Achilles tendon ruptures: clinical diagnostic criteria. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:2268–2273

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gulati V, Jaggard M, Al-Nammari SS, Uzoigwe C, Gulati P, Ismail N, Gibbons C, Gupte C (2015) Management of achilles tendon injury: a current concepts systematic review. World J Orthop 6:380–386

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaya Mutlu E, Celik D, Kiliçoglu Ö, Ozdincler AR, Nilsson-Helander K (2015) The Turkish version of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2427–2432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kearney RS, Achten J, Lamb SE, Parsons N, Costa ML (2012) The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score: a study of responsiveness, internal consistency and convergent validity on patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Health Qual Life Outcomes 10:24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kristjansson EA, Desrochers A, Zumbo B (2003) Translating and adapting measurement instruments for cross-linguistic and cross-cultural research: a guide for practitioners. Can J Nurs Res 35:127–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lexell JE, Downham DY (2005) How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 84:719–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maffulli N, Ajis A (2008) Management of chronic ruptures of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1348–1360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maffulli N, Waterston SW, Squair J, Reaper J, Douglas AS (1999) Changing incidence of Achilles tendon rupture in Scotland: a 15-year study. Clin J Sport Med 9:157–160

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maffulli N (1998) The clinical diagnosis of subcutaneous tear of the Achilles tendon. A prospective study in 174 patients. Am J Sports Med 26:266–270

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Negahban H, Mazaheri M, Salavati M, Sohani SM, Askari M, Fanian H, Parnianpour M (2010) Reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome score: a validation study from Iran. Clin Rheumatol 29:479–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nilsson-Helander K, Thomeé R, Silbernagel KG, Thomeé P, Faxén E, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2007) The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS): development and validation. Am J Sports Med 35:421–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sode J, Obel N, Hallas J, Lassen A (2007) Use of fluroquinolone and risk of Achilles tendon rupture: a population-based cohort study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 63:499–503

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Streiner D (2003) Starting at the beginning: an introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency. J Pers Assess 80:99–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PM (2003) On assessing responsiveness of health related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res 12:349–362

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the translators, expert committee members, and all subjects who participated in this study. The authors also would like to thank Research Deputy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences for supporting this study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari.

Appendix: Persian Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score

Appendix: Persian Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ansari, N.N., Naghdi, S., Hasanvand, S. et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Persian Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 1372–1380 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3977-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3977-x

Keywords

  • Achilles tendon rupture
  • ATRS
  • Cross-cultural
  • Persian
  • Reliability
  • Validity