Lateral tibial plateau autograft in revision surgery for failed medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

  • Simone Cerciello
  • Brent Joseph Morris
  • Sebastien Lustig
  • Enrico Visonà
  • Giuliano Cerciello
  • Katia Corona
  • Philippe Neyret



Revision surgery for failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with bone loss is challenging. Several options are available including cement augmentation, metal augmentation, and bone grafting. The aim of the present study was to describe a surgical technique for lateral tibial plateau autografting and report mid-term outcomes.


Eleven consecutive patients (median age 69.5 years) affected by posteromedial tibial plateau collapse after medial UKA were enrolled in the present study. The delay between UKA and revision surgery was 21 months (range 15–36 months). All patients were revised with a cemented posterior-stabilized implant, with a tibial stem. Medial tibial plateau bone loss was treated with an autologous lateral tibial plateau bone graft secured with two absorbable screws. All patients were evaluated with the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), and complete radiographic evaluation.


At a median follow-up of 60 months (range 36–84 months), the OKS improved from 21.5 (range 16–26) to 34.5 (range 30–40) (p < 0.01) and the median VAS score improved from 8.0 (range 5–9) to 5.5 (range 3–7) (p < 0.01). No intraoperative complications were recorded. Partial reabsorption of the graft was observed in two cases at final follow-up.


Lateral tibial plateau bone autograft is an alternative to metal wedge or cement augments in the treatment of medial plateau collapse after UKA. Primary fixation of the tibial plateau autograft can be achieved with absorbable screws and a tibial-stemmed implant. Further comparative studies with a larger series may be helpful to draw definitive conclusions.

Level of evidence

Case series, Level IV.


Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Tibial plateau collapse Revision surgery Lateral plateau autograft 


  1. 1.
    Barrett WP, Scott RD (1987) Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1328–1335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brandes M, Ringling M, Winter C, Hillmann A, Rosenbaum D (2010) Changes in physical activity and health-related quality of life during the first year after total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63(3):328–334Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruni D, Akkawi I, Iacono F, Raspugli GF, Gagliardi M, Nitri M, Grassi A, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Marcacci M (2013) Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(11):2462–2467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chakrabarty G, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE (1998) Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Clinical and technical considerations. J Arthroplasty 13(2):191–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 80(1):63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hang JR, Stanford TE, Graves SE, Davidson DC, de Steiger RN, Miller LN (2010) Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta Orthop 81(1):95–98CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levine WN, Ozuna RM, Scott RD, Thornhill T (1996) Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11(7):797–801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L (1998) Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 69(5):469–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin J, Wallace D, Woods D, Carr AJ, Murray DW (1995) Revision of unicondylar knee replacements to total knee replacement. Knee 2(2):121–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McAuley JP, Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (2001) Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:279–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Niinimäki T, Eskelinen A, Mäkelä K, Ohtonen P, Puhto AP, Remes V (2014) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty survivorship is lower than TKA survivorship: a 27-year Finnish registry study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(5):1496–1501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Padgett DE, Stern SH, Insall JN (1991) Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:186–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C (2010) Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(4):508–512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pietschmann MF, Ficklscherer A, Wohlleb L, Schmidutz F, Jansson V, Müller PE (2014) UKA can be safely revised to primary knee arthroplasty by using an autologous bone plate from the proximal lateral tibia. J Arthroplasty 29(10):1991–1995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Revell PA (2008) The combined role of wear particles, macrophages and lymphocytes in the loosening of total joint prostheses. J R Soc Interface 5:1263–1278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robb CA, Matharu GS, Baloch K, Pynset PB (2013) Revision surgery for failed unicompartmental knee replacement: technical aspects and clinical outcome. Acta Orthop Belg 79:312–317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saldanha KA, Keys GW, Svard UC, White RH, Rao C (2007) Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty—results of a multicentre study. Knee 14(4):275–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saragaglia D, Estour G, Nemer C, Colle PE (2009) Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: strategy and results. Int Orthop 33(4):969–974CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shi HF, Xiong J, Chen YX, Wang JF, Qiu XS, Wang YH, Qiu Y (2013) Early application of pulsed electromagnetic field in the treatment of postoperative delayed union of long-bone fractures: a prospective randomized controlled study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(14):35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siddiqui NA, Ahmad ZM (2012) Revision of unicondylar to total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Open Orthop J 6(Suppl 2):268–275CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Springer BD, Scott RD, Thornhill TS (2006) Conversion of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:214–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tinius M, Klima S, Marquass B, Tinius W, Josten C (2006) Revision possibilities after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, an analysis of 116 revisions. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 144(4):367–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Cerciello
    • 1
  • Brent Joseph Morris
    • 2
  • Sebastien Lustig
    • 1
  • Enrico Visonà
    • 3
  • Giuliano Cerciello
    • 4
  • Katia Corona
    • 5
  • Philippe Neyret
    • 1
  1. 1.Albert Trillat CenterLyon North University HospitalLyonFrance
  2. 2.Lexington Clinic Orthopedics - Sports Medicine CenterThe Shoulder Center of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  3. 3.Ospedale di Este, ULSS 17EsteItaly
  4. 4.Casa di Cura Villa Betania, Polo Ospedaliero Santo SpiritoRomeItaly
  5. 5.Science for Health DepartmentMolise UniversityCampobassoItaly

Personalised recommendations