Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with six-strand hamstring tendon allograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy volume 24, pages 2915–2922 (2016)Cite this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with six-strand hamstring tendon (HT) allograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) allograft.

Methods

The prospective randomized controlled trial was included 129 patients. Sixty-nine patients received reconstruction with six-strand HT allografts (HT group), whereas 60 patients with BPTB allografts (BPTB group). Outcome assessment included re-rupture findings, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Lysholm scores, KT-1000 arthrometer, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, range of motion (ROM) and single-leg hop test.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 52 months, 113 patients (HT group, 61 patients; BPTB group, 52 patients) completed a minimum 4-year follow-up. Four patients in HT group and six in BPTB group experienced ACL re-rupture (6.2 vs. 10.3 %) and received revision surgery. Significant between-group differences were observed in KT-1000 outcomes and pivot-shift test 1 (1.2 ± 1.5 vs. 1.8 ± 1.3, p = 0.025; positive rate 6.5 vs. 18.9 %, p = 0.036), 2 (1.1 ± 1.4 vs. 1.6 ± 1.2, p = 0.044; 8.1 vs. 20.7 %, p = 0.039), 4 (1.1 ± 1.5 vs. 1.7 ± 1.4, p = 0.031; 9.7 vs. 25 %, p = 0.012) years postoperatively. The outcomes between the two groups were comparable in terms of IKDC scores, Lysholm scores, Lachman test, ROM and single-leg hop test.

Conclusions

Six-strand HT allograft achieved superior anteroposterior and rotational stability after single-bundle ACL reconstruction. It is a reasonable graft substitute for ACL reconstruction.

Level of evidence

II.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Amis AA, Dawkins GPC (1991) Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament: fiber bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73:260–267

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barber FA, Cowden CH, Sanders EJ (2014) Revision rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft or autograft in a population 25 years old and younger. Arthroscopy 30:483–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin W, Stefanie D, Christian MZ, Jan S, Rainer S, Hans HP (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon: a prospective comparative study with 9-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 27:653–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC et al (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1503–1513

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown CH Jr, Steiner ME, Carson EW (1993) The use of hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: technique and results. Clin Sports Med 12:723–756

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen SB, Sekiya JK (2007) Allograft safety in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 26:597–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper DE, Deng XH, Burstein AL, Warren RF (1993) The strength of the central third patellar tendon graft: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 21:818–824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Feller JA, Webster KE (2003) A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 31:564–573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerhard P, Bolt R, Dück K, Mayer R, Friederich NF, Hirschmann MT (2013) Long-term results of arthroscopically assisted anatomical singlebundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft: Are there any predictors for the development of osteoarthritis? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:957–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goddard M, Bowman N, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Roe JP, Pinczewski LA (2013) Endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in children using living donor hamstring tendon allografts. Am J Sports Med 41:567–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grood ES, Walz-Hasselfeld KA, Holden JP et al (1992) The correlation between anterior-posterior translation and cross-sectional area of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Orthop Res 6:878–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamner DL, Brown CH Jr, Steiner ME et al (1999) Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:549–557

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heijne A, Werner S (2010) A 2-year follow-up of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective randomized outcome study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:805–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Höher J, Möller HD, Fu FH (1998) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:231–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson DW, Grood ES, Goldstein JD et al (1993) A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and allograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the goat model. Am J Sports Med 21:176–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jarvela T (2007) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:500–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. John ET, William RK, Kevin LK, Kevin PM, Bryan C (2002) Braided hamstring tendons for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med 30:5

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kang HJ, Su YL, Cao HJ et al (2013) Arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with modified double-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2066–2071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Krych AJ, Jackson JD, Hoskin TL, Dahm DL (2008) A meta-analysis of patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:292–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leys T, Salmon L, Waller A, Linklater J, Pinczewski L (2012) Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med 40:595–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Livesay GA, Fujie H, Kashiwaguchi S, Morrow DA, Fu FH, Woo SL (1995) Determination of the in situ forces and force distribution within the human anterior cruciate ligament. Ann Biomed Eng 23:467–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma CB, Keifa E, Dunn W et al (2010) Can pre-operative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter. Knee 17:81–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Magnussen RA, Carey JL, Spindler KP (2011) Does autograft choice determine intermediate-term outcome of ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:462–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Magnussen RA, Lawrence TR, West RL, Toth AP, Taylor DC, Garrett WE (2012) Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy 28:526–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kraeutler Matthew J, Bravman Jonathan T, McCarty Eric C (2013) Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients. Am J Sports Med 41:2439–2448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mascarenhas R, Tranovich MJ, Kropf KL, Fu FH, Harner CD (2012) Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young athlete: a retrospective matched analysis with 2–10 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1520–1527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ménétrey J, Duthon VB, Laumonier T, Fritschy D (2008) Biological failure of the anterior cruciate ligament graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:224–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Middleton KK, Hamilton T, Irrgang JJ, Karlsson J, Harner CD, Fu FH (2014) Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a global perspective. Part 1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1467–1482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Muneta T, Hara K, Ju YJ, Mochizuki T, Morito T, Yagishita K, Sekiya I (2010) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by double-bundle technique using multi-strand semitendinosus tendon. Arthroscopy 26:461–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Muneta T, Takakuda K, Yamamoto H (1997) Intercondylar notch width and its relation to the configuration and cross-sectional area of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cadaveric knee study. Am J Sports Med 25:69–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakamura N, Horibe S, Sasaki S, Kitaguchi T, Tagami M et al (2002) Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 18:598–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nin JR, Leyes M, Schweitzer D (1996) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with fresh-frozen patellar tendon allografts: sixty cases with 2 years minimum follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 4:137–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Noh JH, Yi SR, Song SJ, Kim SW, Kim W (2011) Comparison between hamstring autograft and free tendon Achilles allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using EndoButton and Intrafix. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:816–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Norwood LA, Cross MJ (1997) Anterior cruciate ligament: functional anatomy of its bundles in rotatory instabilities. Am J Sports Med 1:23–26

    Google Scholar 

  35. Noyes FR, Grood ES (1996) The strength of the anterior cruciate ligament in humans and Rhesus monkeys. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:1074–1082

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pioletti DP, Heegaard JH, Rakotomanana RL, Leyvraz PF, Blankevoort L (1995) Experimental and mathematical methods for representing relative surface elongation of the ACL. J Biomech 28:1123–1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Radford WJR, Amis AA (1990) Biomechanical properties of a double prosthetic ligament in the anterior cruciate deficient knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72:1038–1043

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Romanini E, D’Angelo F, De Masi S et al (2010) Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Traumatol 11:211–219

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sajovic M, Vengust V, Komadina R, Tavcar R, Skaza K (2006) A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: five-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34:1933–1940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shunji H, Kouji Y, Takashi K (2001) Circumferential measurement and analysis of strain distribution in the human ACL using a photoelastic coating method. J Biomech 34:1135–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Stuker BD, Lester GE, Banes AJ et al (1990) Cyclic strain stimulates DNA and collagen synthesis in fibroblasts cultured from rat medial collateral ligaments. Trans Orthop Res Soc 15:130

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sun K, Zhang J, Wang Y et al (2011) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstring tendon autograft and fresh-frozen allograft: a prospective, randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med 39:1430–1438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tomita F, Yasuda K, Mikami S et al (2001) Comparisons of intraosseous graft healing between the doubled flexor tendon graft and the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 17:461–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wagner M, Kaab MJ, Schallock J, Haas NP, Weiler A (2005) Hamstring tendon versus patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable interference fit fixation: a prospective matched-group analysis. Am J Sports Med 33:1327–1336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wallace MP, Howell SM, Hull ML (1997) In vivo tensile behavior of a four-bundle hamstring graft as a replacement for the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res 15:539–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Weiler A, Hoffmann RF, Bail HJ, Rehm O, Sudkamp NP (2002) Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part II: histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep. Arthroscopy 18:124–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wilson TW, Zafuta MP, Zobitz MA (1999) Biomechanical analysis of matched bone-patellar tendon-bone and double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med 27:202–207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Woo SL, Gomez MA, Sites TJ et al (1987) The biomechanical and morphological changes in the medial collateral ligament of the rabbit after immobilization and remobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1200–1211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Woo SL, Hollis JM, Adams DJ, Lyon RM, Takai S (1991) Tensile properties of the human femur-anterior cruciate ligament-tibia complex: the effects of specimen age and orientation. Am J Sports Med 19:217–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP (2006) Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1060–1069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Joint Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei, People’s Republic of China

    Chengliang Dai, Fei Wang, Xiaomeng Wang, Ruipeng Wang, Shengjie Wang & Shiyu Tang

Authors
  1. Chengliang Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaomeng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ruipeng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shengjie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shiyu Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dai, C., Wang, F., Wang, X. et al. Arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with six-strand hamstring tendon allograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 2915–2922 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3569-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3569-9

Keywords

search

Navigation