Skip to main content
Log in

Individual valgus correction angle improves accuracy of postoperative limb alignment restoration after total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the current study was to compare and investigate the effect of fixed and individual valgus correction angle (VCA) on postoperative alignment restoration. It is hypothesized that individual VCA would be more accurate than fixed VCA in postoperative limb alignment restoration.

Methods

Four hundred and fifty-two patients with 546 consecutive uncomplicated primary total knee arthroplasties performed by a single surgeon, with 302 knees that had individual VCA (group A) and 244 knees that had fixed 5° VCA (group B), were enroled in this study. Preoperative and postoperative full-length standing hip-to-ankle radiographs were used to assess limb alignment. Postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (θ), femoral component angle (α) and tibial component angle (β) were measured and compared between the two groups.

Results

Mean postoperative θ angle and α angle were 178.9° (SD 1.3°) and 89.1° (SD 1.1°) in the group A, whereas they were 177.8° (SD 1.9°) and 87.9° (SD 1.5°) in the group B. There were significant differences in both parameters between the two groups (p = 0.021 and 0.016, respectively). Mean postoperative β was 89.8° (SD 1.2°) in the group A and 89.7° (SD 1.3°) in the group B, and no significant difference was detected. There were 114 (37.7 %), 221 (73.2 %) and 265 (87.7 %) knees that had restoration of mechanical axis to ±1°, ±2°, ±3° of neutral, respectively, and 37 (12.3 %) outliers (>±3°) in the group A, whereas there were 48 (19.7 %), 122 (50.0 %) and 170 (69.7 %) knees that had restoration of mechanical axis to ±1°, ±2°, ±3° of neutral, respectively, and 74 (30.3 %) outliers in the group B. Group A had a higher percentage of restoration of limb alignment and fewer outliers than those in the group B, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The results from the present study demonstrated that individual VCA for distal femoral resection could enhance the accuracy of postoperative limb alignment restoration compared with fixed VCA. For clinical relevance, individual VCA should be recommended for routine use in all patients in order to achieve the expected postoperative neutral limb alignment and reduce the risk of postoperative malalignment due to the planning error of a fixed VCA.

Level of evidence

Prospective comparative study, Level II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC (2003) Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplast 20(7 Suppl. 3):132–138

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bardakos N, Cil A, Thompson B, Stocks G (2007) Mechanical axis cannot be restored in total knee arthroplasty with a fixed valgus resection angle: a radiographic study. J Arthroplast 22(6 suppl. 2):85–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett WP, Mason JB, Moskal JT, Dalury DF, Oliashirazi A, Fisher DA (2011) Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 26(8):1273–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:682–687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crane C, Marimuthu K, Chen DB, Harris IA, Wheatley E, MacDessi SJ (2014) Radiographic outcome of limb-based versus knee-based patient specific guides in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 21(6):1244–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Deakin AH, Basanagoudar PL, Nunag P, Johnston AT, Sarungi M (2012) Natural distribution of the femoral mechanical–anatomical angle in an osteoarthritic population and its relevance to total knee arthroplasty. Knee 19:120–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deakin AH, Sarungi M (2014) A comparison of variable angle versus fixed angle distal femoral resection in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 29:1133–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gioe TJ, Killeen KK, Grimm K, Mehle S, Scheltema K (2004) Why are total knee replacements revised? Analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:100–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:709–714

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang C, Insall JN (1989) Effect of rotation on the axial alignment of the femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:50–56

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YH, Kim JS, Choi Y, Kwon OR (2009) Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:14–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kharwadkar N, Kent RE, Sharara KH, Naique S (2006) 5° to 6° of distal femoral cut for uncomplicated primary total knee arthroplasty: Is it safe? Knee 13:57–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koch PP, Muller D, Pisan M, Fucentese SF (2013) Radiographic accuracy in TKA with a CT-based patient-specific cutting block technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2200–2205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koninckx A, Schwab PE, Deltour A, Thienpont E (2014) The minimally invasive far medial subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1765–1770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA (1996) Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:102–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen PW (2001) The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplast 16:635–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McGrory JE, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Nigbur M (2002) Preoperative hip to ankle radiographs in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mullaji AB, Shetty GM, Kanna R, Vadapalli RC (2013) The influence of preoperative deformity on valgus correction angle: an analysis of 503 total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplast 28(1):20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nam D, Maher PA, Robles A, Mclawhorn AS, Mayman DJ (2013) Variability in the relationship between the distal femoral mechanical and anatomical axes in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 28(5):798–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nuno-Siebrecht N, Tanzer MM, Bobyn JD (2000) Potential errors in axial alignment using intramedullary instrument for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 15(2):228–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Plaskos C, Hodgson AJ, Inkpen K, McGraw RW (2002) Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 17:698–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reed SC, Gollish J (1997) The accuracy of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 12(6):677–682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ritter MA, Farris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shi X, Shen B, Kang P, Yang J, Zhou Z, Pei F (2013) The effect of posterior tibial slope on knee flexion in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(12):2696–2703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Swanson KE, Stocks GW, Warren PD, Hazel MR, Janssen HF (2000) Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:246–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tashiro Y, Matsuda S, Okazaki K, Mizu-Uchi H, Kuwashima U, Iwamoto Y (2014) The coronal alignment after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can be predicted: usefulness of full-length valgus stress radiography for evaluating correctability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:3142–3149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

This work was supported by Health Industry Special Scientific Research Projects of China—The safety and effectiveness evaluation of arthroplasty (201302007).

Ethical standard

Institutional Review Board of West China Hospital of Sichuan University has approved this experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zongke Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, X., Li, H., Zhou, Z. et al. Individual valgus correction angle improves accuracy of postoperative limb alignment restoration after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 277–283 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3496-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3496-1

Keywords

Navigation