Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

No difference in anterior knee pain after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with or without patellofemoral osteoarthritis

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to compare functional outcomes of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PF OA) and those without PF OA and to evaluate the effect of PF OA on functional outcomes after UKA.

Methods

The outcomes of 48 knees in patients without PF OA who underwent medial UKA (non-PF OA group) were compared to the outcomes of 57 knees in patients with PF OA [Kellgren–Lawrence (K–L) grade ≤2] who underwent medial UKA (PF OA group) with a median follow-up of 5.4 years (range 3.1–10.2 years). Clinical outcomes including anterior knee pain, HSS scores, radiological parameters, and the progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis were compared, and their effects on functional outcomes were evaluated at the final follow-up visits.

Results

At final follow-up visits, no significant inter-group difference was found in terms of anterior knee pain (1.9 vs. 1.9 in non-PF OA and PF OA groups, respectively), HSS score, or range of motion. Preoperative anterior knee pain and patellofemoral joint degeneration were found to be unrelated to poor outcome in patients that underwent medial UKA. Furthermore, no correlation was found between any functional outcome variable and chondral lesion pattern.

Conclusions

The result of UKA for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis was excellent regardless of PF OA (K–L grade ≤2). Hence, the patients with medial unicompartmental OA combined with a moderate degree of anterior knee pain or patellofemoral arthritis should be viewed as appropriate candidates for medial UKA.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM (2002) Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:2235–2239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baldini A, Anderson JA, Zampetti P, Pavlov H, Sculco TP (2006) A new patellofemoral scoring system for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:150–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Banks SA, Freqly BJ, Boniforti F, Reinschmidt C, Romagnoli S (2005) Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:551–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beard DJ, Pandit H, Gill HS, Hollinghurst D, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2007) The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89-B:1597–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beard DJ, Pandit H, Ostlere S, Jenkins C, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2007) Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89-B:1602–1607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Morris MJ, Hurst JM, Kavolus JJ (2011) Does preoperative patellofemoral joint state affect medial unicompartmental arthroplasty survival? Orthopedics 34:e494–e496

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berger RA, Della Valle CJ (2010) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: indications, techniques, and results. Instr Course Lect 59:47–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (2005) Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:999–1006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (2004) The progression of patellofemoral arthrosis after medial unicompartmental replacement: results at 11 to 15 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:92–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brittberg M, Winalski CS (2003) Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 2):58–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodfellow JW, O’Connor J (1986) Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:21–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2002) Patellar impingement following unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1132–1137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heyse TJ, El-Zayat BF, De Corte R et al (2014) UKA closely preserves natural kinematics in vitro. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1902–1910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kleemann RU, Krocker D, Cedraro A, Tuischer J, Duda GN (2005) Altered cartilage mechanics and histology in knee osteoarthritis: relation to clinical assessment (ICRS Grade). Osteoarthr Cartil 13:958–963

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kozinn SC, Scott R (1989) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71-A:145–150

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O (1993) Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy 9:159–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee CH, Ha CW, Kim S, Kim M, Song YJ (2013) A novel patellofemoral scoring system for patellofemoral joint status. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95-A:620–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liddle AD, Pandit H, Jenkins C, Price AJ, Dodd CA, Gill HS, Murray DW (2013) Preoperative pain location is a poor predictor of outcome after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 1 and 5 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2421–2426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:983–989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Simmons S, Lephart S, Rubash H, Pifer GW, Barrack R (1996) Proprioception after unicondylar knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:179–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tecklenburg K, Dejour D, Hoser C, Fink C (2006) Bony and cartilaginous anatomy of the patellofemoral joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthosc 14:235–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Grant (CRI12072-3) from Chonnam National University Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Keun Seon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, EK., Park, JK., Park, CH. et al. No difference in anterior knee pain after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with or without patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 208–213 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3367-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3367-9

Keywords

Navigation