Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 1706–1712 | Cite as

Should we aim at undercorrection when doing a total knee arthroplasty?

  • T. LuyckxEmail author
  • F. Vanhoorebeeck
  • J. Bellemans
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

Restoration of neutral mechanical alignment is traditionally considered as one of the prerequisites for successful total knee replacement. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a certain bias towards undercorrection exists with conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) instruments.

Methods

A cohort of 456 consecutive patients, who underwent the same standardised TKA with restoration of neutral mechanical alignment as target, was studied. Based on the preoperative alignment, patients were stratified into three categories: valgus, neutral and varus. Component and limb alignment were compared between these groups.

Results

The mean post-operative hip–knee–ankle angle was −0.7° (SD 2.5) in valgus knees, 0.2° (SD 1.9) in neutral knees and 2.4° (SD 3.9) in varus knees (p < 0.001). About 39.8 % of the varus knees remained in >3° of varus post-operative and 20.2 % of the valgus knees remained in <−3° of valgus. A systematic unintentional undercorrection was noted in varus knees, which was proportional to the preoperative varus deformity and which was caused by varus positioning of both the femoral and tibial components. In valgus knees, the undercorrection was caused almost exclusively by valgus bias of the femoral component’s position.

Conclusion

This study showed that conventional TKA instruments are associated with a systematic unintentional bias towards undercorrection of the pre-existing deformity. The clinical relevance of this study is that intentionally aiming at slight undercorrection of the deformity may lead to excessive undercorrection in reality in case the surgeon does not recognise the automatic bias that already exists with standard instruments.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic study, Level III.

Keywords

Total knee arthroplasty Alignment Undercorrection Joint line 

References

  1. 1.
    Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:45–53CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonner TJ, Eardley WGP, Patterson P, Gregg PJ (2011) The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1217–1222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brouwer RW, Jakma TSC, Brouwer KH, Verhaar JAN (2007) Pitfalls in determining knee alignment: a radiographic cadaver study. J Knee Surg 20:210–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Colebatcha AN, Hartb DJ, Zhaib G, Williamsb FM, Spectorb TD, Ardena NK (2009) Effective measurement of knee alignment using AP knee radiographs. Knee 16:42–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooke TDV, Sled EA, Scudamore RA (2007) Frontal plane knee alignment: a call for standardized measurement. J Rheumatol 34:1796–1801PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE (2009) Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplast 24:39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA (1996) Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:102–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Magnussen RA, Weppe F, Demey G, Servien E, Lustig S (2011) Residual varus alignment does not compromise results of TKAs in patients with preoperative varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:3443–3450CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paley D (2003) Principles of deformity correction. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–60Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2143–2149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA (2011) The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1588–1596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sabharwal S, Zhao CEM (2008) Lower limb alignment in children: reference values based on a full-length standing radiograph. J Pediatr Orthop 28:740–746CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vanlommel L, Vanlommel J, Claes S, Bellemans J (2013) Slight undercorrection following total knee arthroplasty results in superior clinical outcomes in varus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2325–2330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity Hospitals LeuvenPellenberg, LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations