Abstract
Purpose
The role of ankle arthroscopy in managing the consequences of ankle fractures is yet to be fully established. This study aims to assess this procedure in terms of the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis, re-operation rate and patient-reported outcomes.
Methods
Sixty-six patients were identified [mean age 40 years (SD 13 years)] who had undergone ankle arthroscopy following a fracture of the distal tibia or fibula. Medical case notes were reviewed to ascertain details of the index injury, intra-operative findings and identify any further procedures. Patients were then contacted using a standardized questionnaire to assess satisfaction and return to normal function.
Results
Injury occurred in a mean of 2 years 10 months before arthroscopy (SD 13 months, min 6 months). Forty-nine of 66 fractures (74 %) had been managed operatively. The commonest indication for arthroscopy was anterior impingement (45 %) followed by degenerative change (30 %) and osteochondral lesions (OCL) (18 %). Intra-operative findings revealed an unexpected OCL or frank degenerative change in 20 % of patients. Using a Kaplan–Meier estimate 1 year after arthroscopy, 10 % of patients had undergone further surgery. This had increased to 34 % by 4 years after arthroscopy. Four patients underwent ankle fusion. Questionnaires were completed by 55/66 patients (84 %). Only 28 patients (50 %) felt surgery allowed them to return to normal activity. Thirty-nine patients reported a benefit from surgery (75 %) whilst 43 were satisfied (77 %) and 48 (86 %) would recommend the procedure to a friend.
Conclusions
Intra-articular pathology was significantly underestimated preoperatively for one patient in five. Arthroscopy improved symptoms in 75 % of patients who complain of ankle symptoms after fracture of the ankle or distal tibia. However, further procedures were required in 34 % of patients. The findings of this study help guide patient counselling and operative decision-making in this challenging group of patients.
Level of evidence
IV.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cao P, De Rango P, Verzini F, Parlani G, Romano L, Cieri E (2011) Comparison of surveillance versus aortic endografting for small aneurysm repair (CAESAR): results from a randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 41(1):13–25
Cha SD, Kim HS, Chung ST, Yoo JH, Park JH, Kim JH, Hyung JW (2012) Intra-articular lesions in chronic lateral ankle instability: comparison of arthroscopy with magnetic resonance imaging findings. Clin Orthop Surg 4(4):293–299
Clasper JC, Pailthorpe CA (1996) Chronic ankle pain in soldiers: the role of ankle arthroscopy and soft tissue excision. J R Army Med Corps 142(3):107–109
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ
Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A (2006) GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 28:1–11
Gur I, Lee W, Akopian G, Rowe VL, Weaver FA, Katz SG (2011) Clinical outcomes and implications of failed infrainguinal endovascular stents. J Vasc Surg 53(3):658–666
Hassan AH (2007) Treatment of anterolateral impingements of the ankle joint by arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(9):1150–1154
Hintermann B, Regazzoni P, Lampert C, Stutz G, Gachter A (2000) Arthroscopic findings in acute fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82(3):345–351
Kim HN, Park YJ, Kim GL, Park YW (2013) Arthroscopy combined with hardware removal for chronic pain after ankle fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(6):1427–1433
Leontaritis N, Hinojosa L, Panchbhavi VK (2009) Arthroscopically detected intra-articular lesions associated with acute ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(2):333–339
Loren GJ, Ferkel RD (2002) Arthroscopic assessment of occult intra-articular injury in acute ankle fractures. Arthroscopy 18(4):412–421
Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Mahomed N, Demaziere A (1993) Anterior impingement of the ankle treated by arthroscopic removal of bony spurs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(3):437–440
Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Sekyi-Otu A (1995) Arthroscopic debridement for the osteoarthritic ankle. Arthroscopy 11(4):433–436
Schuman L, Struijs PA, van Dijk CN (2002) Arthroscopic treatment for osteochondral defects of the talus. Results at follow-up at 2–11 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(3):364–368
SooHoo NF, Krenek L, Eagan MJ, Gurbani B, Ko CY, Zingmond DS (2009) Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(5):1042–1049
Stufkens SA, Van den Bekerom MP, Kerkhoffs GM, Hintermann B, van Dijk CN (2011) Long-term outcome after 1822 operatively treated ankle fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Injury 42(2):119–127
Takao M, Uchio Y, Naito K, Fukazawa I, Kakimaru T, Ochi M (2004) Diagnosis and treatment of combined intra-articular disorders in acute distal fibular fractures. J Trauma 57(6):1303–1307
van Dijk CN, Scholte D (1997) Arthroscopy of the ankle joint. Arthroscopy 13(1):90–96
van Dijk CN, Verhagen RA, Tol JL (1997) Arthroscopy for problems after ankle fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(2):280–284
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dawe, E.J.C., Jukes, C.P., Ganesan, K. et al. Ankle arthroscopy to manage sequelae after ankle fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23, 3393–3397 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3140-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3140-0