Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 1693–1698 | Cite as

Does knee stability in the coronal plane in extension affect function and outcome after total knee arthroplasty?

  • Hiroyuki Nakahara
  • Ken OkazakiEmail author
  • Satoshi Hamai
  • Shigetoshi Okamoto
  • Umito Kuwashima
  • Hidehiko Higaki
  • Yukihide Iwamoto



The aim of the present study was to clarify whether varus–valgus laxities under static stress in extension, femoral condylar lift-off during walking, and patient-reported outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were correlated with each other.


Ninety-four knees, which had undergone posterior-stabilized TKA, were analysed. The varus–valgus laxity during knee extension was measured using a stress radiograph. New Knee Society Score (KSS) questionnaires were mailed to all patients. Correlations between the values of stress radiographs and KSS were analysed. Additionally, continuous radiological images were taken of 15 patients while each walked on a treadmill to determine condylar lift-off from the tibial tray using a 3D-to-2D image-to-model registration technique. Correlations between the amount of lift-off and either the stress radiograph or the KSS were also analyzed.


The mean angle measured was 5.9 ± 2.7° with varus stress and 5.0 ± 1.6° with valgus stress. The difference between them was 0.9 ± 2.8°. Varus–valgus laxities, or the differences between them, did not show any statistically significant correlation with either component of the KSS (p > 0.05). The average amount of femoral condylar lift-off during walking was 1.4 ± 0.8 mm (medial side) and 1.3 ± 0.6 mm (lateral side). The amount of lift-off did not correlate with either varus–valgus laxities or the KSS (p > 0.05).


No correlations were found among varus–valgus laxities under static stress in extension, femoral condylar lift-off during walking, or patient-reported outcomes after well-aligned TKA. This study suggests that small variations in coronal laxities do not influence lift-off during walking and the patient-reported outcomes.

Level of evidence



Total knee arthroplasty Coronal laxity Lift-off Walking Patient-reported outcome 



This work was supported by institutional funding from the Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23000011).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Bejek Z, Paróczai R, Szendröi M, Kiss RM (2011) Gait analysis following TKA: comparison of conventional technique, computer-assisted navigation and minimally invasive technique combined with computer-assisted navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:285–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clement ND, Burnett R (2013) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty is affected by their general physical well-being. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2638–2646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Kim RH, Sharma A (2010) Gap balancing versus measured resection technique for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:102–107CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Draganich LF, Pottenger LA (2000) The TRAC PS mobile-bearing prosthesis: design rationale and in vivo 3-dimensional laxity. J Arthroplast 15:102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamai S, Miura H, Higaki H, Matsuda S, Shimoto T, Sasaki K, Yoshizumi M, Okazaki K, Tsukamoto N, Iwamoto Y (2008) Kinematic analysis of kneeling in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties. J Orthop Res 26:435–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamai S, Miura H, Okazaki K, Shimoto T, Higaki H, Iwamoto Y (2013) No influence of coronal laxity and alignment on lift-off after well-balanced and aligned total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2500-5 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Math K, Dennis DA, Anderson DT (2002) Correlation between condylar lift-off and femoral component alignment. Clin Orthop Relate Res 403:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ishii Y, Matsuda Y, Ishii R, Sakata S, Omori G (2003) Coronal laxity in extension in vivo after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 8:538–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Matsuda Y, Takeda M, Walker SA, Komistek RD (2007) Effect of knee laxity on in vivo kinematics of meniscal-bearing knee prostheses. Knee 14:269–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jennings LM, Bell CI, Ingham E, Komistek RD, Stone MH, Fisher J (2007) The influence of femoral condylar lift-off on the wear of artificial knee joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 221:305–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanekasu K, Banks SA, Honjo S, Nakata O, Kato H (2004) Fluoroscopic analysis of knee arthroplasty kinematics during deep flexion kneeling. J Arthroplasty 19:998–1003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Matsuda S, Nakahara H, Okamoto S, Iwamoto Y (2013) Internal rotation of femoral component affects functional activities after TKA-survey with the 2011 Knee Society Score. J Arthroplast. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(13)00862-0 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuster MS, Bitschnau B, Votruba T (2004) Influence of collateral ligament laxity on patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparative bilateral study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:415–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matsuda Y, Ishii Y (2004) In vivo laxity of low contact stress mobile-bearing prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 419:138–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matsuda S, Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Iwamoto Y (2013) Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:127–133CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merle-Vincent F, Couris CM, Schott AM, Conrozier T, Piperno M, Mathieu P, Vignon E (2011) Factors predicting patient satisfaction 2 years after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine 78:383–386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moynihan AL, Varadarajan KM, Hanson GR, Park SE, Nha KW, Suggs JF, Johnson T, Li G (2010) In vivo knee kinematics during high flexion after a posterior-substituting total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 34:497–503CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Noble PC, Scuderi GR, Brekke AC, Sikorskii A, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Chadha P, Daylamani DA, Scott WN, Bourne RB (2012) Development of a new Knee Society scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:20–32CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Okazaki K, Miura H, Matsuda S, Takeuchi N, Mawatari T, Hashizume M, Iwamoto Y (2006) Asymmetry of mediolateral laxity of the normal knee. J Orthop Sci 11:264–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schnurr C, Jarrous M, Güdden I, Eysel P, König DP (2013) Pre-operative arthritis severity as a predictor for total knee arthroplasty patients’ satisfaction. Int Orthop 37:1257–1261CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN (2012) The new Knee Society knee scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3–19CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Crane HS (1999) In vivo determination of condylar lift-off and screw-home in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 14:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Turcot K, Sagawa Y Jr, Fritschy D, Hoffmeyer P, Suvà D, Armand S (2013) How gait and clinical outcomes contribute to patients’ satisfaction three months following a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 28:1297–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Hal CT, van Hellemondt GG, Wymenga AB, Jacobs WC (2007) The anterior-posterior laxity after total knee arthroplasty inserted with a ligament tensor. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1019–1022CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Warren PJ, Olanlokun TK, Cobb AG, Walker PS, Iverson BF (1994) Laxity and function in knee replacements. A comparative study of three prosthetic designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:200–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroyuki Nakahara
    • 1
  • Ken Okazaki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Satoshi Hamai
    • 1
  • Shigetoshi Okamoto
    • 1
  • Umito Kuwashima
    • 1
  • Hidehiko Higaki
    • 2
  • Yukihide Iwamoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Biorobotics, Faculty of EngineeringKyushu Sangyo UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations