Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Moderate value of non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging after non-dislocating shoulder trauma

  • Shoulder
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to determine the value of shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained in the community setting interpreted by musculoskeletal radiologists in patients with shoulder pain initiated by a single non-dislocating shoulder trauma.

Methods

In 56 of 61 consecutive patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy due to pain after a single non-dislocating shoulder trauma, the data sets of non-contrast MRI were complete. These were retrospectively interpreted by three radiologists specialized on musculoskeletal MRI who were blinded for patients’ history and who did not have access to the reports of arthroscopy. Standard evaluation forms were used to assess the MRIs for superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions, anterior or posterior labrum lesions, lesions of the long head of biceps tendon (LHB) and for partial tears of the supraspinatus tendon and the upper quarter of the subscapularis tendon. Quality of the MRI was assessed by each radiologist on a four-point scale.

Results

The pooled sensitivity for the three radiologists for the detection of SLAP lesions was 45.0 %, for anterior or posterior labrum tears 77.8 and 66.7 %, for lesions of the LHB 63.2 % and for partial tears of the supraspinatus or subscapularis tendon tears 84.8 and 33.3 %. Corresponding inter-rater reliabilities were poor (SLAP lesions) to substantial (anterior labrum tears). Quality of MRI only influenced the accuracy for the detection of posterior labrum tears.

Conclusion

A non-contrast shoulder MRI obtained in the community setting after non-dislocating shoulder trauma has a moderate sensitivity for most intraarticular pathologies when interpreted by musculoskeletal radiologists. Accuracy is dependent on the observer and not on the assessed quality.

Level of evidence

Case series, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams CR, Schoolfield JD, Burkhart SS (2010) Accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting a subscapularis tendon tear based on arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 26:1427–1433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams CR, Brady PC, Koo SS, Narbona P, Arrigoni P, Karnes GJ, Burkhart SS (2012) A systematic approach for diagnosing subscapularis tendon tears with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans. Arthroscopy 28:1592–1600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amin MF, Youssef A (2012) The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder in detection and grading of SLAP lesions: comparison with arthroscopic findings. Eur J Radiol 81:2343–2347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Applegate GR, Hewitt M, Snyder SJ, Watson E, Kwak S, Resnick D (2004) Chronic labral tears: value of magnetic resonance arthrography in evaluating the glenoid labrum and labral-bicipital complex. Arthroscopy 20:959–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barth JR, Burkhart SS, De Beer JF (2006) The bear-hug test: a new and sensitive test for diagnosing a subscapularis tear. Arthroscopy 22:1076–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartsch M, Greiner S, Haas NP, Scheibel M (2010) Diagnostic values of clinical tests for subscapularis lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1712–1717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Connolly KP, Schwartberg RS, Reuss B, Crumble D, Homan BM (2013) Sensitivity and specifity of non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging reports in the diagnosis of type-II superior labral anterior–posterior lesions in the community setting. J Bone Joint Surg-A 20:308–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fallahi F, Green N, Gadde S, Jeavons L, Armstrong P, Jonker L (2013) Indirect magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder; a reliable diagnostic tool for investigation of suspected labral pathology. Skelet Radiol 42:1225–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Foad A, Wijdicks CA (2012) The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging magnetic resonance arthrogram versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of subscapularis tendon injury. Arthroscopy 28:636–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox JA, Noerdlinger MA, Romeo AA (2003) Arthroscopic subscapularis repair. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:154–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman R, Khanna S, Ricketts D (2013) Inappropriate requests for magnetic resonance scans of the shoulder. Int Orthop 37:2181–2184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Grant JA, Miller BS, Jacobson JA, Morag Y, Bedi A, Carpenter JE, The MOON shoulder group (2012) Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the detection of tears of the supraspinatus central tendon on MRI by shoulder surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gusmer PB, Potter HG, Schatz JA, Wickiewicz TL, Altchek DW, O’Brien SJ, Warren RF (2006) Labral injuries: accuracy of detection with unenhanced MR imaging of the shoulder. Radiology 200:519–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Habermeyer P, Krieter C, Kang-lai T, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P (2008) A new arthroscopic classification of articular-sided footprint lesions: a prospective comparison with Snyder’s and Ellman’s classification. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:909–913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Houtz CG, Schwartzberg RS, Barry JA, Reuss BL, Papa L (2011) Shoulder MRI accuracy in the community setting. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:537–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maffet MW, Gartsman GM, Moseley B (1995) Superior labrum-biceps tendon complex lesions of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 23:93–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Major NM, Browne J, Domzalski J, Cothran RL, Helms CA (2011) Evaluation of glenoid labrum with 3-T MRI: is intraarticular contrast necessary? AJR 19:1139–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Neviaser TJ (1993) The GLAD lesion: another cause of anterior shoulder pain. Arthroscopy 9:22–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicola T (1942) Anterior dislocation of the shoulder: the role of the articular capsule. J Bone Joint Surg-A 25:614–616

    Google Scholar 

  21. Philipps JC, Cook C, Beaty S, Kissenberth MJ, Siffri P, Hawkins RJ (2013) Validity of noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing superior labrum anterior–posterior tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reuss BL, Schwartzberg R, Zlatkin MB, Cooperman A, Dixon JR (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy for the diagnosis of superior labrum anterior–posterior lesions in the community setting: eighty-three arthroscopically confirmed cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:580–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schaeffeler C, Waldt S, Holzapfel K, Kirchhoff C, Jungmann PM, Wolf P, Schröder M, Rummeny EJ, Imhoff AB, Woertler K (2012) Lesions of the biceps pulley: diagnostic accuracy of MR arthrography of the shoulder and evaluation of previously described and new diagnostic signs. Radiology 264:504–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith TO, Daniell H, Geere J-A, Toms AP, Hing CB (2012) The diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the detection of partial- and full-thickness rotator cuff tears in adults. Magn Resonance Imaging 30:336–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith TO, Drew BT, Toms AP (2012) A meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of MRA and MRI for the detection of glenoid labral injury. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:905–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Snyder SJ, Karzel RP, Del Pizzo W, Ferkel RD, Friedman MJ (1990) SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 6:274–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spencer EE, Dunn WR, Wright RW, Wolf BR, Spindler KP, McCarthy E, Ma CB, Jones G, Safran M, Holloway GB, Kuhn JE, Shoulder Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (Shoulder MOON Group) (2008) Interobserver agreement in the classification of rotator cuff tears using magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 36:99–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stetson WB, Phillips T, Deutsch A (2005) The use of magnetic resonance arthrography to detect partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg-A 87:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Suder PA, Hougaard F, Frich LH, Rasmussen OS, Lundorf E (1994) Intraarticular findings in the chronically painful shoulder. A study of 32 posttraumatic cases. Acta Orthop Scand 65:339–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Suder PA, Frich LH, Hougaard K, Lundorf E, Jakobsen BW (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of capsulolabral tears after traumatic primary anterior shoulder dislocation. A prospective comparison with arthroscopy of 25 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:419–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T, Yanagawa T, Nakajima D, Shitara H, Kobayashi T (2010) Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:116–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No author declares conflicts of interest regarding this publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Health – School of Medicine, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimerstr. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany

    Marc Banerjee, Maurice Balke, Bertil Bouillon & Sven Shafizadeh

  2. Praxis im KölnTriangle, Cologne, Germany

    Jonas Müller-Hübenthal

  3. Mediapark Klinik, Cologne, Germany

    Stefan Grimme

  4. Cologne Merheim Medical Center, IFOM, Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany

    Rolf Lefering

  5. Department of Radiology, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany

    Axel Goßmann

Authors
  1. Marc Banerjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonas Müller-Hübenthal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Grimme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maurice Balke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bertil Bouillon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rolf Lefering
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Axel Goßmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sven Shafizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Banerjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banerjee, M., Müller-Hübenthal, J., Grimme, S. et al. Moderate value of non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging after non-dislocating shoulder trauma. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 1888–1895 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3102-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3102-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation