Low back pain in female elite football and handball players compared with an active control group
- 660 Downloads
The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to compare the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) among female elite football and handball players to a matched non-professional active control group.
The participants were requested to answer a questionnaire based on standardized Nordic questionnaires for musculoskeletal symptoms to assess the prevalence of LBP. Included participants were elite female football (n = 277) and handball players (n = 190), and a randomly selected control group from the Norwegian population (n = 167).
Fifty-seven percentage of the football players, 59 % of the handball players and 60 % of the control group had experienced LBP the previous year. There were no significant group differences in the prevalence of LBP ever (p = 0.62), the previous year (p = 0.85) or the previous 7 days (p = 0.63). For both sports, there was a significant increase in prevalence of LBP from the resting period to the competitive periods of the season (p ≤ 0.001). Seventy percent of the goalkeepers in both football and handball had experienced LBP the previous year.
There were no difference in LBP among female elite football and handball players compared with the control group. However, female elite athletes in football and handball reported a high prevalence of LBP compared to previous studies. The variations in LBP and playing positions indicate that specific field positions, in football and handball, is a risk factor for developing LBP.
Level of evidence
KeywordsLow back pain Prevalence Female Elite athletes Football Handball
- 4.Bahr R, Andersen SO, Loken S, Fossan B, Hansen T, Holme I (2004) Low back pain among endurance athletes with and without specific back loading–a cross-sectional survey of cross-country skiers, rowers, orienteerers, and nonathletic controls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(4):449–454Google Scholar
- 17.Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM, de Vet HC, Douwes M, Koes BW, Miedema MC, Ariens GA, Bouter LM (2000) Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work are risk factors for low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(23):3087–3092Google Scholar
- 18.Hoskins W, Pollard H, Daff C, Odell A, Garbutt P, McHardy A, Hardy K, Dragasevic G (2009) Low back pain status in elite and semi-elite Australian football codes: a cross-sectional survey of football (soccer), Australian rules, rugby league, rugby union and non-athletic controls. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-158 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Ristolainen L, Heinonen A, Turunen H, Mannstrom H, Waller B, Kettunen JA, Kujala UM (2010) Type of sport is related to injury profile: a study on cross country skiers, swimmers, long-distance runners and soccer players. A retrospective 12-month study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 20(3):384–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Stanton TR, Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Latimer J, McAuley JH (2008) After an episode of acute low back pain, recurrence is unpredictable and not as common as previously thought. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(26):2923–2928Google Scholar
- 35.Sward L, Hellstrom M, Jacobsson B, Nyman R, Peterson L (1991) Disc degeneration and associated abnormalities of the spine in elite gymnasts. A magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16(4):437–443Google Scholar
- 36.Sward L, Hellstrom M, Jacobsson B, Peterson L (1990) Back pain and radiologic changes in the thoraco-lumbar spine of athletes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15(2):124-129Google Scholar
- 38.Videman T, Sarna S, Battie MC, Koskinen S, Gill K, Paananen H, Gibbons L (1995) The long-term effects of physical loading and exercise lifestyles on back-related symptoms, disability, and spinal pathology among men. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(6):699–709Google Scholar