Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Arthroscopic knotless-anchor rotator cuff repair: a clinical and radiological evaluation

  • Shoulder
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of the arthroscopic knotless-anchor Speed-Bridge technique, in particular the pattern and the rate of retears. The results were compared with a modified Suture-Bridge knot-tying technique (mDR). The hypothesis is that arthroscopic knotless-anchor Speed-Bridge rotator cuff repair is a sufficient technique to address supraspinatus tears and differs in pattern of retears when compared to mDR.

Methods

This study includes twenty-two consecutive patients (8f/14m ø 63.3 ± 7.2 years) undergoing knotless-anchor Speed-Bridge repair. The subjective shoulder value (SSV), Constant score (CS) and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Score were used for clinical follow-up. MRI scans were conducted within 3 weeks post-operatively, after 1 and after 2 years for analysis of (a) tendon integrity (according to Sugaya), (b) muscle atrophy according to Thomazeau and (c) fatty infiltration. Results were compared with 20 patients operated in mDR (ø 61.2 ± 7.5 years).

Results

The mean follow-up was 24.4 ± 4.7 months. The average SSV was 88.7 ± 14.9 %, the CS was 78.2 ± 13.2 points (contralateral side 78.5 ± 16.6) and the WORC Score averaged 87.1 ± 18.2 %. On magnetic resonance imaging, the integrity failure rate was 22.7 % (n = 5). The pattern of retear was a medial cuff failure in 2/5 cases (mDR 4/5, n.s.). Muscular atrophy or fatty degeneration did not increase between surgery and follow-up (n.s.). Compared with mDR (25 %) reconstruction, no significant differences were obtained regarding integrity failure rate and muscular atrophy (n.s.).

Conclusion

The modified knotless-anchor Speed-Bridge technique shows good to excellent clinical results as well as acceptable retear rates. This technique eliminates medial and lateral knot impingement. Concerning the potential reduction in the medial strangulation of the tendon, there is a need for further clinical research.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderl W, Heuberer PR, Laky B, Kriegleder B, Reihsner R, Eberhardsteiner J (2012) Superiority of bridging techniques with medial fixation on initial strength. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2559–2566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aydin N, Kocaoglu B, Guven O (2010) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in small- to medium-sized tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:722–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bishop J, Klepps S, Lo IK, Bird J, Gladstone JN, Flatow EL (2006) Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:290–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown BS, Cooper AD, McIff TE, Key VH, Toby EB (2008) Initial fixation and cyclic loading stability of knotless suture anchors for rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:313–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buess E, Waibl B, Vogel R, Seidner R (2009) A comparative clinical evaluation of arthroscopic single-row versus double-row supraspinatus tendon repair. Acta Orthop Belg 75:588–594

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho NS, Yi JW, Lee BG, Rhee YG (2010) Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row versus suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 38:664–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chu T, McDonald E, Tufaga M, Kandemir U, Buckley J, Ma CB (2011) Comparison of completely knotless and hybrid double-row fixation systems: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 27:479–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cole BJ, ElAttrache NS, Anbari A (2007) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations. Arthroscopy 23:662–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cummins CA, Murrell GA (2003) Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:128–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Frank JB, ElAttrache NS, Dines JS, Blackburn A, Crues J, Tibone JE (2008) Repair site integrity after arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 36:1496–1503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerhardt C, Hug K, Pauly S, Marnitz T, Scheibel M (2012) Arthroscopic single-row modified mason-allen repair versus double-row suture bridge reconstruction for supraspinatus tendon tears: a matched-pair analysis. Am J Sports Med 40:2777–2785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilbart MK, Gerber C (2007) Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:717–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grasso A, Milano G, Salvatore M, Falcone G, Deriu L, Fabbriciani C (2009) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study. Arthroscopy 25:4–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huber W, Hofstaetter JG, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Posch M, Wurnig C (2005) Translation and psychometric testing of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) for use in Germany. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:453–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, Jun BJ, DeLaMora SN, Kvitne RS, Lee TQ (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34:407–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lapner PL, Sabri E, Rakhra K, McRae S, Leiter J, Bell K, Macdonald P (2012) A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing single-row with double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1249–1257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liem D, Schmidt C, Vogler T, Dedy N (2011) Single row, double row, or transosseous repair. Biomechanical and clinical data. Obere Extremität 6:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lorbach O, Bachelier F, Vees J, Kohn D, Pape D (2008) Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair. Am J Sports Med 36:1504–1510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:403–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA (2005) Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 33:1861–1868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meier SW, Meier JD (2006) The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 22:1168–1173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Milano G, Grasso A, Zarelli D, Deriu L, Cillo M, Fabbriciani C (2008) Comparison between single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:75–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park MC, Elattrache NS, Ahmad CS, Tibone JE (2006) “Transosseous-equivalent” rotator cuff repair technique. Arthroscopy 22:e1–e5

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pauly S, Gerhardt C, Chen J, Scheibel M (2010) Single versus double-row repair of the rotator cuff: does double-row repair with improved anatomical and biomechanical characteristics lead to better clinical outcome? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1718–1729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pauly S, Kieser B, Schill A, Gerhardt C, Scheibel M (2010) Biomechanical comparison of 4 double-row suture-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques using different medial-row configurations. Arthroscopy 26:1281–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pauly S, Fiebig D, Kieser B, Albrecht B, Schill A, Scheibel M (2011) Biomechanical comparison of four double-row speed-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques with or without medial or lateral row enhancement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(12):2090–2097

  28. Pennington WT, Gibbons DJ, Bartz BA, Dodd M, Daun J, Klinger J, Popovich M, Butler B (2010) Comparative analysis of single-row versus double-row repair of rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 26:1419–1426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Redziniak DE, Hart J, Turman K, Treme G, Lunardini D, Miller MD, Diduch DR (2009) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the Opus knotless suture anchor fixation system. Am J Sports Med 37:1106–1110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rhee YG, Cho NS, Parke CS (2012) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using modified mason-allen medial row stitch: knotless versus knot-tying suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 40:2440–2447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Scheibel M (2012) Recurrent defects of the rotary cuff: causes and therapeutic strategies. Oper Orthop Traumatol 24:458–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith CD, Alexander S, Hill AM, Huijsmans PE, Bull AM, Amis AA, De Beer JF, Wallace AL (2006) A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2425–2431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J (2005) Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy 21:1307–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Thomazeau H, Rolland Y, Lucas C, Duval JM, Langlais F (1996) Atrophy of the supraspinatus belly. Assessment by MRI in 55 patients with rotator cuff pathology. Acta Orthop Scand 67:264–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Trantalis JN, Boorman RS, Pletsch K, Lo IK (2008) Medial rotator cuff failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 24:727–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vaishnav S, Millett PJ (2010) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: scientific rationale, surgical technique, and early clinical and functional results of a knotless self-reinforcing double-row rotator cuff repair system. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(2 Suppl):83–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yamakado K, Katsuo S, Mizuno K, Arakawa H, Hayashi S (2010) Medial-row failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 26:430–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany

    Konstantin Hug, Christian Gerhardt, Hendrik Haneveld & Markus Scheibel

Authors
  1. Konstantin Hug
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Gerhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hendrik Haneveld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Markus Scheibel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Scheibel.

Additional information

Konstantin Hug and Christian Gerhardt have contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hug, K., Gerhardt, C., Haneveld, H. et al. Arthroscopic knotless-anchor rotator cuff repair: a clinical and radiological evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23, 2628–2634 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3026-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3026-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation