Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 1135–1140 | Cite as

Associations between inadequate knee function detected by KOOS and prospective graft failure in an anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee

  • Lars-Petter Granan
  • Valborg Baste
  • Lars Engebretsen
  • Maria C. S. Inacio
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

First, to evaluate whether the 2 year post-operative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs) was significantly different between patients that did not go on to have a subsequent revision after the 2 year post-operative control and the ones that did. Second, to test whether the “clinically failure” value of KOOS quality of life (QoL) < 44 was indicative of a clinically relevant difference in the risk of subsequent revision ACLR.

Methods

ACLRs reported to the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry between June 2004 and December 2009. 5,517 primary ACLRs with at least 2-year follow-up with KOOS QoL before revision surgery.

Results

There were clinically significant differences, adjusted and unadjusted, in both the KOOS Sport and Recreation and QoL subscales in patients with a later revision surgery compared to those that did not have a revision surgery. In adjusted models, the risk of later ACLR revision was 3.7 (95 % CI 2.2–6.0) higher in patients with a 2-year KOOS QoL < 44 compared to patients with a KOOS QoL ≥ 44. For every 10-point reduction in the KOOS QoL, a 33.6 % (95 % CI 21.2–47.5 %) higher risk for later ACLR revision was observed.

Conclusions

This study reveals an association between inadequate knee function, as measured by KOOS, and a prospective ACL-reconstructed graft failure.

Level of evidence

Prognostic study (prospective cohort study), Level II.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament Revision Registry Patient-reported outcome measures 

References

  1. 1.
    Ageberg E, Forssblad M, Herbertsson P, Roos EM (2010) Sex differences in patient-reported outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the Swedish knee ligament register. Am J Sports Med 38:1334–1342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahlden M, Samuelsson K, Sernert N, Forssblad M, Karlsson J, Kartus J (2012) The Swedish national anterior cruciate ligament register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients. Am J Sports Med 40:2230–2235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Comins J, Brodersen J, Krogsgaard M, Beyer N (2008) Rasch analysis of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): a statistical re-evaluation. Scand J Med Sci Sports 18:336–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eitzen I, Moksnes H, Snyder-Mackler L, Risberg MA (2010) A progressive 5-week exercise therapy program leads to significant improvement in knee function early after anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Ortho Sports Phys Ther 40:705–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frobell RB, Roos EM, Roos HP, Ranstam J, Lohmander LS (2010) A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Engl J Med 363:331–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Granan LP, Bahr R, Steindal K, Furnes O, Engebretsen L (2008) Development of a national cruciate ligament surgery registry: the Norwegian national knee ligament registry. Am J Sports Med 36:308–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hambly K, Griva K (2010) IKDC or KOOS: which one captures symptoms and disabilities most important to patients who have undergone initial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Am J Sports Med 38:1395–1404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roos EM, Lohmander LS (2003) The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:64CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS (1998) Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:439–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ytterstad K, Granan LP, Ytterstad B, Steindal K, Fjeldsgaard KA, Furnes O, Engebretsen L (2012) Registration rate in the Norwegian cruciate ligament register: large-volume hospitals perform better. Acta Orthop 83:174–178CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars-Petter Granan
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Valborg Baste
    • 4
  • Lars Engebretsen
    • 5
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maria C. S. Inacio
    • 6
  1. 1.Oslo Sports Trauma Research CenterNorwegian School of Sport SciencesOsloNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian Knee Ligament RegistryBergenNorway
  3. 3.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  4. 4.Norwegian Arthroplasty RegisterBergenNorway
  5. 5.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  6. 6.Surgical Outcomes and Analysis DepartmentKaiser PermanenteSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations