Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in the ankle joint

Abstract

Purpose

Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is an established procedure in the ankle providing satisfactory results. The development of a completely arthroscopic ACI procedure in the ankle joint made the technique easier and reduced the morbidity. The purpose of this investigation was to report the clinical results of a series of patients who underwent arthroscopic ACI of the talus at a mean of 7 ± 1.2-year follow-up.

Methods

Forty-six patients (mean age 31.4 ± 7.6) affected by osteochondral lesions of the talar dome (OLT) received arthroscopic ACI between 2001 and 2006. Patients were clinically evaluated using AOFAS score pre-operatively and at 12, 36 months and at final follow-up of 87.2 ± 14.5 months.

Results

The mean pre-operative AOFAS score was 57.2 ± 14.3. At the 12-month follow-up, the mean AOFAS score was 86.8 ± 13.4 (p = 0.0005); at 36 months after surgery, the mean score was 89.5 ± 13.4 (p = 0.0005); whereas at final follow-up of 87.2 ± 14.5 months it was 92.0 ± 11.2 (p = 0.0005). There were three failures. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluations of specimens harvested from failed implants generally showed several aspects of a fibro-cartilaginous tissue associated with some aspects of cartilage tissue remodelling as indicated by the presence of type II collagen expression.

Conclusion

This study confirmed the ability of arthroscopic ACI to repair osteochondral lesions in the ankle joint with satisfactory clinical results after mid-term follow-up.

Level of evidence

IV, retrospective case series.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. 1.

    Aurich M, Bedi HS, Smith PJ et al (2011) Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle with matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation: early clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results. Am J Sports Med 39:311–319

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Battaglia M, Vannini F, Buda R, Cavallo M, Ruffilli A, Monti C, Galletti S, Giannini S (2011) Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in osteochondral lesions of the talus: mid-term T2-mapping MRI evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1376–1384

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Becher C, Thermann H (2005) Results of microfracture in the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 26:583–589

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Buckwalter J, Mow V, Ratcliffe A (1994) Restoration of injured or degenerated articular cartilage. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2:192–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Della Villa S, Kon E, Filardo G et al (2010) Does intensive rehabilitation permit early return to sport without compromising the clinical outcome after arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in highly competitive athletes? Am J Sports 38:68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ebert JR, Robertson WB, Lloyd DG, Zheng MH, Wood DJ, Ackland T (2008) Traditional versus accelerated approaches to post-operative rehabilitation following matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): comparison of clinical, biomechanical and radiographic outcomes. Osteoarthr Cartil 16:1131–1140

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Filardo G, Kon E, Di Martino A, Patella S, Altadonna G, Balboni F, Bragonzoni L, Visani A, Marcacci M (2012) Second-generation arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of degenerative cartilage lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1704–1713

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Giannini S, Vannini F (2004) Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: current concepts review. Foot Ankle Int 25:168–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Giannini S, Battaglia M, Buda R, Cavallo M, Ruffilli A, Vannini F (2009) Surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus by open-field autologous chondrocyte implantation: a 10-year follow-up clinical and magnetic resonance imaging T2-mapping evaluation. Am J Sports Med 37(Suppl 1):112S–118S

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Giannini S, Buda R, Cavallo M, Ruffilli A, Cenacchi A, Cavallo C, Vannini F (2010) Cartilage repair evolution in post-traumatic osteochondral lesions of the talus: from open field autologous chondrocyte to bone-marrow-derived cells transplantation. Injury 41:1196–1203

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Giannini S, Buda R, Grigolo B, Vannini F, De Franceschi L, Facchini A (2005) The detached osteochondral fragment as a source of cells for autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in the ankle joint. Osteoarthr Cartil 13:601–607

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Giannini S, Buda R, Vannini F, Di Caprio F, Grigolo B (2008) Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in osteochondral lesions of the talus: surgical technique and results. Am J Sports Med 36:873–880

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Giannini S, Buda R, Vannini F, Cavallo M, Grigolo B (2009) One-step bone marrow-derived cell transplantation in talar osteochondral lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:3307–3320

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gobbi A, Francisco RA, Lubowitz JH, Allegra F, Canata G (2006) Osteochondral lesions of the talus: randomized controlled trial comparing chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteochondral autograft transplantation. Arthroscopy 22:1085–1092

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Harris JD, Siston RA, Pan X, Flanigan DC (2010) Autologous chondrocyte implantation: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2220–2233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hangody L, Feczkó P, Bartha L, Bodó G, Kish G (2001) Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular defects of the knee and ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391(Suppl):S328–S336

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hangody L, Fules P (2003) Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: 10 years of experimental and clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 2):25–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Henderson I, Lavigne P, Valenzuela H, Oakes B (2007) Autologous chondrocyte implantation: superior biologic properties of hyaline cartilage repairs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 455:253–261

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hyer CF, Berlet GC, Philbin TM, Lee TH (2008) Retrograde drilling of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Spec 1:207–209

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kon E, Filardo G, Berruto M, Benazzo F, Zanon G, Della Villa S, Marcacci M (2011) Articular cartilage treatment in high-level male soccer players: a prospective comparative study of arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med 39:2549–2557

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kon E, Gobbi A, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M (2009) Arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture for chondral lesions of the knee: prospective non randomized study at 5 years. Am J Sports Med 37:33–41

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kreuz PC, Steinwachs M, Erggelet C et al (2006) Mosaicplasty with autogenous talar autograft for osteochondral lesions of the talus after failed primary arthroscopic management: a prospective study with a 4-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34:55–63

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lee KT, Lee YK, Young KW, Park SY, Kim JS (2012) Factors influencing result of autologous chondrocyte implantation in osteochondral lesion of the talus using second look arthroscopy. Scand J Med Sci Sports 22:510–515

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Magnan B, Samaila E, Bondi M, Vecchini E, Micheloni GM, Bartolozzi P (2012) Three-dimensional matrix-induced autologous chondrocytes implantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus: midterm results. Adv Orthop 2012:942174

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Marcacci M, Berruto M, Brocchetta D et al (2005) Articular cartilage engineering with Hyalograft C: 3-year clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:96–105

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Nam EK, Ferkel RD, Applegate GR (2009) Autologous chondrocyte implantation of the ankle: a 2- to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37:274–284

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Niemeyer P, Salzmann G, Schmal H, Mayr H, Südkamp NP (2011) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects of the talus: a meta-analysis of available evidence. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1696–1703

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pavesio A, Abatangelo G, Borrione A et al (2003) Hyaluronan-based scaffolds (Hyalograft C) in the treatment of knee cartilage defects: preliminary clinical findings. Novartis Found Symp 249:203–217; discussion 229–233, 234–238, 239–241

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Peterson L, Brittberg M, Kiviranta I (2002) Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Am J Sports Med 30:2–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Peterson L, Vasiliadis HS, Brittberg M, Lindahl A (2010) Autologous chondrocyte implantation: a long-term follow-up. Am J Sports Med 38:1117–1124

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Schneider TE, Karaikudi S (2009) Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) grafting for osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 30:810–814

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Taranow WS, Bisignani GA, Towers JD, Conti SF (1999) Retrograde drilling of osteochondral lesions of the medial talar dome. Foot Ankle Int 20:474–480

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Whittaker JP, Smith G, Makwana N et al (2005) Early results of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:179–183. Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:886

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wondrasch B, Zak L, Welsch GH, Marlovits S (2009) Effect of accelerated weightbearing after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation on the femoral condyle on radiographic and clinical outcome after 2 years: a prospective, randomized controlled pilot study. Am J Sports Med 37(Suppl 1):88S–96S

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zengerink M, Struijs PA, Tol JL, van Dijk CN (2010) Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:238–246

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Ruffilli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giannini, S., Buda, R., Ruffilli, A. et al. Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in the ankle joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22, 1311–1319 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2640-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Osteochondral lesion
  • Autologous chondrocyte implantation
  • Ankle joint
  • Arthroscopy